![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As Ramy says. Also, if both have PowerFlarm and Transponder, the
glider PF will only show the tug transponder as the nearest and will not alert to a possible approaching transponder. As the combination is one entity in air law (I assume it is in the USA as it is in the UK) it is logical to leave all unambiguous alerts to the tug pilot. Once separated, the glider needs its own alerts, and the tug will soon be away. (Because I have separate PCAS and Flarm in my glider, and no transponder, I don’t have the problem.) Not that you can’t still have collisions – I know of at least one UK fatal collision between a tug and the glider it had not long since towed up. Be careful out there. Chris N. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A possible solution would be to have the PF ignore a constant close-
in, almost same altitude threat (i.e.the glider) after a reasonable period of time, say a couple of minutes. After staging, this would have the tow plane PF start to ignore the glider's Mode-C either on the take off roll or early in the climb. Additionally a software fix might be tied in to the aircraft type and function only if the "tow plane" option is menu selected. I've contacted PowerFlarmUS re. this and some other suggestions and they are responsive. I wasn't meaning to do an end run, but rather wanted input from others to confirm if what I'm experiencing is indeed a problem needing addressing. The seperate issue of tug and glider transponders interfering with one another while on tow has no fix, I'm aware of, other than leaving one transponder in standby for the duration of the tow. bumper |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At SoaringNV's staff meeting yesterday, we discussed the PowerFlarm
and transponder issue. It was quickly decided that having the glider transponder on STBY until release would not be workable due to the fact we often have non-pilots sitting behind the main instrument panel. So, yesterday we tried having the tow plane squawk standby until tow release, then switch to ALT. This works fine in terms of not having the transponders interfere with each other . . . but does nothing to resolve the PF beng in constant alarm due to the collision it thinks might occur at any time between tug and glider. But, this thread brought elicited a private response reminding me what I already knew, and that is that the FARs require a transponder be on at all times if its installed, except as directed by ATC etc. ATC will almost always direct that all but the "lead" aircraft squawk standby when formation flying, something that we do often while towing. To try and resolve this I called Reno Approach who quickly shuffled me off to NorCal Approach. Talked with a front line manager there who advised us to do exactly what I suggested. i.e. Leave the tug transponder squawking STBY until tow release and then don't forget to switch to ALT. Now he did say that even if we left both on ALT, they would probably still be able to see us*. But then added that the data displayed would be confused and would potentially cause conflict alarms as well. *A secondary concern is that TCAS equipped aircraft will get good data from our transponder/s. bumper zz Minden |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not to sound like a smartass, but have you considered leaving the PowerFlarm
off until release? Is the collision potential so great over your usual tow route/altitude that you don't feel safe without it? "bumper" wrote in message ... At SoaringNV's staff meeting yesterday, we discussed the PowerFlarm and transponder issue. It was quickly decided that having the glider transponder on STBY until release would not be workable due to the fact we often have non-pilots sitting behind the main instrument panel. So, yesterday we tried having the tow plane squawk standby until tow release, then switch to ALT. This works fine in terms of not having the transponders interfere with each other . . . but does nothing to resolve the PF beng in constant alarm due to the collision it thinks might occur at any time between tug and glider. But, this thread brought elicited a private response reminding me what I already knew, and that is that the FARs require a transponder be on at all times if its installed, except as directed by ATC etc. ATC will almost always direct that all but the "lead" aircraft squawk standby when formation flying, something that we do often while towing. To try and resolve this I called Reno Approach who quickly shuffled me off to NorCal Approach. Talked with a front line manager there who advised us to do exactly what I suggested. i.e. Leave the tug transponder squawking STBY until tow release and then don't forget to switch to ALT. Now he did say that even if we left both on ALT, they would probably still be able to see us*. But then added that the data displayed would be confused and would potentially cause conflict alarms as well. *A secondary concern is that TCAS equipped aircraft will get good data from our transponder/s. bumper zz Minden |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 23, 5:47*pm, "Dan Marotta" wrote:
Not to sound like a smartass, but have you considered leaving the PowerFlarm off until release? *Is the collision potential so great over your usual tow route/altitude that you don't feel safe without it? I've seen quite a few incidents in which the glider pilot picked up the collision threat before the tow pilot. This sounds like a pretty straightforward issue for flarm to solve -- writing software to know "this is the towplane, you're on tow, ignore it" doesn't sound like rocket science. John Cochrane |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agreed, software is simple for those who know how. It's just getting all
the wishes implemented. BTW, I was referring to the tow plane's flarm. The glider could warn the tug of any conflicts, couldn't he? Then I remember the incident in Boulder a few years back... "John Cochrane" wrote in message ... On Feb 23, 5:47 pm, "Dan Marotta" wrote: Not to sound like a smartass, but have you considered leaving the PowerFlarm off until release? Is the collision potential so great over your usual tow route/altitude that you don't feel safe without it? I've seen quite a few incidents in which the glider pilot picked up the collision threat before the tow pilot. This sounds like a pretty straightforward issue for flarm to solve -- writing software to know "this is the towplane, you're on tow, ignore it" doesn't sound like rocket science. John Cochrane |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 23, 3:47*pm, "Dan Marotta" wrote:
Not to sound like a smartass, but have you considered leaving the PowerFlarm off until release? *Is the collision potential so great over your usual tow route/altitude that you don't feel safe without it? That's kind of like saying I know my street and neighborhood really well, so I won't bother to fasten my seat belt until I get a few miles down the road. It's not so much a matter of not feeling safe without the PowerFlarm, but rather of being safer with it. Statistically, at least for power planes, most mid-airs occur within a few miles of airports, just like most car accidents occur within 5 miles of home. bumper |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PowerFLARM | Paul Remde | Soaring | 9 | November 6th 10 04:30 AM |
PowerFlarm response to transponders | Mark | Soaring | 1 | November 1st 10 03:07 PM |
transponders in EU | Sandro | Soaring | 2 | February 2nd 07 01:02 PM |
Transponders | [email protected] | Home Built | 2 | March 2nd 05 02:39 AM |
Transponders | Mil80C | Soaring | 64 | February 12th 04 05:46 PM |