![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stephen Harding" wrote in message ... Kevin Brooks wrote: [snip some interesting stats and possible myths of Vietnam] old draftees killed, only *seven* were black); and Vietnam was the first unpopular US war (false, at least in an arguable sense; he points out that a 1937 poll indicated that fully 64% of Americans considered our entry into WWI as being a blunder, and two years after WWII 25% of Americans thought our participation in *that* war had been a misguided); and lastly (Art One could argue on that percentage basis that the Revolution was even more unpopular. None other than Ben Franklin put the split between rebel/loyalist/fence sitter at about 1/3 each. The Mexican War was rather controversial in Congress, and of course, the Civil War had its bad days when northern opinion in support would be low. The "sour taste" of WWI involvement after the fact in the US is well known, and pretty much drove isolationist sentiment. I quite frankly have a lot of trouble with the WWII "poll" but know nothing of its wording or how the question was asked. As you know, these things can be totally meaningless (in January, some polls said Howard Dean could beat Bush "if the election were held today", yet it seems this same guy couldn't be a nominee). Two years after the war perhaps the Marshall Plan discussions were causing a backlash in public opinion??? I'd suspect it had more to do with the usual economic slump that tends to follow such an event. Unemployment was on the rise, estimated commerce was flatlined. The commerce and GNP numbers would take off again a year or two later, but the unemployment numbers continued to rise rather sharply, more than doubling from the 1945 estimate of 1.3% to 3.8% in '47, then almost again to 6.4% in 1949. should really LOVE this one), contrary to popular belief, the percentage of draftees in the service during the Vietnam era was MUCH lower than during WWII (one-third versus two-thirds). This makes sense though. WWII was a huge war compared with Vietnam. The need for bodies was far greater by a large margin, so I'd expect the draftee proportion to be high. Good stuff to make one think. I've seen the book in the bookstore but am now motivated to pick it up next visit. It is a rather interesting read--don't take the wrong idea from the aforementioned dry statistics. Burkett and his coauthor Whitley exposed quite a few charlatan Vietnam vets and "heroes". I happened to be surfing through the TV channels this weekend and watched a bit of the original "First Blood". Burkett's book game me a new way of looking at that movie--I had known that Stallone had neatly avoided military service during the war, but I was surprised to learn that Brian Dennehy, who played the Sheriff, apparently had a propensity for blowing a bit of smoke about his own military service (he has claimed to have been a Vietnam vet, but in actuality he served on Okinawa in the USMC *before* the US sent major ground forces into the conflict). Brooks SMH |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |