![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Windhorst" wrote in message ... Kevin Brooks wrote: snip No, the term "suitcase nuke" became a common (and misunderstood) term when Alexander Lebed came out with his since-discredited claims that the GRU/KGB had built numerous very small devices that could supposedly fit into a briefcase/suitase size satchel and of which some number were supposedly unaccounted for. One congressional committee even saw an extraordinary "mockup" of this fantastic "weapon". None of this has ever panned out as being based in real fact. Brooks Given the old Soviet propensity of duplicating, or attempting to duplicate, so many Western weapons systems, if only on the principle that if we had it they'd better have it too because even if they couldn't immediately see the utility of the system in question, no need to take chances (i.e., they couldn't afford to foster a "suitcase gap") -- how likely is it that they _wouldn't_ have developed such a device? Being as we have seen no cridible evidence that they did (and we have seen photos, accounts, etc., of their nuclear weapons developments since the fall of the Soviet Union), and knowing that they did indeed have some problem providing the materiel for all of the warheads they *did* want, the burden of proof is on those who are claiming they did have these things. So far, Lebed and his followers have been long on talk, short on proof. Brooks David Windhorst |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Briefcase and Me | Bob McKellar | Military Aviation | 11 | December 24th 03 11:57 PM |