![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 02:03:36 GMT, Charles Gray wrote:
I'm more interested in the big middle finger this seems to have sent the US way-- Sharon really seems intent on proving that he is not beholden in any way shape or form to U.S. preassure Here's another view on what this killing is all about: http://denbeste.nu/cd_log_entries/2004/03/AngeringthePalestinians.shtml In summary, wall off the insurgents, kill off the leaders, let them fight and murder themselves as each group tries to establish authority. -Jeff B. yeff at erols dot com |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Chad Irby wrote: In article , K. A. Cannon wrote: What ever happened to peaceful civil disobedience protests? What the **** would Israel do if the Palestinians ever get a Martin Luther King? They'd probably get to bury him after Hamas kills him. After observing this situation for a while I agree that the most effective way for the Palestinians to get Isreal to give them more of what they demand is to go peacenik. At the begining of Clancy's book "Sum of all Fears" he has the Palestinians doing this. If Isreal failed to get on the brakes fast enough and tone down their side of the dispute, world opinion would quickly swing against them. TV footage of Palestinians being hurt or killed by Isreali bulldozers or tanks would be far more helpful to their cause then marterdom. The Hamas leaders probably know this but the strugle gives them an important role in their power structure and continuing the strugle for as long as they can milk it. Fighting Isreal gives them power, beating Isreal will take away their power. The rhetoric they use to stir up the crowds is just a convenient tool to manipulate the situation. By now, the leaders of Isreal must realize that this is the true situation. Their population is being used as bomber fodder for the internal power struggle between Hamas and the other factions in the occupied areas. This strugle also keeps much of the rest of the middle east concentrating on places other than their own countries. The "Opression" of the Palestinians by the Isrealies distracts them from their own bananna republic existance. Knowing that Hamas, or its replacement must keep fighting to maintain their own internal roles, Isreal can use the continued fighting as an excuse to continually expel more Palestinians from the west bank and Gaza until isreal expels them all and settles all the disputed areas with Isrealies. Hamas' fighting only helps to speed the process. I wonder if the rest of the Palestinians will ever figure this out? -- Dana Miller |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Charles Gray wrote: The isreali Palestinian conflict seems to have one main theme-- whenever one side is seriouly ready to make a deal, the other decides it doesnt' want to. It's been more obvious on the Palestinian side, but the Isreali's have also missed many chances to bolster the moderates (back when such a thing existed). Mostly because every time the peace process gets started, one side or the other sends in suicide bombers. Oh, wait, that's just the *one* side. If the Palestinians ever wanted to make a deal, they'd shut down Hamas and related groups. They don't. -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Dana Miller wrote: Knowing that Hamas, or its replacement must keep fighting to maintain their own internal roles, Isreal can use the continued fighting as an excuse to continually expel more Palestinians from the west bank and Gaza until isreal expels them all and settles all the disputed areas with Isrealies. Hamas' fighting only helps to speed the process. Considering that "speeding the process" of expulsion has, over the last thirty-seven year, resulted in about four times as many Palestinians, I don't think that's the issue. The number of Palestinians that have been expelled is a drop in the bucket compared to the number that have moved in. -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 04:08:51 GMT, Chad Irby wrote:
In article , Charles Gray wrote: The isreali Palestinian conflict seems to have one main theme-- whenever one side is seriouly ready to make a deal, the other decides it doesnt' want to. It's been more obvious on the Palestinian side, but the Isreali's have also missed many chances to bolster the moderates (back when such a thing existed). Mostly because every time the peace process gets started, one side or the other sends in suicide bombers. Oh, wait, that's just the *one* side. If the Palestinians ever wanted to make a deal, they'd shut down Hamas and related groups. They don't. Or one side decides to play "Kick out the injun" with a new settlement, or expansion of one or two, or the settlers go off on a spree of beating up Palestinians. Curiously, the U.S. media seldom reports those incidents... |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Charles Gray wrote: Or one side decides to play "Kick out the injun" with a new settlement, or expansion of one or two, or the settlers go off on a spree of beating up Palestinians. Curiously, the U.S. media seldom reports those incidents... Really? I see it covered all over the place whenever that sort of thing happens. Oddly enough, there was damned little coverage of this recent round of dismantling settlements and dragging the settlers back. -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Could someone please tell me what missiles were used to kill Sheikh
Ahmed Yassin? I'm thinking that the Israelis fired Hydra-70 rockets at him and his handlers. I can't believe that they would have used Hellfires. Thanks. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message news:_ql8c.3159$%w2.1454@clgrps13... In us.military.army Ragnar wrote: Those guys NEVER do the suicide dance - they convince other people to do it. Little convincing is necessary when you've had your arms broken by Israeli soldiers at age 14, seen your brother kidnapped, held, and tortured, watched your sister shot by a sniper, and then had your house bulldozed. So all of the suicide bombers had that happen to them? No. Each bomber has their own motivations and circumstances. I'm a fairly peacefuly person, but if a party did that to me and mine, I'd pull out all of the stops to hurt he and his - I don't think many of us would be much different. And your scenario only works for a limited number of bombers. The others are convinced by people like wheelchair man to do the suicide dance. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 06:14:05 GMT, Chad Irby wrote:
In article , Charles Gray wrote: Or one side decides to play "Kick out the injun" with a new settlement, or expansion of one or two, or the settlers go off on a spree of beating up Palestinians. Curiously, the U.S. media seldom reports those incidents... Really? I see it covered all over the place whenever that sort of thing happens. Oddly enough, there was damned little coverage of this recent round of dismantling settlements and dragging the settlers back. I actually wasn't aware that there had been a new round-- were they large settlments or the unapproved settlements that had popped up a few years back. Next to the suicide bombings, the Settlemetns are some of the biggest problems around-- I wonder if Likud expected this when they started the big push in the 1980's, or if it was more a "reward people who will support us things". One question I haven't been able to find any answers, is that presuming the Isreali government dismantles ALL settlements next week, can they afford to compensate the settlers? You can talk all day about them being illegal, but the people would still have to have housing and such provided them, at government expense, and I don't know if the Isreali economy could currently handle that expense. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Keith Willshaw" wrote :
The Taliban didnt EXIST when the Soviets were around. It emerged as a movement in 1994, several years after the USSR had ceased to exist let alone occupy Afghanistan. They only had a different name. Mudjahedins, and then they were called freedom fighters :-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Israel murders disabled people... whats next i wonder IDF-Apachefiring missiles on 67yr old civilian in wheelchair- at Sabra mosque inGaza... | Aerophotos | Military Aviation | 52 | March 29th 04 04:01 AM |
Poland: French Missile Report Was Wrong | Michael Petukhov | Military Aviation | 8 | October 7th 03 10:54 PM |