![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Am Samstag, 21. Juli 2012 06:06:42 UTC+2 schrieb Tom S:
On 7/19/12 3:35 PM, hlt wrote: > This inconsistencies might quite likely result in an disqualification of a pilot. How would this happen if the pilot and scorer both use the same data? Because the data is written in a way that it can be interpreted in different ways. Have a look at an example from the Uvalde data of last weekend, data was now update respectively is no longer available: *## CRYSTAL NORTH ## AN CRYSTAL NORTH 0800-0930 & 1300-1430 TUE-FRI O/T BY NTM AC CTA/CTR AL 6000 ALT AH FL 180 DP 28:38:38 N 099:26:26 W V D=- V X=27:28:43 N 099:25:04 W DB 28:38:38 N 099:26:26 W, 28:20:23 N 100:18:24 W In the case the radius of the arc described by the DB record is 69.739 nm at the beginning and 69.910. In the open air format it is not defined which radius is to be used under these circumstances. As as side remark: The same arc is described in a different data format on the same web page as POINT=N283838 W0992626 ANTI-CLOCKWISE RADIUS=70.00 CENTRE=N272843 W0992504 TO=N282023 W1001824 So the arc definition in open air is not only not unique, it differs in addition also from the definition in the TNP format. The airspace open-air files now at the website use no longer the DB record. The DA record is used in the files currently available for download. With the DA record the Earth model has an even larger impact on the actual position of the arc than with the DB record. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Am Samstag, 21. Juli 2012 10:17:02 UTC+2 schrieb hlt:
In the case the radius of the arc described by the DB record is 69.739 nm at the beginning and 69.910. The words "at the end" are missing at the end of sentence above. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I should have taken the next arc as an example, as the self-consistency in the previous open-air case is resolved, when a spherical Earth is used.
But for the next arc the self-consistency of the open-air arc can not be resolved by a switching from the WGS84 ellipsoid to the FAI spheroid. *## CRYSTAL NORTH ## AN CRYSTAL NORTH 0800-0930 & 1300-1430 TUE-FRI O/T BY NTM AC CTA/CTR AL 6000 ALT AH FL 180 DP 28:38:38 N 099:26:26 W V D=- V X=27:28:43 N 099:25:04 W DB 28:38:38 N 099:26:26 W, 28:20:23 N 100:18:24 W * comment HLT without any warranty * fix start or endpoint of arc as old radii are 69.739 and 69.910 (sphere 69.974 and 69.980 ) DP 28:26:09 N 100:20:26 W V D=- V X=29:21:39 N 100:46:18 W DB 28:26:09 N 100:20:26 W, 28:54:07 N 099:45:24 W * comment HLT without any warranty * fix start or endpoint of arc as old radii are 59.832 and 59.990 * (sphere 59.983 and 59.940 ) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Posting quality | Builder | Home Built | 6 | November 23rd 09 01:07 AM |
100LL Quality | vlado | Piloting | 2 | August 25th 06 07:23 PM |
Manufacturing Quality | john smith | Piloting | 100 | August 13th 06 01:22 PM |
Manufacturing Quality | Jim Carter | Piloting | 16 | August 8th 06 02:15 PM |
What makes a quality mic? | John T | Home Built | 11 | October 10th 05 01:04 AM |