A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

RST 542 comm "help please"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 4th 12, 05:48 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Wayne Paul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 905
Default RST 542 comm "help please"

The FCC currently requires that an aircraft radio has either 720 or 760
channels with 25 KHz spacing. As a result such radios as the 10 channel
Genave Alpha 10 are not on the obsolete radio list, nor are any other radio
with less than 720 channels. They are obsolete by definition. There is a
link that identifies obsolete 720 & 760 radios on the following web page:
http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/ind...craft_stations

Wayne




"aerodyne" wrote in message
...

you are right about the genave 10, but not the 100 or certain models
of the betea. There is a website easily googled that you can check if
the radio is legal. If not, I would buy an older Icom A21 and use the
akaline battery pack which will run 40 hrs on 10 AA's


  #2  
Old October 4th 12, 06:47 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Steve Leonard[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,076
Default Frequency Control

On Thursday, October 4, 2012 11:51:25 AM UTC-5, Wayne wrote:

The FCC currently requires that an aircraft radio has either 720 or 760 channels with 25 KHz spacing. As a result such radios as the 10 channel Genave Alpha 10 are not on the obsolete radio list, nor are any other radio with less than 720 channels. They are obsolete by definition. There is a link that identifies obsolete 720 & 760 radios on the following web page:
http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/ind...craft_stations


Wayne


Drifted a bit from the OPs question. But since it is going this way...

The link that Wayne provided states that the requirement is 30 ppm, and that THE MAJORITY of radios that meet this have either 720 or 760 channels. It does not say that "If you don't have 720 channels or more, it is not to be used for transmiting." It does say that if you have an older radio, it can be updated, but must be done with an FCC Type accepted upgrade kit. You cannot do it by putting in a better crystal, etc. Unless that is the FCC Type Accpeted method for that radio.

At the bottom is a list of Unacceptable Radios. There are many less than 720 channel radios on this list, so I am not willing to accept the "by definition, if it has less than 720 channels, it is obsolete" interpretation. RST radios are not on the list. If it was designed to meet the 30 ppm, why would it not be a legal for use now radio?

Lane, there is at least one RST 6 channel radio here locally. I will check with the owner and see what info is in the manual and maybe have him take a look inside the radio.

Steve Leonard
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"VideO Madness" ( Soldiers...) "GoD Hates FAGS!!! (He sO righteOusly DoES)" Colonel Jake Naval Aviation 0 March 1st 10 12:14 AM
Phrase "landing runway" vs. "cleared to land" Robert M. Gary Piloting 168 February 5th 08 05:32 PM
Phrase "landing runway" vs. "cleared to land" Robert M. Gary Instrument Flight Rules 137 February 5th 08 05:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.