![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:34:53 AM UTC-4, Dan Marotta wrote:
This is prompted by someone's description of a flight involving high sink from tow release to landing. The pilot stated that he released from tow in 800 fpm sink at 3,000' AGL. It's so common when I'm towing to have the glider pilot tell me, "I'll take a tow to 3,000 feet." Then, during the tow, I hit super lift and the pilot will hang on to the rope. He'll hang on until I'm struggling through sink and hit the magic 3,000' and release! I shouldn't complain since the higher tow means more income for the operation, but I'd think pilot judgment would include releasing in lift - even if it's below some preconceived release altitude. Now, the instructors will say, "We need the altitude to accomplish the objectives of the flight." I ask, "Wouldn't it better to demonstrate judgment by releasing in strong lift and climbing to altitude to practice maueuvers?" Rant over... I learned to release in lift early in my training (probably first page in the logbook). I'd try releasing and going back to the thermal we'd hit earlier, but could never find it. The instructor told me to release in lift instead. Last year I was climbing nicely in our house thermal. One of our rated (ATP!) pilots was on tow going by me. The tow pilot pointed me out. He stayed on for a couple more minutes, released, and tried to go back to my thermal. I took pity on him, pulled spoilers, and tried to show him the lift. Twice. I climbed up from 1100 AGL finally, and he had a 15 minute flight. It did make for a good ground lesson afterwards... -- Matt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At contests that I attend, we have pre-paid for 2,000' agl tows. Why get off any lower? There's a chance of getting off lower and missing the thermal, then having to work like crazy to get back up to release height, all before the gate has opened. I don't want to have to work before the gate opens; I just want to relax a little and save my concentration to spot the other gliders that are out there. They are marking thermals, so there isn't a need to pull the release below the 2,000' agl mark.
Ray Lovinggood Carrboro, North Carolina, USA |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You missed the point entirely, Ray.
"rlovinggood" wrote in message news:7768138.164.1336763933565.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynff7... At contests that I attend, we have pre-paid for 2,000' agl tows. Why get off any lower? There's a chance of getting off lower and missing the thermal, then having to work like crazy to get back up to release height, all before the gate has opened. I don't want to have to work before the gate opens; I just want to relax a little and save my concentration to spot the other gliders that are out there. They are marking thermals, so there isn't a need to pull the release below the 2,000' agl mark. Ray Lovinggood Carrboro, North Carolina, USA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 10:58:30 PM UTC-4, Dan Marotta wrote:
You missed the point entirely, Ray. That's my standard operating procedure... Ray |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, May 11, 2012 12:18:53 PM UTC-7, rlovinggood wrote:
At contests that I attend, we have pre-paid for 2,000' agl tows. Why get off any lower? There's a chance of getting off lower and missing the thermal, then having to work like crazy to get back up to release height, all before the gate has opened. I don't want to have to work before the gate opens; I just want to relax a little and save my concentration to spot the other gliders that are out there. They are marking thermals, so there isn't a need to pull the release below the 2,000' agl mark. Ray Lovinggood Carrboro, North Carolina, USA 1500' agl in lift is much better place to release than 2000' agl in sink... Ramy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UK2 KN418 Douglas DakotaMkIV 1998-11-13 ex US 44-76512 to 5Y-AAE Rand DaveBeckerPhoto.jpg | Joseph Testagrose | Aviation Photos | 0 | November 26th 11 11:53 AM |
UK2 EX583 NA HarvardMkIIA 1998-10-15 ex US 41-33556 to SAAF 7246 Rand DaveBeckerPhoto.jpg | Joseph Testagrose | Aviation Photos | 0 | September 14th 11 08:38 PM |
a pilot question | [email protected] | Simulators | 19 | April 30th 08 05:37 PM |
RAND report raps Raptor program estimates | Mike | Naval Aviation | 1 | October 19th 05 08:37 PM |
Rand Robinson KR-2 opinions... | Ralph Snart | Home Built | 9 | November 15th 03 11:31 PM |