Is the 787 a failure ?

"Mr.B1ack" wrote:

On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 22:21:55 -0600, F. George McDuffee wrote:

When you want it really really bad, that's generally how you get it...
-----------------------

On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:54:55 -0600, "Mr.B1ack" wrote:

snip
Now from a business point of view however ...
snip

These URLs may be of interest. If an emergency is defined as an event
that was unanticipated in occupance and limited in duration, clearly
this is no emergency.

That's TECHNICAL ... "legal" ... has NOTHING to do
with how potential passengers should act or react.

Passengers are convinced the 787 is a death-trap.
That's ALL it takes to destroy it.


All planes are death traps. You can't pull over to a cloud & call for
a tow, for any of them.

On Jan 26, 11:28*am, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:
"Mr.B1ack" wrote:

On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 22:21:55 -0600, F. George McDuffee wrote:

When you want it really really bad, that's generally how you get it....
-----------------------

On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:54:55 -0600, "Mr.B1ack" wrote:

snip
Now from a business point of view however ...
snip

These URLs may be of interest. *If an emergency is defined as an event
that was unanticipated in occupance and limited in duration, clearly
this is no emergency.

* *That's TECHNICAL ... "legal" ... has NOTHING to do
* *with how potential passengers should act or react.

* *Passengers are convinced the 787 is a death-trap.
* *That's ALL it takes to destroy it.

* *All planes are death traps.

No, this isn't the 1930's anymore.

You can't pull over to a cloud & call for a tow, for any of them.

Since then, you hardly ever have crashes because of all-weather
designs, flight patterns and glide paths (in case you need to land).