A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Open Class Super-Ship from Windward Performance



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 3rd 12, 06:06 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bob Kuykendall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,345
Default Open Class Super-Ship from Windward Performance

On Aug 3, 10:00*am, wrote:

Why not LSA?


Marc, that's a good question. I think that by the time you develop an
aircraft that meets the LSA requirements, the extra effort to go to
Part 23 TC is not all that great. And the benefits are much greater
gross weight and no smoke-and-mirrors VNE. But I could be convinced
otherwise.

Thanks, Bob K.
  #2  
Old August 3rd 12, 06:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Tony[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,965
Default Open Class Super-Ship from Windward Performance

On Friday, August 3, 2012 12:06:01 PM UTC-5, Bob Kuykendall wrote:
On Aug 3, 10:00*am, wrote: Why not LSA? Marc, that's a good question. I think that by the time you develop an aircraft that meets the LSA requirements, the extra effort to go to Part 23 TC is not all that great. And the benefits are much greater gross weight and no smoke-and-mirrors VNE. But I could be convinced otherwise. Thanks, Bob K.


there are export advantages to not being LSA...as Cessna has learned with the Skycatcher, with which they are pursuing Primary category certification so it can get certified overseas. Yes I expect you to be supplying the european market with trainers in 10 years

This will be the HP-48???
  #3  
Old August 3rd 12, 08:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bob Kuykendall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,345
Default Open Class Super-Ship from Windward Performance

On Aug 3, 10:08*am, Tony wrote:

This will be the HP-48???


The project name is currently "Aurora," for reasons I'll get into
another time. There is as yet no aircraft name or designation.

Thanks, Bob K.
  #4  
Old August 3rd 12, 08:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bob Kuykendall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,345
Default Open Class Super-Ship from Windward Performance

On Aug 3, 10:08*am, Tony wrote:

This will be the HP-48???


Currently it only has the project name "Aurora," for reasons I'll get
into later. There is as yet no aircraft type or designation for it.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Should SSA Regional contests allow water in FAI class...15, 18, 20,Open class? Sean Fidler Soaring 25 December 16th 11 02:14 PM
52/1 Performance in a 15M ship at half the weight. SF Soaring 48 March 1st 09 06:24 PM
Intersted in Std Class Ship for Nationals in Uvalde Bill Elliott Soaring 0 April 10th 06 03:16 PM
UK Open Class and Club Class Nationals - Lasham Steve Dutton Soaring 0 August 6th 03 10:07 PM
Super Cub towplane performance Marc Arsenault Soaring 1 July 11th 03 01:42 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.