![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 15:06 27 May 2013, son_of_flubber wrote:
On Monday, May 27, 2013 10:37:32 AM UTC-4, Bill D wrote: On Monday, May 27, 2013 8:23:07 AM UTC-6, John Galloway wrote: Surely this device should be a complete non-starter in a glider cockpit as it give a fixed blind spot in the right lateral visual field. Nope, It's a "see-through" display. The solid bar that supports the 'see through display' blocks some peripheral vision. I don't think that this will stop everyone from using it because some people already fly with big vision blocking hat brims. A hat brim would probably help keep the screen from "washing out" in direct sunlight. Unlike a hat brim the obstruction from the support bar is directly at pupil level and the closeness to the eye means that even a narrow obstruction will subtend an angle large enough to cause a significant lateral blind spot. Most gliders on a collision course are most likely to be level with oneself. This is a crazy idea and to allow pilots to use it would be similar to allowing flying with visual field defects. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, May 27, 2013 12:10:54 PM UTC-4, John Galloway wrote:
Unlike a hat brim the obstruction from the support bar is directly at pupil level and the closeness to the eye means that even a narrow obstruction will subtend an angle large enough to cause a significant lateral blind spot. Most gliders on a collision course are most likely to be level with oneself. Excellent point. This is a crazy idea and to allow pilots to use it would be similar to allowing flying with visual field defects. M |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, May 27, 2013 12:25:59 PM UTC-4, son_of_flubber wrote:
On Monday, May 27, 2013 12:10:54 PM UTC-4, John Galloway wrote: This is a crazy idea and to allow pilots to use it would be similar to allowing flying with visual field defects. My point is that it is hard to stop pilots from doing stupid things, like wearing an excessive hat brim (or wearing Google glass). |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
....And just think - with the optimum soaring path now displayed to the
pilot, you can guarantee yourself a World Championship, simply by buying the best sailplane. Who needs talent any more when you have the money? I think I'll apply for a government grant! "son_of_flubber" wrote in message ... Checklists would also be interesting. Imagine: Glass: Checklist landing * Wind? Check * Approach Speed? Check * Clear Runway? Check I would use a smart phone app today that allowed me to customize a set of checklists and interact with them through voice and synthesized speech. This would be a win because it could eliminate visually distracting checklists. I know that a lot of pilots follow checklists "from memory" but many feel that a checklist should be "written down" to compensate for memory errors. An app like this would increase my use of checklists when my hands and eyes were busy. I'd like to see an AI co-pilot that would have awareness of flight parameters, be able to do simple rule based reasoning and pattern recognition, and give verbal suggestions to the pilot. Kinda like having a CFI in the backseat. For example an AI co-pilot might be able to recognize wind shear, detect that the glider was in the pattern, and give the pilot a heads up "Possible Wind Shear". It would be interesting to have a AI watch my flying, detect that I was having a bad day and flying poorly and tell me to land ASAP. I think I would keep my Google Glass display to a minimum and display only airspeed, altitude, vario and perhaps pattern arrival altitude. AI co-pilot would have some override privilege, so that if I were approaching stall speed it would display only airspeed, large and in red. I'd like the App to let the user customize the AI rules so that the AI would behave to the taste and experience of the pilot. I'd rather see these parameters projected on the canopy, the Google Glass blocks part of my vision of one eye and that is a drawback. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 16:30 27 May 2013, son_of_flubber wrote:
On Monday, May 27, 2013 12:25:59 PM UTC-4, son_of_flubber wrote: On Monday, May 27, 2013 12:10:54 PM UTC-4, John Galloway wrote: This is a crazy idea and to allow pilots to use it would be similar to allowing flying with visual field defects. My point is that it is hard to stop pilots from doing stupid things, like wearing an excessive hat brim (or wearing Google glass). Peer pressure means that you never see glider pilots wearing baseball caps in the UK for exactly this reason. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, May 26, 2013 2:26:10 PM UTC-5, son_of_flubber wrote:
This is funny, but it gives a good idea of the Google Glass point of view. http://mashable.com/2013/05/25/googl...-photographer/ Will we all want to be wearing these in the cockpit three years from now? Not shown is the ability to interact through voice commands and receive information via a synthetic voice. That seems to have potential above the sunlight readable display angle. Anyone working on an XCSoar port to Google Glass? Wrong platform. It will be these. http://www.reconinstruments.com/ |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unlike a hat brim the obstruction from the support bar is directly
at pupil level and the closeness to the eye means that even a narrow obstruction will subtend an angle large enough to cause a significant lateral blind spot. Most gliders on a collision course are most likely to be level with oneself. This is a crazy idea and to allow pilots to use it would be similar to allowing flying with visual field defects. I have not played with Google Glass and I understand the mount may restrict vision. However, AH-64 and F-35 pilot fly with helmet mounted HUDs, so there must be some way to mount this technology that doesn't restrict vision. Also, There are airline pilots in the US with 1st class medicals who only have vision in 1 eye. http://www.aopa.org/careerpilot/arti...dvisor&id=6343 "There are many cases involving loss of vision in one eye. Unilateral vision or visual field defects are waiverable for pilots, but typically not for controllers. Over 200 airmen with first class medical certificates and over 2,000 airmen overall hold a statement of demonstrated ability (SODA) for effective vision in only one eye. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 11:35:17 AM UTC-4, Glenn Fisher wrote:
Also, There are airline pilots in the US with 1st class medicals who only have vision in 1 eye. I know that many airline/military pilots also fly gliders. On a clear day, how does airline/military pilots use of "see and avoid" compare to glider pilots? Are there any "single vision" glider pilots out there? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
son_of_flubber wrote, On 5/28/2013 9:15 AM:
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 11:35:17 AM UTC-4, Glenn Fisher wrote: Also, There are airline pilots in the US with 1st class medicals who only have vision in 1 eye. I know that many airline/military pilots also fly gliders. On a clear day, how does airline/military pilots use of "see and avoid" compare to glider pilots? Are there any "single vision" glider pilots out there? I know two of them. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "Transponders in Sailplanes - Feb/2010" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarm http://tinyurl.com/yb3xywl |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 01:57 29 May 2013, Eric Greenwell wrote:
son_of_flubber wrote, On 5/28/2013 9:15 AM: On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 11:35:17 AM UTC-4, Glenn Fisher wrote: Also, There are airline pilots in the US with 1st class medicals who only have vision in 1 eye. I know that many airline/military pilots also fly gliders. On a clear day, how does airline/military pilots use of "see and avoid" compare to glider pilots? Are there any "single vision" glider pilots out there? I know two of them. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "Transponders in Sailplanes - Feb/2010" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarm http://tinyurl.com/yb3xywl A monocular pilot's visual field towards the bad side is wider than you might think - try it - and he will have adapted in daily life to paying attention to the affected side. Hopefully he will also have adapted his scanning technique. I know an effectively monocular glider pilot and and was happy to share the sky with him for many years until he moved to another part of the UK. A pilot who is used to binocular vision but flying with a close and out of focus lateral blind spot that extends well round towards the central visual would be a menace IMHO. John Galloway |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Google Glass news of interest to pilots and soaring app developers | son_of_flubber | Soaring | 14 | February 23rd 13 05:41 AM |
Glass Cockpit Architecture | Douglas Eagleson | Home Built | 0 | September 14th 10 06:14 PM |
Glass cockpit hard to read | Arno | Piloting | 83 | October 9th 07 06:41 AM |
Why Not Use PC To Make Glass Cockpit? | Le Chaud Lapin | Instrument Flight Rules | 52 | July 19th 05 03:45 AM |
Glass Cockpit in Older Planes | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 2 | May 20th 04 01:20 AM |