![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() id est..the design for the engine was stolen from the Brits. The design for Not stolen, GIVEN. Neither stolen nor given, but bought. all the best -- Dan Ford email: (requires authentication) see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No. Stolen. They bought a very small number from the Brits. They then copied
the design illegally, i.e. stolen. "Cub Driver" wrote in message news ![]() id est..the design for the engine was stolen from the Brits. The design for Not stolen, GIVEN. Neither stolen nor given, but bought. all the best -- Dan Ford email: (requires authentication) see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stinky Pete" wrote in message t... No. Stolen. They bought a very small number from the Brits. They then copied the design illegally, i.e. stolen. I thought they were given them rather than any purchase. The Whittle design was done while he was a serving officer and so any rights, patents, etc. rest with the Crown. The UK government of the day didn't make an issue of it, and the person responsible, the then President of the Board of Trade, is now dead, so we can't ask him. I should add that as he went on to become Prime Minister it obviously didn't do his political career any harm either... -- William Black ------------------ Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "William Black" wrote in message ... "Stinky Pete" wrote in message t... No. Stolen. They bought a very small number from the Brits. They then copied the design illegally, i.e. stolen. I thought they were given them rather than any purchase. Incorrect they were sold a number of Nenes and Derwents, RR and the board of trade were hoping for large orders but the Soviets simply copied them The Whittle design was done while he was a serving officer and so any rights, patents, etc. rest with the Crown. Incorrect, the initial patents were indeed lodged in 1930 when he was an RAF officer but they were allowed to lapse in 1936 when Air Ministry decided NOT to pay the fee of £5 required to renew them Whittle got permission from the Air Ministry to found a company, Power Jets which raised further patents under its control and funded the development that made the engine workable. At this point the Government stepped in, handed Whittles work and control of the project to Rolls Royce and nationalised Power Jets leaving Whittle with nothing. The UK government of the day didn't make an issue of it, and the person responsible, the then President of the Board of Trade, is now dead, so we can't ask him. It was the height of the cold war by the time it was realised what had happened and it was scarcely in the Governments interest to let the country know the truth by making a fuss. I should add that as he went on to become Prime Minister it obviously didn't do his political career any harm either... Indeed. Keith |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:36:44 GMT, "Stinky Pete"
wrote: No. Stolen. They bought a very small number from the Brits. They then copied the design illegally, i.e. stolen. You don't know what you're talking about. "They" didn't buy any engines from the Brits. The U.S. was given one Whittle Unit that wasn't airworthy, which GE modified into a working engine. This engine powered the Bell Airacomet, but had no further application. Postwar, a $4 million payment was negotiated with the British government in settlement. The British govt awarded Whittle 100,000 quid and a knighthood, but he was sufficiently annoyed by the whole thing that he relocated to the United States, where he was better appreciated (and paid). www.warbirdforum.com/whittle.htm all the best -- Dan Ford email: (requires authentication) see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cub Driver" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:36:44 GMT, "Stinky Pete" wrote: No. Stolen. They bought a very small number from the Brits. They then copied the design illegally, i.e. stolen. You don't know what you're talking about. "They" didn't buy any engines from the Brits. The U.S. was given one Whittle Unit that wasn't airworthy, which GE modified into a working engine. He was talking about the Soviets. This engine powered the Bell Airacomet, but had no further application. Hardly, Whittle derived engines powered the P-80 amongst other aircraft http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/engines/eng44.htm Postwar, a $4 million payment was negotiated with the British government in settlement. The British govt awarded Whittle 100,000 quid and a knighthood, but he was sufficiently annoyed by the whole thing that he relocated to the United States, where he was better appreciated (and paid). He moved to the USA in 1976 , this was almost 30 years later. Keith |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "Cub Driver" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:36:44 GMT, "Stinky Pete" wrote: No. Stolen. They bought a very small number from the Brits. They then copied the design illegally, i.e. stolen. You don't know what you're talking about. "They" didn't buy any engines from the Brits. The U.S. was given one Whittle Unit that wasn't airworthy, which GE modified into a working engine. He was talking about the Soviets. This engine powered the Bell Airacomet, but had no further application. Hardly, Whittle derived engines powered the P-80 amongst other aircraft http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/engines/eng44.htm Postwar, a $4 million payment was negotiated with the British government in settlement. The British govt awarded Whittle 100,000 quid and a knighthood, but he was sufficiently annoyed by the whole thing that he relocated to the United States, where he was better appreciated (and paid). He moved to the USA in 1976 , this was almost 30 years later. Keith During the war and in the postwar era he spent much of his time consulting and working in the United States, even though his home of record was in Britain. He finally changed that final detail with his divorce. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Russian Air Force Woes - Time to start again? | Peter Kemp | Military Aviation | 31 | February 21st 04 02:10 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | Military Aviation | 120 | January 27th 04 10:19 AM |
US kill loss ratio versus Russian pilots in Korean War? | Rats | Military Aviation | 21 | January 26th 04 08:56 AM |
RUSSIAN WAR PLANES IN ASIA | James | Military Aviation | 2 | October 1st 03 11:25 PM |