![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No SPAM wrote:
In article , says... If AQ had them for some time, they'd have used them by now. And would not have been wasting their time trying to foment "dirty bomb" plots. Not especially. Even al qaeda has a sense of public relations. Blowing up innocent civilians in Western countries is acceptable to most of the people al qaeda are targeting as their "audience'; i.e., jihadists against the West. However, a good argument could be made that use of a nuke against a Western country would loose al qaeda the support of many currently moderate Middle Eastern/Southwest Asia countries, and potentially hurt their image with the typical man on (their) street. It would also definitely change the opinion of many of the moderate countries world-wide that are unhappy with the US and its recent actions; it could swing world-wide opinion back similiar to that of just after 9/11 when the US enjoyed nearly world-wide support. In short, it could hurt their 'cause' far more than help it. Good insight! Just like 9/11. Vot? Grantland |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Briefcase and Me | Bob McKellar | Military Aviation | 11 | December 24th 03 11:57 PM |