Why is a picture ID opposed for voting?

On Aug 12, 2:58*pm, wrote:How many times do
you have to be told that this has nothing to do with identity theft
and nothing to do with polling places?"

your fallacies are not my follies, you say that bs above all you want,
but the only one you are fooling is yourself.

Mandating that a voter show a picture id (driver’s license being the
most common) reveals, name, date of birth, address, driver’s license #
(if card is used), at a place where the voters name and address are
found on a printed list. You are creating a focal point for personal
information, a potential situation for a person/group of people to
stealn formation, based on a mandate that all walk in voters share
personal information. That focal point is a place where close to 70%
of the total voting population will be revealing their personal
information in a 1-day window. The total popular vote for president
in 2008 was just under 130 million, the state of Missouri’s poll
worker instruction manual boasts about its 20,000 poll workers. That’s
quite an opportunity you are creating for lots of money to be stolen
(unintended consequences), based on the ideal of creating a 100% clean
election. Absentee ballots are subject to tampering, so to increase
mail in ballots would not assure a clean election, which means your so
called solution is nothing more than a dodge, in an effort to make
walk in voting 100% clean, you just skipped over the other option,
which is not 100% clean. You did this by using with the statement.
Everything is subject to tampering and that is an entirely separate
issue.” which is an illogical fallacy, based on the fact you are
trying to clean up the election process. Such poor logic on your
part begs the question as to why you think the poll volunteer vetting
process is not subject to flaws/mistakes/misses/tampering. In fact
when pushed your only assurance that identity theft will not occur at
the polling place is that "anal little old ladies" are on duty, which
is pure idiocy on your part. Identity theft protection includes
shredding waste that contains important information so people who go
through a households *TRASH*, have a harder time stealing your
identity. The typical household waste contains food/dog/cat/toiletries
along with the personal information we are told to shred, this sits
and stews a week before it goes to the curb. With today’s cell phone
cameras, one only needs a press of a button to capture an image of the
voter roll (address and voters name), and a good memory for numbers
when inspecting the photo id, to gather such crucial personal
information. So if people are willing to go through a person’s week

In rec.aviation.piloting columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote:
On Aug 12, 2:58Â*pm, wrote:How many times do
you have to be told that this has nothing to do with identity theft
and nothing to do with polling places?"

your fallacies are not my follies, you say that bs above all you want,
but the only one you are fooling is yourself.

Babbling gibberish.

Mandating that a voter show a picture id (driver’s license being the
most common) reveals, name, date of birth, address, driver’s license #
(if card is used), at a place where the voters name and address are
found on a printed list.

Yep, we have agreed to that so why do you keep repeating it like a
babbling idiot?

However, there is no realistic way that mass identity theft can occur
at a polling place, all your links show how difficult it is to perform
any sort of mischief related to voting, and you have no realistic
scenario of how such identity theft could possibly occur.

You just keep arm waving and posting links with nothing to do with
identity theft.