![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"monkey" wrote in message om... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "monkey" wrote in message m... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "monkey" wrote in message om... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Steve" wrote in message ... On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 02:44:04 -0600, "Boomer" wrote: yes Flankers have a switch which over rides the FBW limits, that's the only way they can do the "Cobra" manuever. Or you can simply apply an extra 33lb of stick force. That is a lot, the F/A-18 breaks out at 20 lbs. Not true - you are confusing this with aoa feedback in the stick above 20 alpha -to get more g than the programmed limiter (usually 7.5) you must engage the paddle switch, which will then give you 33% more g. I am refering to the force required to move the stick. My F-18 (AV6) had a swich on the left panel to cut out the FCS much like the MiG. move the stick for what? The stick moves to operate the cable actuated system control system. Do you know the airplane at all, monkey sock? I'm actually talking about CAS - the only FCS configuration you would EVER fight the Hornet in - not DEL or MECH modes. I take it you never flew the airplane. you know what- I' don't need to justify what I've done to some wannabe clown- if you've flown it you would know that all the DEL modes (analog, digital, etc)and MECH are backup modes only for when the CAS system fails. Besides, I'm on this board for entertainment purposes only - the one I read for real professional discussion, you can't get on unless you can prove you're a military pilot. I noticed you're not on it Tarver. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "monkey" wrote in message om... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "monkey" wrote in message om... The stick moves to operate the cable actuated system control system. Do you know the airplane at all, monkey sock? I'm actually talking about CAS - the only FCS configuration you would EVER fight the Hornet in - not DEL or MECH modes. I take it you never flew the airplane. you know what- I' don't need to justify what I've done to some wannabe clown- if you've flown it you would know that all the DEL modes (analog, digital, etc)and MECH are backup modes only for when the CAS system fails. Or when CAS is switched out. Which is the way an F-18 can do a cobra like a Flanker. Besides, I'm on this board for entertainment purposes only - the one I read for real professional discussion, you can't get on unless you can prove you're a military pilot. I noticed you're not on it Tarver. I did however design the HARV simulator at NASA and I am well aware of how an F/A-18 works. (first accurate F/A-18 simulator) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"monkey" wrote in message om... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "monkey" wrote in message om... The stick moves to operate the cable actuated system control system. Do you know the airplane at all, monkey sock? I'm actually talking about CAS - the only FCS configuration you would EVER fight the Hornet in - not DEL or MECH modes. I take it you never flew the airplane. you know what- I' don't need to justify what I've done to some wannabe clown- if you've flown it you would know that all the DEL modes (analog, digital, etc)and MECH are backup modes only for when the CAS system fails. Or when CAS is switched out. Which is the way an F-18 can do a cobra like a Flanker. Besides, I'm on this board for entertainment purposes only - the one I read for real professional discussion, you can't get on unless you can prove you're a military pilot. I noticed you're not on it Tarver. I did however design the HARV simulator at NASA and I am well aware of how an F/A-18 works. (first accurate F/A-18 simulator) OK, now I see where you are coming from - academically. It's taken awhile for me to see your viewpoint. Operationally, one never uses any mode except for CAS - there's no need to unless it craps out or you get battle damage resulting in it. Referring to the checklist, DEL ON, MECH ON, FCS CAUT, AIL OFF, FC AIR DAT, FCS HOT, FLAPS OFF, FLAP SCHED, R LIM OFF, RUD OFF are all considered EMERGENCY situations and are dealt with as such. I guess the test pilot dudes might play around with that sort of stuff, but never the line guys. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "monkey" wrote in message om... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "monkey" wrote in message om... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "monkey" wrote in message om... The stick moves to operate the cable actuated system control system. Do you know the airplane at all, monkey sock? I'm actually talking about CAS - the only FCS configuration you would EVER fight the Hornet in - not DEL or MECH modes. I take it you never flew the airplane. you know what- I' don't need to justify what I've done to some wannabe clown- if you've flown it you would know that all the DEL modes (analog, digital, etc)and MECH are backup modes only for when the CAS system fails. Or when CAS is switched out. Which is the way an F-18 can do a cobra like a Flanker. Besides, I'm on this board for entertainment purposes only - the one I read for real professional discussion, you can't get on unless you can prove you're a military pilot. I noticed you're not on it Tarver. I did however design the HARV simulator at NASA and I am well aware of how an F/A-18 works. (first accurate F/A-18 simulator) OK, now I see where you are coming from - academically. It's taken awhile for me to see your viewpoint. Operationally, one never uses any mode except for CAS - there's no need to unless it craps out or you get battle damage resulting in it. Referring to the checklist, DEL ON, MECH ON, FCS CAUT, AIL OFF, FC AIR DAT, FCS HOT, FLAPS OFF, FLAP SCHED, R LIM OFF, RUD OFF are all considered EMERGENCY situations and are dealt with as such. I guess the test pilot dudes might play around with that sort of stuff, but never the line guys. The line guys need to know the emergency procedure of breaking the stick out in order to be safe. The fact that you are still disputing that seems odd to me. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"monkey" wrote in message om... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "monkey" wrote in message om... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "monkey" wrote in message om... The stick moves to operate the cable actuated system control system. Do you know the airplane at all, monkey sock? I'm actually talking about CAS - the only FCS configuration you would EVER fight the Hornet in - not DEL or MECH modes. I take it you never flew the airplane. you know what- I' don't need to justify what I've done to some wannabe clown- if you've flown it you would know that all the DEL modes (analog, digital, etc)and MECH are backup modes only for when the CAS system fails. Or when CAS is switched out. Which is the way an F-18 can do a cobra like a Flanker. Besides, I'm on this board for entertainment purposes only - the one I read for real professional discussion, you can't get on unless you can prove you're a military pilot. I noticed you're not on it Tarver. I did however design the HARV simulator at NASA and I am well aware of how an F/A-18 works. (first accurate F/A-18 simulator) OK, now I see where you are coming from - academically. It's taken awhile for me to see your viewpoint. Operationally, one never uses any mode except for CAS - there's no need to unless it craps out or you get battle damage resulting in it. Referring to the checklist, DEL ON, MECH ON, FCS CAUT, AIL OFF, FC AIR DAT, FCS HOT, FLAPS OFF, FLAP SCHED, R LIM OFF, RUD OFF are all considered EMERGENCY situations and are dealt with as such. I guess the test pilot dudes might play around with that sort of stuff, but never the line guys. The line guys need to know the emergency procedure of breaking the stick out in order to be safe. The fact that you are still disputing that seems odd to me. NO. In my air force we have been flying the Hornet for over 20 years. I can't speak for the USN guys, but our jet does not even have a switch to turn off CAS - except for FCE 1, 2, 3, 4, CBs. When you talk about the switch on the "left" there is FCS reset or GAIN ORIDE, which just controls LEF and TEF. I also took a look in more detail at the PCL and there is NO emergency in which the system would be disable by the pilot - it automatically reverts. I'm also not sure about the USN jet but ours is pretty much alpha unlimited in normal operation. If you're talking about the g limiter/paddle switch I understand- but i think you are confusing test bed features with production aircraft. I'll tell you what, we have a Marine exchange O on our sqn, I will talk to him tomorrow about their EPs. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "monkey" wrote in message om... NO. In my air force we have been flying the Hornet for over 20 years. I can't speak for the USN guys, but our jet does not even have a switch to turn off CAS - except for FCE 1, 2, 3, 4, CBs. That does not mean that CAS can never fail and that alone causes your training to be unsafe for that case. Unless of course you mean that you do not fly the hornet and never have. Much like a Turkish 757 pilot with static port problems thinking the pitot static system is based on pitot tubes and the airspeed can't be doing what it is; right into the drink. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"monkey" wrote in message om... NO. In my air force we have been flying the Hornet for over 20 years. I can't speak for the USN guys, but our jet does not even have a switch to turn off CAS - except for FCE 1, 2, 3, 4, CBs. That does not mean that CAS can never fail and that alone causes your training to be unsafe for that case. Unless of course you mean that you do not fly the hornet and never have. Much like a Turkish 757 pilot with static port problems thinking the pitot static system is based on pitot tubes and the airspeed can't be doing what it is; right into the drink. you know what dude, I'm tired of you and your pigheaded opinions - I don't see why you have this need to continually act like an ass and try to condescend people - I have absolutely NO need to justify myself to you - I notice that you make a lot of posts, so I guess your "job" doesn't keep you busy enough. The only reason I can think for your argumentative nature is this forum helps you out with your "small rocket' syndrome - see ya, clown. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OT-ish Su27 Flanker fans *might* enjoy... | Andrew MacPherson | Military Aviation | 0 | February 1st 04 11:33 AM |
F-22 Comparison | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 39 | December 4th 03 04:25 PM |
[New WebSite] Su-27 Flanker | Benoit | Military Aviation | 0 | November 11th 03 04:54 PM |
Su-27SK(Upgraded), Su-27KUB & new Flanker book | Thomas J. Paladino Jr. | Military Aviation | 6 | July 28th 03 07:53 PM |
RIAT Fairford Reviews | John Cook | Military Aviation | 4 | July 21st 03 07:36 PM |