A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Ventus bT/cT comparison



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 21st 12, 01:59 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bob Gibbons[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 120
Default Ventus bT/cT comparison

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:43:49 +0000, Peter F
wrote:

At 03:36 18 April 2012, Bob Gibbons wrote:
-- Max gross with or without the engine is 500kg. The issue with the
engine in place is the 255kg non-lifting limit. With the engine in
place, the pilot weight determines whether the max gross of 500kg or
the non-lifting limit of 255kg kicks in first.


You've lost me somewhere.

Why does pilot weight stop you getting to max gross as long as the wing
tanks are big enough?

Assuming tanks *are* big enough to get to max gross without the engine then
it should be a piece of cake to get there *with* the engine.

PF

PF, I agree this was a confusing way to state the impact of the
non-lifting limitation.

What I was trying to convey is the impact of the pilot weight on the
amount of water ballast you can add before hitting the max gross
limit.

As I mentioned, at my weight, I can add 28 gal before reaching max
gross of 500kg. With the engine installed, I am right at the 255kg
non-lifting limit.

On the other hand, if I weighed 20 lbs less, I could add 31 gal of
water before reaching the 500kg limit.

If I took the engine out, I could add 40 gal of water before reaching
the 500kg limit.

Sorry for the confusion.

Bob
  #2  
Old January 20th 14, 08:28 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Ventus bT/cT comparison

Interesting I have bT and my Manual says max. 270 kg for non lifting parts.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yak-38 vs Yak-141 Size Comparison Rob[_6_] Naval Aviation 0 October 8th 10 01:49 AM
Aircraft comparison Jkgoblue Owning 1 November 23rd 05 10:18 PM
F-22 Comparison robert arndt Military Aviation 39 December 4th 03 04:25 PM
Comparison of IFR simulators Chris Kurz Simulators 0 October 27th 03 10:35 AM
EMW A6 Comparison to X-15 robert arndt Military Aviation 8 October 2nd 03 02:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.