![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, May 24, 2013 10:04:27 AM UTC-4, Evan Ludeman wrote:
Man, what a pain in the ass at Mifflin. Returning on the back side of Jacks with weak ridge and no thermals, you leave the ridge at 1900-2000 because you *cannot* get higher and fly through a ton of sink (netto 4 - 6 kts down is common). The closest point of the ridge to the edge of the finish cylinder is 1.6 SM and the 700' agl finish is 1520. You'd probably prefer to cut the corner if energy allows, but that makes the distance more like 3 miles. Twice I was hanging on my flaps at 42 kts at what I guessed to be the edge of the cylinder (when the gps says 1.0 mile, you've generally finished several seconds earlier). Eyes on the panel, about 1530 feet, right in the GA traffic pattern (amazing how many GA pilots don't read Notams and show up at closed airports!). This is safer than an eyes out finish at lower altitude? I don't think so. I fly a '20. What's a Libelle pilot supposed to do in that situation? We never found out because none of the low performance guys had to try to make this work. I don't have a problem with penalizing actual unsafe flying. However, we're now erring on the side of penalizing (severely) *potentially* unsafe flying. Two guys I know of (there may have been others) drew no speed points after hitting the cylinder below 1320 agl. In both cases the airport arrivals were reasonable energy and safe. Evan Ludeman / T8 Can’t we allll, just have a line? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, May 24, 2013 4:15:17 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Friday, May 24, 2013 10:04:27 AM UTC-4, Evan Ludeman wrote: Man, what a pain in the ass at Mifflin. Returning on the back side of Jacks with weak ridge and no thermals, you leave the ridge at 1900-2000 because you *cannot* get higher and fly through a ton of sink (netto 4 - 6 kts down is common). The closest point of the ridge to the edge of the finish cylinder is 1.6 SM and the 700' agl finish is 1520. You'd probably prefer to cut the corner if energy allows, but that makes the distance more like 3 miles.. Twice I was hanging on my flaps at 42 kts at what I guessed to be the edge of the cylinder (when the gps says 1.0 mile, you've generally finished several seconds earlier). Eyes on the panel, about 1530 feet, right in the GA traffic pattern (amazing how many GA pilots don't read Notams and show up at closed airports!). This is safer than an eyes out finish at lower altitude? I don't think so. I fly a '20. What's a Libelle pilot supposed to do in that situation? We never found out because none of the low performance guys had to try to make this work. I don't have a problem with penalizing actual unsafe flying. However, we're now erring on the side of penalizing (severely) *potentially* unsafe flying. Two guys I know of (there may have been others) drew no speed points after hitting the cylinder below 1320 agl. In both cases the airport arrivals were reasonable energy and safe. Evan Ludeman / T8 Can’t we allll, just have a line? Yes you can in nationals and regionals that do not have a Sports class. More fun, no finish height penalties, incrementally less safe. UH |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
750 mile flights in Tennessee | Chilhowee | Soaring | 2 | April 10th 07 05:28 AM |
1,000 mile ridge flight 4-05-07 | [email protected] | Soaring | 5 | April 8th 07 01:09 PM |
24,000 mile scenic? | Roger Long | Piloting | 19 | February 9th 05 08:28 PM |
Three Mile Island Photos | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 4 | February 15th 04 05:25 PM |
ADV: MIle High supplier | David Campbell | Soaring | 0 | August 7th 03 02:16 AM |