![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Peter Kemp wrote: On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:51:28 GMT, Ron Parsons wrote: The only reason that AAL has Airbus aircraft in the fleet is that it was a requirment in order to gain landing rights in Europe. Got a cite for this? Considering I can think of at least one airline that is entirely European (RyanAir only flies 737s IIRC) that doesn't fly *any* AI aircraft, this sounds like ******** . Being there doesn't come with cites. Sorry. Even the National carriers of France and the UK (especially France), the primary forces behind AI, have dozens of Boeings - why would they bother if there was some deep conspiracy? FAA understands clearly that if they ground any of the busses, that the EU states involved with Airbus will ground Boeings. Don't talk rubbish. What would be the grounds? Revenge. -- Ron |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
THOMAS MOORER, EX-JOINT CHIEFS CHAIR DIES | Ewe n0 who | Military Aviation | 2 | February 12th 04 12:52 AM |
Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements | me | Military Aviation | 146 | January 15th 04 10:13 PM |
FAA Investigates American Flyers | SFM | Instrument Flight Rules | 57 | November 7th 03 09:33 PM |
Airbus Aiming at U.S. Military Market | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 21st 03 08:55 PM |