Instructors: is no combat better?

In article ,
(ArtKramr) wrote:

ubject: Instructors: is no combat better?
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 3/9/04 3:35 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Instructors: is no combat better?
From: Howard Berkowitz
Date: 3/9/04 1:52 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

In article ,
(ArtKramr) wrote:

Subject: Instructors: is no combat better?
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 3/9/04 10:33 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:


"Seagram" wrote in message
...
Ok tribe members, its time to cast your vote. Who wants Art off
the
island

Nice thread Art, don't let the bottom feeders troll you.

Excellent signal, to all that participated.


I made it through WW II . There is no way the bottom feeders
stand a
chance,
especially the wannabee bottom feeders. But then again all the
wannabees
are
bottom feeders.


Catfish have a biologically useful role. Did you mean lawyers?

Without lawyers there would be no rule of law. There would be no
equal;
protection under the law. There would be no courts and no
constitution.

Be careful what you wish for lest you get it, And what you seem to be
wishing
for can be the end of freedom as we know it. Those who undermine the
lawyers
are undermining the law. And they have agendas that are well worth
examining.
No I am not a lawyer. Be watchful. Justice Thomas has been making
noises
that
may well lead to overturning the 14th amendment. A disaster. Yup. You
hit
a
nerve.

It is rediculess to think that the 14th Amendment would be overturned by
the
SCotUS. The 14th Amendment might be interpreted in light of the fact
that
it was passed to enable the enforcement of the 13th Amendment, to mean
less
than it has in the past, but that is a good thing. After all, the 10th
Amendment is a good thing too.



We have a Supreme Court and an administraiton that wants to limit the
size of
the federal government and return power to the states. The14th amendment
blocks
that.

Ummm...trying to remember...didn't the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments
have a few other effects? And wasn't at least certain aspects of
returning power to the states evaluated, oh, between 1861 and 1865?

Justice Thomas has not exactly been the spiritual or intellectual leader
of the Court.

"Howard Berkowitz" wrote in message
...

snip
Ummm...trying to remember...didn't the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments
have a few other effects? And wasn't at least certain aspects of
returning power to the states evaluated, oh, between 1861 and 1865?

The 15th amendment may as well have not existed for the first 100 years it
was law.

Justice Thomas has not exactly been the spiritual or intellectual leader
of the Court.

If you take the 14th Amendment as a literal application of the Bill of
Rights imposed on the States, then you have to take the 2nd Amendment that
way as well.

Subject: Instructors: is no combat better?
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 3/9/04 4:23 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:


"Howard Berkowitz" wrote in message
...

snip
Ummm...trying to remember...didn't the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments
have a few other effects? And wasn't at least certain aspects of
returning power to the states evaluated, oh, between 1861 and 1865?

The 15th amendment may as well have not existed for the first 100 years it
was law.

Justice Thomas has not exactly been the spiritual or intellectual leader
of the Court.

If you take the 14th Amendment as a literal application of the Bill of
Rights imposed on the States, then you have to take the 2nd Amendment that
way as well.


The general legal wisdom has been that the Buill of Rights does not apply to
the states which is why the 14th amendment was written. "The Bill of Rights: by
Amar is a brilliant work that will give you new insights into the true nature
of the Bill of Rights.


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Instructors: is no combat better?
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 3/9/04 4:23 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:


"Howard Berkowitz" wrote in message
...

snip
Ummm...trying to remember...didn't the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments
have a few other effects? And wasn't at least certain aspects of
returning power to the states evaluated, oh, between 1861 and 1865?

The 15th amendment may as well have not existed for the first 100 years
it
was law.

Justice Thomas has not exactly been the spiritual or intellectual
leader
of the Court.

If you take the 14th Amendment as a literal application of the Bill of
Rights imposed on the States, then you have to take the 2nd Amendment
that
way as well.


The general legal wisdom has been that the Buill of Rights does not
apply to
the states which is why the 14th amendment was written. "The Bill of
Rights: by
Amar is a brilliant work that will give you new insights into the true
nature
of the Bill of Rights.

The Black woman Texas Supreme Court Justice that Bush nominated to the
Federal bench was called a "Neanderthal" by Ted Kennedy for agreeing with
what you wrote, Art.

Subject: Instructors: is no combat better?
From: Howard Berkowitz
Date: 3/9/04 4:06 PM Pacific Standard Time

Justice Thomas has not exactly been the spiritual or intellectual leader
of the Court.

Ah Howard your understatement is poetic.(grin)


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

In article ,
(ArtKramr) wrote:

Subject: Instructors: is no combat better?
From: Howard Berkowitz
Date: 3/9/04 4:06 PM Pacific Standard Time

Justice Thomas has not exactly been the spiritual or intellectual leader
of the Court.

Ah Howard your understatement is poetic.(grin)

Let us count our blessings. You may remember the failed nomination of
Harold Carswell. In general, there were less ideological objections to
him than a general realization he wasn't too bright.

Sen. Roman Hruska (R-Neb) complained in one speech "There are a lot of
mediocre people in this country. Don't they deserve representation too?"

Nebraska didn't have a monopoly on that sort of insight. The
then-senator from my own state, the great Commonwealth of Virginia, Bill
Scott (R), called a press conference to deny allegations he was the
dumbest man in the Senate.

Subject: Instructors: is no combat better?
From: Howard Berkowitz
Date: 3/9/04 5:21 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

In article ,
(ArtKramr) wrote:

Subject: Instructors: is no combat better?
From: Howard Berkowitz
Date: 3/9/04 4:06 PM Pacific Standard Time

Justice Thomas has not exactly been the spiritual or intellectual leader
of the Court.

Ah Howard your understatement is poetic.(grin)

Let us count our blessings. You may remember the failed nomination of
Harold Carswell. In general, there were less ideological objections to
him than a general realization he wasn't too bright.

Sen. Roman Hruska (R-Neb) complained in one speech "There are a lot of
mediocre people in this country. Don't they deserve representation too?"

Nebraska didn't have a monopoly on that sort of insight. The
then-senator from my own state, the great Commonwealth of Virginia, Bill
Scott (R), called a press conference to deny allegations he was the
dumbest man in the Senate.


The mind boggles. (sigh)



Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer