A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Nano logging issues



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 28th 12, 02:40 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Paul Remde
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,691
Default Nano logging issues

Hi Tony,

The higher baud rate won't hurt, but it probably won't make any difference.
There is plenty of time for the Nano to send all its data every second at
4800 baud.

Paul Remde

"Tony" wrote in message
...

On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 9:45:39 PM UTC-5, Glen Kelley wrote:
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 9:58:30 PM UTC-4, Tony wrote:
i will do that next flight, thanks! Perhaps it will fix my problem of
not getting a Yellow Square too. And btw I must say i'm very thankful
you responded. have had questions with multiple weeks worth of
observations on Naviter's forum for the last 3 weeks and no response!

It would be nice if either the SYM or Nano manual mentioned this for
those of us who aren't computer nerds.

On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 8:20:50 PM UTC-5, Glen Kelley wrote:
Tony,

We are using 19,200. Things should be improved at the higher rate.

Glen


On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 6:25:07 PM UTC-4, Tony wrote:
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 5:18:59 PM UTC-5, Glen Kelley wrote:
Tony, are you sure you have SYM to receive BT/serial from the
Nano? Slow wind computation is symtomati
c of oudie using its internal gps. Winds have been spot-on and
fast using external gps.

yep i had the Oudie set to Serial (COM 4) with standard setting
(4800, N, 1, 1 I think). I actually found that one time when I flew
this year the wind calculations were faster without the external
GPS! Is 4800 an appropriate baud rate? I can crank it up if anyone
thinks it will help.


Tony,

I think it will help. We are have used a GPS16 puck through lxnav v7, and
powerflarm through lxnav v7 - both at 19200 and winds are quick. We
didn't have an external gps for a while and winds took forever and were
often wrong. I'm sure the nano can handle something faster than 4800.

Glen

On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 9:58:30 PM UTC-4, Tony wrote:
i will do that next flight, thanks! Perhaps it will fix my problem of
not getting a Yellow Square too. And btw I must say i'm very thankful
you responded. have had questions with multiple weeks worth of
observations on Naviter's forum for the last 3 weeks and no response!

It would be nice if either the SYM or Nano manual mentioned this for
those of us who aren't computer nerds.

On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 8:20:50 PM UTC-5, Glen Kelley wrote:
Tony,

We are using 19,200. Things should be improved at the higher rate.

Glen


On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 6:25:07 PM UTC-4, Tony wrote:
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 5:18:59 PM UTC-5, Glen Kelley wrote:
Tony, are you sure you have SYM to receive BT/serial from the
Nano? Slow wind computation is symtomati
c of oudie using its internal gps. Winds have been spot-on and
fast using external gps.

yep i had the Oudie set to Serial (COM 4) with standard setting
(4800, N, 1, 1 I think). I actually found that one time when I flew
this year the wind calculations were faster without the external
GPS! Is 4800 an appropriate baud rate? I can crank it up if anyone
thinks it will help.


Glen, Yes the Nano goes up to 115,200 which seems high but the Oudie goes
to 256,000 which must be the Baud Rate equivalent of 11? Set at 19,200 on
both, we'll see how it does. I'm tempted to walk around in a drifting circle
tomorrow after work and see if anyone notices...

  #2  
Old July 1st 12, 12:50 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Nano logging issues

On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 8:40:30 PM UTC-5, Paul Remde wrote:
Hi Tony,

The higher baud rate won't hurt, but it probably won't make any difference.
There is plenty of time for the Nano to send all its data every second at
4800 baud.

Paul Remde

"Tony" wrote in message
...

On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 9:45:39 PM UTC-5, Glen Kelley wrote:
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 9:58:30 PM UTC-4, Tony wrote:
i will do that next flight, thanks! Perhaps it will fix my problem of
not getting a Yellow Square too. And btw I must say i'm very thankful
you responded. have had questions with multiple weeks worth of
observations on Naviter's forum for the last 3 weeks and no response!

It would be nice if either the SYM or Nano manual mentioned this for
those of us who aren't computer nerds.

On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 8:20:50 PM UTC-5, Glen Kelley wrote:
Tony,

We are using 19,200. Things should be improved at the higher rate.

Glen


On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 6:25:07 PM UTC-4, Tony wrote:
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 5:18:59 PM UTC-5, Glen Kelley wrote:
Tony, are you sure you have SYM to receive BT/serial from the
Nano? Slow wind computation is symtomati
c of oudie using its internal gps. Winds have been spot-on and
fast using external gps.

yep i had the Oudie set to Serial (COM 4) with standard setting
(4800, N, 1, 1 I think). I actually found that one time when I flew
this year the wind calculations were faster without the external
GPS! Is 4800 an appropriate baud rate? I can crank it up if anyone
thinks it will help.


Tony,

I think it will help. We are have used a GPS16 puck through lxnav v7, and
powerflarm through lxnav v7 - both at 19200 and winds are quick. We
didn't have an external gps for a while and winds took forever and were
often wrong. I'm sure the nano can handle something faster than 4800.

Glen

On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 9:58:30 PM UTC-4, Tony wrote:
i will do that next flight, thanks! Perhaps it will fix my problem of
not getting a Yellow Square too. And btw I must say i'm very thankful
you responded. have had questions with multiple weeks worth of
observations on Naviter's forum for the last 3 weeks and no response!

It would be nice if either the SYM or Nano manual mentioned this for
those of us who aren't computer nerds.

On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 8:20:50 PM UTC-5, Glen Kelley wrote:
Tony,

We are using 19,200. Things should be improved at the higher rate.

Glen


On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 6:25:07 PM UTC-4, Tony wrote:
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 5:18:59 PM UTC-5, Glen Kelley wrote:
Tony, are you sure you have SYM to receive BT/serial from the
Nano? Slow wind computation is symtomati
c of oudie using its internal gps. Winds have been spot-on and
fast using external gps.

yep i had the Oudie set to Serial (COM 4) with standard setting
(4800, N, 1, 1 I think). I actually found that one time when I flew
this year the wind calculations were faster without the external
GPS! Is 4800 an appropriate baud rate? I can crank it up if anyone
thinks it will help.


Glen, Yes the Nano goes up to 115,200 which seems high but the Oudie goes
to 256,000 which must be the Baud Rate equivalent of 11? Set at 19,200 on
both, we'll see how it does. I'm tempted to walk around in a drifting circle
tomorrow after work and see if anyone notices...


with the 19,200 baud rate on the Nano and Oudie, I had a believable wind calculation in about 3 turns today. Thanks for the idea. Now if I can just figure out when that Yellow Box is supposed to show up...
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Latest Nano update Ventus2NZ Soaring 6 May 22nd 14 02:46 AM
Nano declarations Mike C Soaring 5 April 25th 12 02:18 AM
Is it best to use an Oudie with a Calibri II or a LX Nano....? Michael Marshall Soaring 8 February 7th 12 04:58 PM
Lx NANO and Windows 7 fcnorton Soaring 9 April 2nd 11 02:45 AM
Nano Logger Ed Soaring 7 September 10th 10 08:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.