A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Bush AWOL Story - New theory comes to light



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 28th 04, 04:16 AM
David Hartung
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Buzzer" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 17:03:16 -0600, Alan Minyard
wrote:

"A second previously unreleased document obtained by the newspaper, a
declassified Air Force Inspector General's report on the Washington
case, states that human reliability rules applied to all Air National
Guard units in the 1970s."

Another lie?


You really have no idea what the PRP programs are about, do you?


I only spent about ten years under HRP for some reason at various
times from 1963 to 1982.


Then you are aware that HRP certification was not necessary unless you were
in a job which put you in close proximity of specific weapon types, and it
is not known if President Bush's unit was tasked with these weapons.


  #2  
Old March 28th 04, 06:11 AM
Buzzer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 03:16:48 GMT, "David Hartung"
wrote:


"Buzzer" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 17:03:16 -0600, Alan Minyard
wrote:

"A second previously unreleased document obtained by the newspaper, a
declassified Air Force Inspector General's report on the Washington
case, states that human reliability rules applied to all Air National
Guard units in the 1970s."

Another lie?

You really have no idea what the PRP programs are about, do you?


I only spent about ten years under HRP for some reason at various
times from 1963 to 1982.


Then you are aware that HRP certification was not necessary unless you were
in a job which put you in close proximity of specific weapon types, and it
is not known if President Bush's unit was tasked with these weapons.


Well I am aware you seem to have left out my last paragraph.

It might have been some policy thought up by a 2lt behind a desk
somewhere in a secret location to have some members of the National
Guard pre-qualified for HRP. Just in case of a national emergency
where they might come in contact with certain weapons. Even though the
base they were presently at did not have those weapons. And even
though said weapons might have been locked away and forgotten by that
time according to sources on the internet.

  #3  
Old March 28th 04, 01:19 PM
BUFDRVR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

to have some members of the National
Guard pre-qualified for HRP.


???? If HRP was like PRP, either you're on it or you're not. I'm not sure what
an HRP "pre-qualification" would look like? What responsibilities would you
have? Would you be able to see a physician besides a USAF Flight Surgeon? How
about going to a magic show and getting hypnotized?


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"
  #5  
Old March 28th 04, 10:58 PM
BUFDRVR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

HRP/PRP pre-qual would be just like you are in it.

This is extremely difficult for traditional reservists and guardsman. PRP means
you can only be seen by an Air Force Flight Surgeon or, in the case of
emergency, seen as soon as possible following care from a non USAF Flight
Surgeon. Most traditional reservist and guardsmen do not live around USAF bases
and are not seen by *any* military physians let alone USAF Flight Surgeons.
Then there is the monitoring aspect of PRP. According to the program, you are
to be monitored by your commander as well as by your peers. How is your
commander to know if you have been under any unusual stress that should
preclude you from working around nuclear weapons if he only sees you one
weekend a month? The answer is, he can't. I'm not sure how these guard units
operated in the 60's and 70's, but today very few (if any) non-active duty
personnel are PRP certified. The B-52 Reserve Squadron has no nuclear mission
simply because of the PRP issue and this includes their ART guys.


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"
  #6  
Old March 29th 04, 02:12 AM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"BUFDRVR" wrote in message
...
HRP/PRP pre-qual would be just like you are in it.


This is extremely difficult for traditional reservists and guardsman. PRP

means
you can only be seen by an Air Force Flight Surgeon or, in the case of
emergency, seen as soon as possible following care from a non USAF Flight
Surgeon. Most traditional reservist and guardsmen do not live around USAF

bases
and are not seen by *any* military physians let alone USAF Flight

Surgeons.
Then there is the monitoring aspect of PRP. According to the program, you

are
to be monitored by your commander as well as by your peers. How is your
commander to know if you have been under any unusual stress that should
preclude you from working around nuclear weapons if he only sees you one
weekend a month? The answer is, he can't. I'm not sure how these guard

units
operated in the 60's and 70's, but today very few (if any) non-active duty
personnel are PRP certified. The B-52 Reserve Squadron has no nuclear

mission
simply because of the PRP issue and this includes their ART guys.


There are no nuclear capable Guard/Reserve units any longer (OK, the F-16's
and F/A-18's in the reserve components still are "nuclear capable", I
imagine, but not so tasked), so your assessment that PRP no longer applies
to the Guard is probably correct; AFAIK, the last such nuclear capable (and
tasked) units would likely have been maybe some of the corps-level artillery
outfits equipped with 155mm and 8 inch guns back in the days before the
1990-92 retirement of the Army's tactical nuclear rounds. But you bring up
an interesting question, as there 8were* nuclear armed Guard units around
not all that long ago--ANG F-101/106 interceptor units armed with AIR-2
Genie, and ARNG Nike Hercules units. The PRP program had to be handled
differently for those units, I'd think; knew a lot of guys who served in the
latter, and never heard of any overly taxing PRP requirements.

Brooks



BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it

harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"



  #7  
Old March 29th 04, 11:33 PM
BUFDRVR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

knew a lot of guys who served in the
latter, and never heard of any overly taxing PRP requirements.


Like I said, I'm not sure how they did it years ago, what I do know is the
challenge in maintaining PRP certified Guard or Reservists (traditional) must
now be considered too complicated...at least that's what the BUFF reserve guys
have told me....


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN ChuckSlusarczyk Home Built 105 October 8th 04 12:38 AM
Bush's guard record JDKAHN Home Built 13 October 3rd 04 09:38 PM
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 04:26 PM
Bu$h Jr's Iran-Contra -- The Pentagone's Reign of Terror PirateJohn Military Aviation 1 September 6th 03 10:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.