![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 8, 9:55*am, Mike the Strike wrote:
Still important, but perhaps for a separate thread, is a strategy for escaping from a line of sink rather than just dealing with the mathematical consequences. As I noted earlier, lift and sink lines are frequently aligned and knowledge of the relative heading of the glider along or across these lines would give the pilot useful information for an avoidance strategy. You can see the forecast predictions of any such lift/sink lines on the RASP Boundary Layer Up/Down Motion or the equivalent HRRR field "Mean Layer Vertical Velocity". Changing your final glide heading from a line of sink into a line of lift might have more benefit than accepting the inevitable and dialing up doom on your flight computer! Mike Yes. In rivers of blue sink, I often just head 90 degrees off course and wait. Put another way, though, you have to use a much higher glide slope (MacCready value + reserve) for safety spots that are upwind/downwind or aligned with lift/sink streets than for safety spots that are crosswind or not so aligned. The airports are where they are, so going crosswind isn't always an option. John Cochrane |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great article, John, and another valuable service (as usual)! I like
to think it analyzes and explains what many pilots have been doing somewhat intuitively (based on experience) but I suspect we all have our own style. Often I will leave the MC set as speed to fly but keep climbing in what may be the last thermal. If the climb rate is above MC, I just keep climbing, of course. As the thermal weakens and they converge and I'm now above glide path, I bump the MC setting up enough to push the final glide margin down to zero (though I've still got my 300 or 500 goal margin set) to see how "fat" I am. I'm frequently surprised at how quickly the MC settings increase to what seem to be absurd levels in the East, which is another way of saying that using very high MC settings doesn't give you nearly the unassailable safety margin (in feet) you might think. I usually don't fly that absurdly high MC setting until I'm fairly close in (and/or over landable terrain or with good clouds and/or markers ahead to pick up a little extra). In fact, I'll switch back and forth and to see what the MC setting is that would take me all the way home and whether it's increasing or decreasing vs. what is my margin over final glide at cruise MC and whether that's increasing or decreasing. No wonder final glides are so confusing. ![]() This argues for decoupling final glide MC from speed to fly MC, as you suggest. Chip Bearden ASW 24 "JB" U.S.A. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Strategy For Iraq! | W. D. Allen | Naval Aviation | 0 | June 23rd 06 09:30 PM |
"Strategy and Air Power" - AEI | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 0 | March 4th 05 04:01 PM |
New strategy in fighting AL-Queda | Leadfoot | Naval Aviation | 2 | September 1st 03 12:40 AM |
New strategy in fighting AL-Queda | Leadfoot | Military Aviation | 0 | August 29th 03 02:26 AM |
Nosegear collapse repair strategy: what else? | Jeff Osier-Mixon | Owning | 3 | July 11th 03 04:49 PM |