![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is it correct that the search area in Rieti was 30x100km?
Also, why is the software to perform the search not released? I can see massive time saving potential there... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 17:57 25 October 2012, Roel Baardman wrote:
Is it correct that the search area in Rieti was 30x100km? Also, why is the software to perform the search not released? I can see massive time saving potential there... I think the publication of this English language translation of an existing German document was triggered by an approach I just made to the FLARM folks suggesting a web tool to do exactly this, having bounced the idea off a few experts in the UK gliding movement. I don't claim to have a monopoly on good ideas but I think it would be good to let the small team at FLARM respond to this first. I would not want an enhancement to SECONDARY safety to distract them from the excellent work they do in improving PRIMARY safety. If this idea goes anywhere (and there are some recognised obstacles) I'll report progress. Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
FYI We would be glad to integrate such a functionality in our SkyLines platform
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 17:57 25 October 2012, Roel Baardman wrote:
Is it correct that the search area in Rieti was 30x100km? Also, why is the software to perform the search not released? I can see massive time saving potential there... [sorry if this posts twice - it hadn't appeared after a reasonable wait] I think the publication of this English language translation of an existing German document was triggered by an approach I just made to the FLARM folks suggesting a web tool to do exactly this, having bounced the idea off a few experts in the UK gliding movement. I don't claim to have a monopoly on good ideas but I think it would be good to let the small team at FLARM respond to this first. I would not want an enhancement to SECONDARY safety to distract them from the excellent work they do in improving PRIMARY safety. If this idea goes anywhere (and there are some recognised obstacles) I'll report progress. Paul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flarm v5 | Kevin Neave[_2_] | Soaring | 5 | February 23rd 11 01:35 PM |
Flarm in the US | Steve Freeman | Soaring | 163 | August 15th 10 12:12 AM |
IGC FLARM DLL | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | March 25th 08 11:27 AM |
Flarm | Mal | Soaring | 4 | October 19th 05 08:44 AM |
FLARM | John Galloway | Soaring | 9 | November 27th 04 07:16 AM |