![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 16:15 17 December 2012, Wallace Berry wrote:
In article , wrote: On Sunday, December 16, 2012 12:05:45 PM UTC-5, wrote: Reading the latest Rules Committee meeting minutes I see item number 14 slips a "tax" in the rules. $50 charge by waiver for any contest pilot showing up without a crew. Note it is $50 PER DAY! This was not included in the pilot poll, we currently have a sanctioning fee surplus, the minutes state that almost all of the 2012 contests reported a profit. Is it productive to increase contest fees by $300 for participants? Will this create more or less participation in regionals? Is there really an unbearable burden placed on contest organizers when it comes to crewless pilots? As an active contest pilot with a wife that participates 50% of the time I have found that my "friend pool" has done an effective job of retrieving for each other. We make the required call to the retrieve office but in reality we arrange our own retrieves. If you feel that the $300 "tax" is unwarranted please voice your opinion. Lane XF Possibly the word "tax" should be replaced with "penalty". And possibly the rules committee is stating that they neither encourage or prohibit such a charge but are in fact neutral. I just want to squish this counterproductive idea right now! Lane XF Thanks for catching this and bringing to wider attention, Lane. Any contest charging $300 for showing up crewless would not have me as an entrant. For starters, I suspect that such a contest would not draw enough entrants to make in the first place. Second, I can't afford it. Not everyone flying contests has a $100k rig with bucks to spare. WB Flying a roughly Libelle shaped pile of fiberglass, with a B-40 as the most sophisticated instrument in the panel, and a 25 year-old crew vehicle. Now if there was a $50 'Au Vache' charge which was passed on without deduction to the unfortunate who has to retrieve you, it would seem only fair. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() vehicle. Now if there was a $50 'Au Vache' charge which was passed on without deduction to the unfortunate who has to retrieve you, it would seem only fair. Isn't it already customary to buy the retrieve crew dinner? Heck, if I had $50 for every time I have retrieved someone else, I could have almost paid for all of the times I have been retrieved. --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Not user fees anymore, service fees... | Blueskies | Owning | 36 | October 1st 07 05:14 PM |
House Says No To User Fees, Yes to Fuel Tax Increase | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 1 | September 26th 07 01:19 PM |
Not user fees anymore, service fees... | Blueskies | Piloting | 35 | August 4th 07 02:09 PM |
Not user fees anymore, service fees... | Blueskies | Home Built | 35 | August 4th 07 02:09 PM |
Potential OSH Entertainment | EDR | Piloting | 9 | July 3rd 04 06:22 AM |