![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, February 14, 2013 4:24:54 PM UTC-8, Bill D wrote:
On Thursday, February 14, 2013 3:19:21 PM UTC-7, Kimmo Hytoenen wrote: After Argentina some competition pilots were quite disappointed with the new variometers using acceleration to calculate lift. I have not tested myself, just telling their opinion. At 21:49 14 February 2013, John Galloway wrote: If the butterfly -- or clearnav, with future software -- did read out 3 d w= ind 20 times a second, this would be a big advantage. Not only could you de= tect lift long before F =3D MA gets the glider moving upward, you could tel= l upward gusts from forward gusts and sideways gusts. Dynamic soaring might= even become possible, or at least better energy extraction from gusts. Eve= n the 302 has the necessary sensors, my impression is that we're all waitin= g on the software development.=20 John Cochrane Regarding gusts, the Butterfly website (in FAQ) already claims: "A conventional variometer uses changes in air pressure (TE- pressure, static- and total-pressure) to determine energy changes the aircraft experiences. Butterfly Vario does the same. Additionally it uses an inertial sensing platform that allows for real-time determination of airmass-movement and realtime determination of wind. With this technology a pilot can judge the difference between gust induced energy changes and thermal induced energy changes." John Galloway Not sure, but I suspect they are mixing frames of reference. In theory, the way to do this is solve the TE equations in the inertial and air-data domains separately then compare them. A gust will show up strongly in the air-data but less so in the inertial data so a computer - or a pilot - can tell the difference. A purely inertial vario will require a full IMU with GPS updating. These things are probably still too expensive for sailplanes but only just. Sparkfun has several IMU systems under $150: https://www.sparkfun.com/categories/160 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: 57mm Cambridge Vario/FS: 80mm Cambridge Vario | ufmechanic | Soaring | 0 | March 24th 09 05:31 PM |
Martin Mars, Performing Live In Downtown Vancouver! | Zomby Woof | Aviation Photos | 3 | January 20th 08 03:10 PM |
Martin Mars, Performing Live In Downtown Vancouver! | Zomby Woof | Naval Aviation | 2 | January 11th 08 06:10 PM |
Navy Performing Well, Keeps Eye on Future Force | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | February 14th 05 10:06 PM |
AN-2 performing a loop | Maro_SK | Aerobatics | 1 | March 25th 04 08:18 PM |