~ Bush: "I'm God's Delivery Boy" ~

After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, "Tarver
Engineering" confessed the following:

The Constitution guarantees the "free expression thereof" and what you are
claiming as a right is the repression of the constitutional rights of
others, Guy.

You are one seriously f*cked up dude. You have the right to watch gay
porn...I have the right NOT to watch. You have the right to worship as
you choose...I have the right NOT to worship.

It is you that is attacking the civil rights of others, Guy.

It bears repeating...you are one seriously f*cked up dude. Funny, but
mo' debly f*cked up.

Juvat

"Robey Price" wrote in message
...
After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, "Tarver
Engineering" confessed the following:

The Constitution guarantees the "free expression thereof" and what you
are
claiming as a right is the repression of the constitutional rights of
others, Guy.

You are one seriously f*cked up dude. You have the right to watch gay
porn...I have the right NOT to watch. You have the right to worship as
you choose...I have the right NOT to worship.

But you have no right to interfere in the "free exercise thereof" WRT
religion. Your gay tendancies are of no interest to me.

It is you that is attacking the civil rights of others, Guy.

It bears repeating...you are one seriously f*cked up dude. Funny, but
mo' debly f*cked up.

Geological evidence indicates that if evolution occurs at all it must do so
within a single generation, completely falsifying the entire notion of a
slow emergence of a new species over time.

After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, "Tarver
Engineering" confessed the following:

But you have no right to interfere in the "free exercise thereof" WRT
religion.

I'm not...Guy's not...believe what you want, worship as you want. Be
my guest. My lack of faith, my desire to be free from religion,
doesn't interfere with you right to worship.

JT you're just being silly.

Your gay tendancies are of no interest to me.

Actually that'd be your gay tendencies...and that's okay with me too.
Whatever you do with another consenting adult is your business.

Geological evidence indicates that if evolution occurs at all it must do so
within a single generation, completely falsifying the entire notion of a
slow emergence of a new species over time.

What's it gonna be JT. Stop waffling and pick a position. "If"
evolution occurs?

You've already told us evolution has been discredited by Einstein (the
gentleman of Quantum physics and relativity) now you're suggesting
there may be something to, as you called it, "dog breeder science."

You're just being silly. I could care less if you choose Dawkins or
Gould, they disagree about the details of evolution, but they both
support evolution over creationism. I have no problem with that. Those
differing opinions are interesting, but I don't care about the
specifics. There is so much out there I find more interesting and the
autodidact in me has a limited amount of time to spend on "finding
things out."

Which all goes back to the point, your religious beliefs are your
beliefs. I don't want to take those away from you or anybody. Trying
to transform this great country into some christian state would be as
dangerous to the world as a proliferation of islamist states. So keep
religion out of government.

Juvat

"Robey Price" wrote in message
...
After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, "Tarver
Engineering" confessed the following:

But you have no right to interfere in the "free exercise thereof" WRT
religion.

I'm not...Guy's not...believe what you want, worship as you want. Be
my guest. My lack of faith, my desire to be free from religion,
doesn't interfere with you right to worship.

JT you're just being silly.

Sure, but I made you laugh.

Your gay tendancies are of no interest to me.

Actually that'd be your gay tendencies...and that's okay with me too.
Whatever you do with another consenting adult is your business.

Such projection.

Geological evidence indicates that if evolution occurs at all it must do
so
within a single generation, completely falsifying the entire notion of a
slow emergence of a new species over time.

What's it gonna be JT. Stop waffling and pick a position. "If"
evolution occurs?

Hey, I'm just presenting science.

You've already told us evolution has been discredited by Einstein (the
gentleman of Quantum physics and relativity) now you're suggesting
there may be something to, as you called it, "dog breeder science."

No, I am pointing out that the notional hypothesis of species occuring over
a long peoriod of natural selection is disputed by physical geological
evidence. The quantum physics stuff is just experimenatally demonstrable
and repeatable.

You're just being silly. I could care less if you choose Dawkins or
Gould, they disagree about the details of evolution, but they both
support evolution over creationism. I have no problem with that. Those
differing opinions are interesting, but I don't care about the
specifics. There is so much out there I find more interesting and the
autodidact in me has a limited amount of time to spend on "finding
things out."

Fast evolution rapidly approaches creation, to a casual observer.

Jay Gould believes in God now.

Which all goes back to the point, your religious beliefs are your
beliefs. I don't want to take those away from you or anybody. Trying
to transform this great country into some christian state would be as
dangerous to the world as a proliferation of islamist states. So keep
religion out of government.

I am not posting religion, you are.

After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, "Tarver
Engineering" confessed the following:

Hey, I'm just presenting science.

According to Michael Denton?

You've already told us evolution has been discredited by Einstein (the
gentleman of Quantum physics and relativity) now you're suggesting
there may be something to, as you called it, "dog breeder science."

No, I am pointing out that the notional hypothesis of species occuring over
a long peoriod of natural selection is disputed by physical geological
evidence.

This is a hoot!

Too funny, this is actually hilarious. You are summarizing part of
Gould's position between Punctuated Equilibrium and his concept of
"phyletic gradualism."

Apparently you think the crux of evolution is "the notional hypothesis
of species occuring over a long period of natural selection." I'm
guessing your emphasis in "long period." That would only be an
aspect/theory of a mechanism of evolution, but...evolution is still a
fact.

Fast evolution rapidly approaches creation, to a casual observer.

Fast evolution? You mean Gould's & Eldredge's Punctuated Equilibrium
that:

PE postulates that speciation events comprise most of the evolutionary
change seen in adaptation.

PE explains the abrupt appearance of new species in the fossil record.

PE explains the relative stasis of most species.

PE asserts "species selection" as the way in which major adaptive
trends proceed.

PE also makes a statement concerning the pattern of fossils found.

Jay Gould believes in God now.

Too funny, sounds like you believe in Jay Gould and Punctuated
Equilibrium.

I am not posting religion, you are.

Well alert your ISP 'cause somebody posting with your IP adress
asserted in this thread that society without religion leads to
psycosis; and our (Guy and me) freedom FROM religion in the US is a
violation of the 1st Amendment rights of believers.

Juvat

"Robey Price" wrote in message
...
After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, "Tarver
Engineering" confessed the following:

Hey, I'm just presenting science.

According to Michael Denton?

You've already told us evolution has been discredited by Einstein (the
gentleman of Quantum physics and relativity) now you're suggesting
there may be something to, as you called it, "dog breeder science."

No, I am pointing out that the notional hypothesis of species occuring
over
a long peoriod of natural selection is disputed by physical geological
evidence.

This is a hoot!

Too funny, this is actually hilarious. You are summarizing part of
Gould's position between Punctuated Equilibrium and his concept of
"phyletic gradualism."

Gould's attempts to band aid together a plausable mechanism to replace
Darwin's impossible one is what was hillarious.

Apparently you think the crux of evolution is "the notional hypothesis
of species occuring over a long period of natural selection." I'm
guessing your emphasis in "long period." That would only be an
aspect/theory of a mechanism of evolution, but...evolution is still a
fact.

Once the period becomes short enough it is Creation.

Fast evolution rapidly approaches creation, to a casual observer.

Fast evolution? You mean Gould's & Eldredge's Punctuated Equilibrium
that:

PE postulates that speciation events comprise most of the evolutionary
change seen in adaptation.

PE explains the abrupt appearance of new species in the fossil record.

PE explains the relative stasis of most species.

PE asserts "species selection" as the way in which major adaptive
trends proceed.

PE also makes a statement concerning the pattern of fossils found.

Nice band aids, but evolution becomes creation when explaining the fosil
record that way.

Jay Gould believes in God now.

Too funny, sounds like you believe in Jay Gould and Punctuated
Equilibrium.

I believe Jay Gould made a frantic attempt to bring evolution into line with
the fosil record, due to physical evidence proving Dariwin's notional
hypotesis WRT the origin of species was false. Even in the evolutionist's
odd world where the scientific method has a different definition than all of
the rest of science, the criterion of "falsability" is demonstrated in that
Darwin's idea is undoubtably false.

I am not posting religion, you are.

Well alert your ISP 'cause somebody posting with your IP adress
asserted in this thread that society without religion leads to
psycosis; and our (Guy and me) freedom FROM religion in the US is a
violation of the 1st Amendment rights of believers.

My assertion is a concept directly from Freudian psycology and is science,
not religion.

After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, "Tarver
Engineering" confessed the following:

Gould's attempts to band aid together a plausable mechanism to replace
Darwin's impossible one is what was hillarious.

Gould's "The Structure of Evolutionary Theory" at 1474 pages, some
band-aid.

Once the period becomes short enough it is Creation.

This is too funny. How short is this period? And when did creation
occur?

[snip the short strokes of punctuated equilibrium]

Nice band aids, but evolution becomes creation when explaining the fosil
record that way.

Quoi? JT are you trying to tell us you believe in "creation science?"

A simple Yes or No will do.

Even in the evolutionist's odd world where the scientific method
has a different definition than all of the rest of science,
the criterion of "falsability" is demonstrated in that
Darwin's idea is undoubtably false.

JT evolution is a fact...we see evidence all around us every day. The
specific mechanisms of natural selection and evolution are debated all
the time.

My assertion is a concept directly from Freudian psycology and is science,
not religion.

OK...Frued.

Again please clarify for me, are you implying you believe the
so-called "creation science?" An answer would go a long way in
understanding your posts.

Juvat