A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

PowerFLARM leeching comments



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 31st 12, 05:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Ramy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 746
Default PowerFLARM leeching comments

On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 2:25:20 PM UTC-7, Don Johnstone wrote:
At 17:13 30 October 2012, folken wrote:

On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 5:00:04 PM UTC+1, Don Johnstone wrote:




I do not disagree with you, FLARM does help, with the emphasis on help,


it




does not replace or indeed lessen the necessity for a good lookout. My




argument was contering the statement that, "The difference between


midairs




and all other cause of accidents is that it is the only type which you


can




do almost nothing to prevent it, except using flarm." which I think you




will agree is a load of total ********. FLARM can assit the aware


pilot,

it




is NOT the answer to preventing mid air collisions.




Statically it is. Midairs, once the number 1 accident cause, are now


almost

nonexistent in Switzerland, since the introduction of Flarm.




You can also assume that no pilot wants a midair collision and maintains


good look out. But there are limitations to the human senses, as stated


by

Gerhard.




We have to stop threating the glider pilot as a luminous all seeing


perfect

elite being. (paron the pun.) We make mistakes. Hundreds each flight. In


fact its a human quality to err.




Yes it helps, it does not provide the answer as the statement to which I

objected intimated it might. The only solution is better lookout and

bettter situational awareness however THAT can be achieved, not replacing

them with technology.



In answer to the assertion that mid-air collisions in Switzerland have been

eradicated, mid air collisions are very very rare and relying on statistics

with such a small sample is futile. As I recall the only mid air I can

recall in Switzerland over recent year was between two FLARM equipped

gliders, go figure.



Here is where technology helps. It maintains its constant SA and fills in


our human attention gaps.




- Folken




I hope no one takes Don comments seriously. It is evident he doesn't know what he is talking about with gems like: midairs are very very rare, see and avoid is the only solution to midairs, flarm was designed for wave etc. Please spare us.

Ramy

Ramy
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Logger on PowerFlarm? LOV2AV8 Soaring 7 July 27th 12 03:18 AM
PowerFLARM Brick and PowerFLARM Remote Display Manuals Available Paul Remde Soaring 30 May 25th 12 11:58 PM
PowerFLARM Paul Remde Soaring 9 November 6th 10 04:30 AM
PowerFLARM Greg Arnold[_2_] Soaring 6 November 2nd 10 09:32 AM
PENTAGON CONSIDERING MILITARY BUILD UP AGAINST IRAN (Scroll down to comments section - see page 2 of the comments section as well): [email protected] Naval Aviation 0 December 19th 06 08:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.