A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

LiFePO4 battery technolocy



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 17th 12, 02:39 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 463
Default LiFePO4 battery technolocy

On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 12:40:54 PM UTC-5, Eric Greenwell wrote:
On 10/16/2012 8:06 AM, Evan Ludeman wrote:



Dear Unknown, Here is the battery I just ordered with the intent to


replace my 10Ah NiMH battery dedicated to the transponder. It is


ready for usage, no soldering except for the fuse and the


plug.http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/s...dproduct=20645






This is a 8400mAh 4S cell with a 30C discharge rate, you can fry your


eggs on the discharge of that thing (over 200A).




I've fooled around with RC model batteries enough to know that I


will never put one of these in my full scale glider. In addition to


chemistry -- we'll presume for the moment that the HK LiFePO4


batteries are discharge & overcharge safe -- there's the issue of


short circuit protection *in* the battery pack. K2 puts all the


balance circuitry and such inside a sealed box where the connections


can be strain relieved, solidly anchored and protected in a way that


simply cannot be done in a hobby pack like this.




Electrically, I like your idea. But mechanically I think it needs


to be more robust.




THe HobbyKing pack is designed toys that don't have people in them. I'd

have more confidence in it if it had a battery management system built

into it and there was a datasheet listing the manufacturer, charging

requirements, cycle life, etc.



--

Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to

email me)


Eric and Evan: you can't have it both ways, either the LiFePo chemistry is safe or it isn't. If you agree that there is no safety difference between the cheap HK cells and those you find in the referenced motorcycle batteries, the fact that HK is used in "toys" should not make a difference. Apropos toys, what do you think the average American Joe is calling our gliders? I will of course encase the HK battery and provide a 5A fuse inside that enclosure before trying it in my glider. I'll let you all know how it goes.
  #2  
Old October 17th 12, 03:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Evan Ludeman[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 484
Default LiFePO4 battery technolocy

On Oct 17, 9:39*am, wrote:
On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 12:40:54 PM UTC-5, Eric Greenwell wrote:
On 10/16/2012 8:06 AM, Evan Ludeman wrote:


Dear Unknown, Here is the battery I just ordered with the intent to


replace my 10Ah NiMH battery dedicated to the transponder. *It is


ready for usage, no soldering except for the fuse and the


plug.http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/s...dproduct=20645


* This is a 8400mAh 4S cell with a 30C discharge rate, you can fry your


* eggs on the discharge of that thing (over 200A).


I've fooled around with RC model batteries enough to know that I


will never put one of these in my full scale glider. *In addition to


chemistry -- we'll presume for the moment that the HK LiFePO4


batteries are discharge & overcharge safe -- there's the issue of


short circuit protection *in* the battery pack. *K2 puts all the


balance circuitry and such inside a sealed box where the connections


can be strain relieved, solidly anchored and protected in a way that


simply cannot be done in a hobby pack like this.


Electrically, I like your idea. *But mechanically I think it needs


to be more robust.


THe HobbyKing pack is designed toys that don't have people in them. I'd


have more confidence in it if it had a battery management system built


into it and there was a datasheet listing the manufacturer, charging


requirements, cycle life, etc.


--


Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to


email me)


Eric and Evan: *you *can't have it both ways, either the LiFePo chemistry is safe or it isn't. *If you agree that there is no safety difference between the cheap HK cells and those you find in the referenced motorcycle batteries, the fact that HK is used in "toys" should not make a difference. *Apropos toys, what do you think the average American Joe is calling our gliders? *I will of course encase the HK battery and provide a 5A fuse inside that enclosure before trying it in my glider. *I'll let you all know how it goes.


Herb: there's a lot to go wrong here that has nothing whatsoever to do
with chemistry, and this was my point. A fuse external to the pack
will do nothing to protect you from an internal short or a short
across one of the cells. Be especially critical of those balance
leads, I've had issues with those on LiPo packs.

We're talking about low probability events here... but event with
potentially high impact. If you install this battery and use it in
your glider, chances are 99%+ that it will work out fine for the next
year.

Here's my second point: this will not prove that this is safe. Humans
are extraordinarily bad at assessing risks in the 0.01 - 1% range. We
do something a little edgy and get away with it 20 times (thermalling
off a ridge with 150' of clearance, let's say) and think "we've got
this figured out"... when statistically we'll almost certainly see it
go wrong if we do that same thing 1000 more times. If ten thousand of
us install those HK batteries, I am confident that we *will* have
problems. Those batteries are designed for high discharge rate
performance and the compromise is safety. This is acceptable for
toys. Much less so for human carrying vehicles.

LiFePO4 cells designed for safety will be far more robust
structurally, and the necessary compromises will be lower performance
and higher cost (more material for the same capacity, better QC,
circuitry for internal charge/discharge regulation and cell balancing,
etc.). It looks like this is what the K2 guys are pursuing.

My $0.02. I'm not a battery engineer, just a skeptical self educated
end user. Sorry if this came off as rock throwing.

Evan Ludeman / T8

  #3  
Old October 17th 12, 10:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,939
Default LiFePO4 battery technolocy

On 10/17/2012 7:35 AM, Evan Ludeman wrote:
On Oct 17, 9:39 am, wrote:


Eric and Evan: you can't have it both ways, either the LiFePo
chemistry is safe or it isn't. If you agree that there is no
safety difference between the cheap HK cells and those you find in
the referenced motorcycle batteries, the fact that HK is used in
"toys" should not make a difference. Apropos toys, what do you
think the average American Joe is calling our gliders? I will of
course encase the HK battery and provide a 5A fuse inside that
enclosure before trying it in my glider. I'll let you all know how
it goes.


Herb: there's a lot to go wrong here that has nothing whatsoever to
do with chemistry, and this was my point. A fuse external to the
pack will do nothing to protect you from an internal short or a
short across one of the cells. Be especially critical of those
balance leads, I've had issues with those on LiPo packs.

We're talking about low probability events here... but event with
potentially high impact. If you install this battery and use it in
your glider, chances are 99%+ that it will work out fine for the
next year.

Here's my second point: this will not prove that this is safe.
Humans are extraordinarily bad at assessing risks in the 0.01 - 1%
range. We do something a little edgy and get away with it 20 times
(thermalling off a ridge with 150' of clearance, let's say) and think
"we've got this figured out"... when statistically we'll almost
certainly see it go wrong if we do that same thing 1000 more times.
If ten thousand of us install those HK batteries, I am confident that
we *will* have problems. Those batteries are designed for high
discharge rate performance and the compromise is safety. This is
acceptable for toys. Much less so for human carrying vehicles.

LiFePO4 cells designed for safety will be far more robust
structurally, and the necessary compromises will be lower
performance and higher cost (more material for the same capacity,
better QC, circuitry for internal charge/discharge regulation and
cell balancing, etc.). It looks like this is what the K2 guys are
pursuing.

My $0.02. I'm not a battery engineer, just a skeptical self
educated end user. Sorry if this came off as rock throwing.

Evan Ludeman / T8


Herb, I completely agree with Evan. The HK batteries were not designed
for our use, there is no evidence they've been tested for our particular
pattern of usage, nor is there a history of successful use for our
purposes.

Given the safety and low cost of SLA batteries, I don't see a compelling
reason to use HK batteries. If a pilot needs more capacity, I suggest
finding a way to add another SLA, or reducing the battery drain so the
present SLA is adequate. At the very least, wait another six months
until the soaring season is near, and see what is on the market then. I
bet there will be better, maybe much better, choices than we have now,
as battery situation is changing quickly.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to
email me)
- "Transponders in Sailplanes - Feb/2010" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarm
http://tinyurl.com/yb3xywl
- "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation Mar/2004" Much of what
you need to know tinyurl.com/yfs7tnz
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LiFePO4 batteries JS Soaring 26 October 15th 12 02:51 PM
LiFePO4 battery ASM Soaring 4 December 6th 11 07:00 PM
Battery 6ah vs. more Roy Clark, \B6\ Soaring 27 April 27th 08 05:01 PM
Battery Connectors Paul Remde Soaring 9 April 9th 06 06:39 PM
Battery for gliders Udo Rumpf Soaring 23 January 19th 05 04:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.