![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 12:40:54 PM UTC-5, Eric Greenwell wrote:
On 10/16/2012 8:06 AM, Evan Ludeman wrote: Dear Unknown, Here is the battery I just ordered with the intent to replace my 10Ah NiMH battery dedicated to the transponder. It is ready for usage, no soldering except for the fuse and the plug.http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/s...dproduct=20645 This is a 8400mAh 4S cell with a 30C discharge rate, you can fry your eggs on the discharge of that thing (over 200A). I've fooled around with RC model batteries enough to know that I will never put one of these in my full scale glider. In addition to chemistry -- we'll presume for the moment that the HK LiFePO4 batteries are discharge & overcharge safe -- there's the issue of short circuit protection *in* the battery pack. K2 puts all the balance circuitry and such inside a sealed box where the connections can be strain relieved, solidly anchored and protected in a way that simply cannot be done in a hobby pack like this. Electrically, I like your idea. But mechanically I think it needs to be more robust. THe HobbyKing pack is designed toys that don't have people in them. I'd have more confidence in it if it had a battery management system built into it and there was a datasheet listing the manufacturer, charging requirements, cycle life, etc. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) Eric and Evan: you can't have it both ways, either the LiFePo chemistry is safe or it isn't. If you agree that there is no safety difference between the cheap HK cells and those you find in the referenced motorcycle batteries, the fact that HK is used in "toys" should not make a difference. Apropos toys, what do you think the average American Joe is calling our gliders? I will of course encase the HK battery and provide a 5A fuse inside that enclosure before trying it in my glider. I'll let you all know how it goes. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 17, 9:39*am, wrote:
On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 12:40:54 PM UTC-5, Eric Greenwell wrote: On 10/16/2012 8:06 AM, Evan Ludeman wrote: Dear Unknown, Here is the battery I just ordered with the intent to replace my 10Ah NiMH battery dedicated to the transponder. *It is ready for usage, no soldering except for the fuse and the plug.http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/s...dproduct=20645 * This is a 8400mAh 4S cell with a 30C discharge rate, you can fry your * eggs on the discharge of that thing (over 200A). I've fooled around with RC model batteries enough to know that I will never put one of these in my full scale glider. *In addition to chemistry -- we'll presume for the moment that the HK LiFePO4 batteries are discharge & overcharge safe -- there's the issue of short circuit protection *in* the battery pack. *K2 puts all the balance circuitry and such inside a sealed box where the connections can be strain relieved, solidly anchored and protected in a way that simply cannot be done in a hobby pack like this. Electrically, I like your idea. *But mechanically I think it needs to be more robust. THe HobbyKing pack is designed toys that don't have people in them. I'd have more confidence in it if it had a battery management system built into it and there was a datasheet listing the manufacturer, charging requirements, cycle life, etc. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) Eric and Evan: *you *can't have it both ways, either the LiFePo chemistry is safe or it isn't. *If you agree that there is no safety difference between the cheap HK cells and those you find in the referenced motorcycle batteries, the fact that HK is used in "toys" should not make a difference. *Apropos toys, what do you think the average American Joe is calling our gliders? *I will of course encase the HK battery and provide a 5A fuse inside that enclosure before trying it in my glider. *I'll let you all know how it goes. Herb: there's a lot to go wrong here that has nothing whatsoever to do with chemistry, and this was my point. A fuse external to the pack will do nothing to protect you from an internal short or a short across one of the cells. Be especially critical of those balance leads, I've had issues with those on LiPo packs. We're talking about low probability events here... but event with potentially high impact. If you install this battery and use it in your glider, chances are 99%+ that it will work out fine for the next year. Here's my second point: this will not prove that this is safe. Humans are extraordinarily bad at assessing risks in the 0.01 - 1% range. We do something a little edgy and get away with it 20 times (thermalling off a ridge with 150' of clearance, let's say) and think "we've got this figured out"... when statistically we'll almost certainly see it go wrong if we do that same thing 1000 more times. If ten thousand of us install those HK batteries, I am confident that we *will* have problems. Those batteries are designed for high discharge rate performance and the compromise is safety. This is acceptable for toys. Much less so for human carrying vehicles. LiFePO4 cells designed for safety will be far more robust structurally, and the necessary compromises will be lower performance and higher cost (more material for the same capacity, better QC, circuitry for internal charge/discharge regulation and cell balancing, etc.). It looks like this is what the K2 guys are pursuing. My $0.02. I'm not a battery engineer, just a skeptical self educated end user. Sorry if this came off as rock throwing. Evan Ludeman / T8 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/17/2012 7:35 AM, Evan Ludeman wrote:
On Oct 17, 9:39 am, wrote: Eric and Evan: you can't have it both ways, either the LiFePo chemistry is safe or it isn't. If you agree that there is no safety difference between the cheap HK cells and those you find in the referenced motorcycle batteries, the fact that HK is used in "toys" should not make a difference. Apropos toys, what do you think the average American Joe is calling our gliders? I will of course encase the HK battery and provide a 5A fuse inside that enclosure before trying it in my glider. I'll let you all know how it goes. Herb: there's a lot to go wrong here that has nothing whatsoever to do with chemistry, and this was my point. A fuse external to the pack will do nothing to protect you from an internal short or a short across one of the cells. Be especially critical of those balance leads, I've had issues with those on LiPo packs. We're talking about low probability events here... but event with potentially high impact. If you install this battery and use it in your glider, chances are 99%+ that it will work out fine for the next year. Here's my second point: this will not prove that this is safe. Humans are extraordinarily bad at assessing risks in the 0.01 - 1% range. We do something a little edgy and get away with it 20 times (thermalling off a ridge with 150' of clearance, let's say) and think "we've got this figured out"... when statistically we'll almost certainly see it go wrong if we do that same thing 1000 more times. If ten thousand of us install those HK batteries, I am confident that we *will* have problems. Those batteries are designed for high discharge rate performance and the compromise is safety. This is acceptable for toys. Much less so for human carrying vehicles. LiFePO4 cells designed for safety will be far more robust structurally, and the necessary compromises will be lower performance and higher cost (more material for the same capacity, better QC, circuitry for internal charge/discharge regulation and cell balancing, etc.). It looks like this is what the K2 guys are pursuing. My $0.02. I'm not a battery engineer, just a skeptical self educated end user. Sorry if this came off as rock throwing. Evan Ludeman / T8 Herb, I completely agree with Evan. The HK batteries were not designed for our use, there is no evidence they've been tested for our particular pattern of usage, nor is there a history of successful use for our purposes. Given the safety and low cost of SLA batteries, I don't see a compelling reason to use HK batteries. If a pilot needs more capacity, I suggest finding a way to add another SLA, or reducing the battery drain so the present SLA is adequate. At the very least, wait another six months until the soaring season is near, and see what is on the market then. I bet there will be better, maybe much better, choices than we have now, as battery situation is changing quickly. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "Transponders in Sailplanes - Feb/2010" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarm http://tinyurl.com/yb3xywl - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation Mar/2004" Much of what you need to know tinyurl.com/yfs7tnz |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
LiFePO4 batteries | JS | Soaring | 26 | October 15th 12 02:51 PM |
LiFePO4 battery | ASM | Soaring | 4 | December 6th 11 07:00 PM |
Battery 6ah vs. more | Roy Clark, \B6\ | Soaring | 27 | April 27th 08 05:01 PM |
Battery Connectors | Paul Remde | Soaring | 9 | April 9th 06 06:39 PM |
Battery for gliders | Udo Rumpf | Soaring | 23 | January 19th 05 04:13 PM |