A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New Butterfly Vario



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 13th 12, 11:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
T8
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 429
Default New Butterfly Vario

On Feb 13, 6:17*pm, Dave Nadler wrote:
Sure, a number of them, but I won't.
The rules recommendation to set start cylinder top
WELL BELOW CLOUDBASE has helped (when CDs have
followed the recommendation)...


If we're talking about pilots willfully flying into the edges of
clouds, then it doesn't seem like adding AHs is going to contribute to
safety. Maybe you see it differently?

-Evan Ludeman / T8
  #2  
Old February 14th 12, 12:08 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dave Nadler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,610
Default New Butterfly Vario

I am just passing along observations.
Remember, the rule was created (at least) partly to reduce the temptation...
FWIW, Best Regards, Dave
  #3  
Old February 14th 12, 12:51 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
noel.wade
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 681
Default New Butterfly Vario

On Feb 13, 4:08*pm, Dave Nadler wrote:
I am just passing along observations.
Remember, the rule was created (at least) partly to reduce the temptation....
FWIW, Best Regards, Dave


Sorry, I realize I'm breaking my word about shutting up - but was that
rule created *before* the new start-cylinder rules that require you to
be below start cylinder height for 2 minutes prior to going through
the gate?

Because with the newer start-cylinder rules in place, a lot of these
concerns go away.

--Noel
(OK, really this time, I'll be quiet for a bit!)

  #4  
Old February 14th 12, 01:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Brad[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 722
Default New Butterfly Vario

On Feb 13, 4:51*pm, "noel.wade" wrote:
On Feb 13, 4:08*pm, Dave Nadler wrote:

I am just passing along observations.
Remember, the rule was created (at least) partly to reduce the temptation...
FWIW, Best Regards, Dave


Sorry, I realize I'm breaking my word about shutting up - but was that
rule created *before* the new start-cylinder rules that require you to
be below start cylinder height for 2 minutes prior to going through
the gate?

Because with the newer start-cylinder rules in place, a lot of these
concerns go away.

--Noel
(OK, really this time, I'll be quiet for a bit!)


it's easier if you just say "I won't post anymore" to yourself rather
than post it, how do I know this......
besides, this is a good thread with a lot of information........if the
internet was around in it's current form during the early day's of GPS
I bet things would have sounded very similar.

Brad
  #5  
Old February 14th 12, 01:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dave Nadler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,610
Default New Butterfly Vario

Sure the rule was created way back, so ?
IFF the start cylinder top is set above cloudbase,
what do you think happens ?
Hope that makes sense !

  #6  
Old February 14th 12, 01:09 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
T8
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 429
Default New Butterfly Vario

On Feb 13, 7:51*pm, "noel.wade" wrote:
On Feb 13, 4:08*pm, Dave Nadler wrote:

I am just passing along observations.
Remember, the rule was created (at least) partly to reduce the temptation...
FWIW, Best Regards, Dave


Sorry, I realize I'm breaking my word about shutting up - but was that
rule created *before* the new start-cylinder rules that require you to
be below start cylinder height for 2 minutes prior to going through
the gate?

Because with the newer start-cylinder rules in place, a lot of these
concerns go away.

--Noel
(OK, really this time, I'll be quiet for a bit!)


2 minute rule has been with us since the beginning of GPS start.

Problems arise when top of lift is 5500 and top of gate is 6000 and
guys poke up into the murk.

CDs don't always follow recommended practice....

Nav devices without gyros probably are never going to constitute
instruments that "permit flight without reference to ground". GPS
plus ipaq or similar probably okay no matter what software. I don't
speak for the RC, but I think this is a pretty defensible position.
I'm planning on using XCSoar in comps in April & May.

-Evan Ludeman / T8
  #7  
Old February 14th 12, 03:16 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,939
Default New Butterfly Vario

On 2/13/2012 4:51 PM, noel.wade wrote:
On Feb 13, 4:08 pm, Dave wrote:
I am just passing along observations.
Remember, the rule was created (at least) partly to reduce the temptation...
FWIW, Best Regards, Dave


Sorry, I realize I'm breaking my word about shutting up - but was that
rule created *before* the new start-cylinder rules that require you to
be below start cylinder height for 2 minutes prior to going through
the gate?

Because with the newer start-cylinder rules in place, a lot of these
concerns go away.


The rule against cloud-flying instruments has been in force for decades.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to
email me)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Butterfly iGlide Reed von Gal Soaring 4 May 2nd 12 06:00 PM
WTB: 57mm Cambridge Vario/FS: 80mm Cambridge Vario ufmechanic Soaring 0 March 24th 09 05:31 PM
TE vario G.A. Seguin Soaring 8 June 8th 04 04:44 AM
WTB LD-200 Vario Romeo Delta Soaring 0 June 4th 04 03:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.