![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Z. Bush" wrote in message ... Kevin Brooks wrote: "George Z. Bush" wrote in message ... Kevin Brooks wrote: "George Z. Bush" wrote in message ... We certainly can count on our statisticians to breath life and interest into any subject that catches their eye. (^-^))) Zzzzzzzzzzzzz...snort!!! Did I miss anything? (^-^))) Yeah, you did--a lot of typical misguided preconceived notions about Vietnam veterans getting blown out of the water. Burkett does an even more admirable job on your personal favorite, that "sworn" WSI testimony you keep muttering about. You have two choices here, George--go check the book out from your local library and give it a read, or continue to march with your cherished myths--which will it be? I'll stop babbling when you stop babbling. Deal? You are not going to risk those cherished and false notions regarding WSI, are you? All of that "sworn" (your term) testimony that Kerry/Walinsky based his/their congressional testimony on? Much easier to continue on in blissful ignorance, huh? "Yes" or "No" too hard to pick from? I didn't mean to challenge you; is it a deal or not? Typical George. I asked you up front whether you'd rather read an interesting work that convincingly puts paid to your ridiculous "Kerry's speech before Congress was based upon sworn testimony!" (which you compounded by making that false statement not once but twice in the same post), or whether you'd prefer to float happily along in continuing ignorance of the truth regarding that matter. No surprise that you have chosen the latter--perish the thought of your reading a factual account that by happenstance (Burkett's work was not directed at a guy who was then just another Senator from Kennedyland) casts a pall over the veracity of your new hero's most (in)famous moment. Being afraid of reading the truth (such as the true nature of the WSI "testimony") is one heck of an endorsement for your candidate, George. Brooks George Z. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kevin Brooks wrote:
"George Z. Bush" wrote in message ... Kevin Brooks wrote: "George Z. Bush" wrote in message ... Kevin Brooks wrote: "George Z. Bush" wrote in message ... We certainly can count on our statisticians to breath life and interest into any subject that catches their eye. (^-^))) Zzzzzzzzzzzzz...snort!!! Did I miss anything? (^-^))) Yeah, you did--a lot of typical misguided preconceived notions about Vietnam veterans getting blown out of the water. Burkett does an even more admirable job on your personal favorite, that "sworn" WSI testimony you keep muttering about. You have two choices here, George--go check the book out from your local library and give it a read, or continue to march with your cherished myths--which will it be? I'll stop babbling when you stop babbling. Deal? You are not going to risk those cherished and false notions regarding WSI, are you? All of that "sworn" (your term) testimony that Kerry/Walinsky based his/their congressional testimony on? Much easier to continue on in blissful ignorance, huh? "Yes" or "No" too hard to pick from? I didn't mean to challenge you; is it a deal or not? Typical George. I asked you up front whether you'd rather read an interesting work that convincingly puts paid to your ridiculous "Kerry's speech before Congress was based upon sworn testimony!" (which you compounded by making that false statement not once but twice in the same post), or whether you'd prefer to float happily along in continuing ignorance of the truth regarding that matter. No surprise that you have chosen the latter--perish the thought of your reading a factual account that by happenstance (Burkett's work was not directed at a guy who was then just another Senator from Kennedyland) casts a pall over the veracity of your new hero's most (in)famous moment. Being afraid of reading the truth (such as the true nature of the WSI "testimony") is one heck of an endorsement for your candidate, George. I guess I'll have to take that as a "No", then. You obviously still want to babble on. Well, since you don't want to make a deal with me, and I obviously can't force you to, go right ahead and keep on babbling, just like the proverbial brook. (^-^))) It shouldn't matter to you then if I snooze while you gurgle away. Good night. George Z. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |