![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Corky
A bit of BD5 trivia. When Jim first built the bird and during the test phase (which continued after he had started selling kits) they experienced a number of engine failures with the German/Austrian (forget the name) engine. Basic problem, as I remember, was that when throttle was put in idle for long period in landing pattern, there was not enough oil going through the engine to keep it from freezing up. As bird made pattern the prop would keep engine RPM up and with only the oil from idle throttle bad happened. In a snowmobile application (which engine came out of) this never happened because engine was not spun up like it was with the prop.. Was going back to Iowa to visit family and stopped by and spoke with Jim about this. Suggested that he use an engine that had oil injection vs the mixed fuel/oil normally used in a two cycle. Would have solved his problem. The only problem was that he had a contract (with a low price) with the engine manufacturer that he couldn't get out of and they didn't want to or couldn't make (without making major redesign $$$$$) changes to the engine (or something like that) so history came to pass. If the original engine had worked and Jim had delivered with all the kits sold, would have been a lot more built (and possibly deaths as you say, hot bird, high stall speed, even with the 'B' wing, etc.) Thought seriously about building one (ex Fighter Pilot) but then all the problems came up and decided against (I'm dumb but not stupid and know when to cut my losses). Big John On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 13:57:03 GMT, (Corky Scott) wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 23:23:22 -0600, Big John wrote: No one has posted a follow up with the name of the BD5 pilot, and details of the accident (1000 ft short on final). You don't see many BD5 accidents but there are not a lot flying so statically the accident rate is probably pretty high vs other homebuilts with a lot completed and flying? Man those BD5's just don't seem like a good idea. Tiny, high stall speed, tight engine compartment, and the pilot sits right on the bottom of the fuselage. The airplane has been discussed in this group previously and my recollection is that it has a very high fatal accident rate. It's first flight accident rate is also very high. Perhaps Ron Wanttaja can step in with his always meticulous statistical analysis. Corky Scott |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|