|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
March 13th 04, 01:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: B-17s at Low Level
From: (WalterM140) Date: 3/12/04 4:35 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: . As I vaguely remember it that hydraulic sytem in a B-17 worked off one engine. That was the Lancaster, Art. One of the virtues of the Fortress so far as battle damage went was that it relied so little on hydraulics for the flight controls. Walt Yeah I knew it was one of the heavies. I ferget which one. Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
| Horsepower required for level flight question... | BllFs6 | Home Built | 17 | March 30th 04 12:18 AM |
| Q for Jim Weir or others: solid state fuel level probes? | Charlie England | Home Built | 11 | March 12th 04 12:35 AM |
| Heads up: threat level going to orange | richard riley | Home Built | 6 | December 23rd 03 10:49 PM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Hybrid Mode
