Instructors: is no combat better?

Subject: Instructors: is no combat better?
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 3/9/04 3:49 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

The 14th Amendment does no such thing and should never have been interpreted
to cancel the 10th Amendment. A constructionist view of the Constitution is
best for freedom.



FROM THE 14TH AMENDMENT

"...no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges
or immunities of the United States nor shall any state deprive any citizen of
life liberty or property without due process of law...."

This is the constitution limiting state power. Take this away and state power
is dramatically increased..


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Instructors: is no combat better?
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 3/9/04 3:49 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

The 14th Amendment does no such thing and should never have been
interpreted
to cancel the 10th Amendment. A constructionist view of the Constitution
is
best for freedom.



FROM THE 14TH AMENDMENT

"...no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the
privileges
or immunities of the United States nor shall any state deprive any citizen
of
life liberty or property without due process of law...."

This is the constitution limiting state power. Take this away and state
power
is dramatically increased..

The 14th Amendment was an attmept to enforce the 13th amendment. It was
four years from the ratification of the 13th Amendment until the Andrew
Johnson was stopped from blocking enforcement of the 13th Amendment. all
for the sake of a rew wealthy men.

Note that the 15th Amendment was ratified in 1870, but Congress did not pass
enabling law until 1965.