X-43A successful flight

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"Michael Zaharis" wrote in message
...


Tarver Engineering wrote:
It is a new B-52, so you didn't see what you thought.

Wrong. It was one of the older B-52s. Note the tall tale, indicating
that it is not the new H- model that NASA recently converted.

http://www.cnn.com/interactive/space...al.02.nasa.jpg

You are correct. My friends at Dryden had assured me that the H would be
flying the payload and I am wrong.


Liar, you dont have any friends.

BTW congrats on your first ever known admission of an error. or is
this a forged post ?

(running with scissors)
Date: 3/31/2004 2:10 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...
"Michael Zaharis" wrote in message
...


Tarver Engineering wrote:
It is a new B-52, so you didn't see what you thought.

Wrong. It was one of the older B-52s. Note the tall tale, indicating
that it is not the new H- model that NASA recently converted.

http://www.cnn.com/interactive/space...al.02.nasa.jpg

You are correct. My friends at Dryden had assured me that the H would be
flying the payload and I am wrong.


Liar, you dont have any friends.

BTW congrats on your first ever known admission of an error. or is
this a forged post ?

It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never wrong and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never wrong and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions admitted to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or ADMITS a
mistake or is it misteak?

Rick
MFE

"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or ADMITS a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive troll, until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.

From: "Tarver Engineering"

"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or ADMITS a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive troll, until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.


Tarver, someday you will have to explain to us what "Knoyle's archive troll"
means. Everything I ever cited as coming from you came from a Google search,
not Knoyle's or any of the other sites dedicated to you.

There are similar sites dedicated to you in several forums from hot air
balooning to cars to homebuilt aircraft to this one. You have made such a fool
of yourself in all those forums that people collect the "tarverisms" into
sites. They are not all made by Knoyle or any other individual.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"

"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never
wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions
admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or ADMITS
a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive troll,
until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.


Tarver, someday you will have to explain to us what "Knoyle's archive
troll"
means. Everything I ever cited as coming from you came from a Google
search,
not Knoyle's or any of the other sites dedicated to you.

Right.

There are similar sites dedicated to you in several forums from hot air
balooning to cars to homebuilt aircraft to this one. You have made such a
fool
of yourself in all those forums that people collect the "tarverisms" into
sites. They are not all made by Knoyle or any other individual.

I made up the term Tarverism.

Be a man Dan and post up that apology.

From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 3/31/2004 8:19 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"

"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never
wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions
admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or ADMITS
a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive troll,
until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.


Tarver, someday you will have to explain to us what "Knoyle's archive
troll"
means. Everything I ever cited as coming from you came from a Google
search,
not Knoyle's or any of the other sites dedicated to you.

Right.

There are similar sites dedicated to you in several forums from hot air
balooning to cars to homebuilt aircraft to this one. You have made such a
fool
of yourself in all those forums that people collect the "tarverisms" into
sites. They are not all made by Knoyle or any other individual.

I made up the term Tarverism.

Be a man Dan and post up that apology.

Apologize for what? Not stooping to your level by being vulgar and making
personal attacks? For not using Knoyle's archives to remind you of some of the
incredibly strange assertions you have made? For disagreeing with you on
systems I have worked and you haven't? For not getting angry when you
repeatedly claimed I had been thrown out of the Air Force with a dishonourable?
For proving you wrong with facts from reliable sources? For asking you to cite
independant and reliable sources? For not believing you are correct when
reliable and independant expert sources have proved you wrong?

Just what am I supposed to apologize for?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"

"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never
wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions
admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or ADMITS
a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive troll,
until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.


Tarver, someday you will have to explain to us what "Knoyle's archive
troll"
means. Everything I ever cited as coming from you came from a Google
search,
not Knoyle's or any of the other sites dedicated to you.

Right.

There are similar sites dedicated to you in several forums from hot air
balooning to cars to homebuilt aircraft to this one. You have made such a
fool
of yourself in all those forums that people collect the "tarverisms" into
sites. They are not all made by Knoyle or any other individual.

I made up the term Tarverism.

no you didnt.

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or ADMITS a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive troll, until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.

so you still satnd by the following quotes you made:

"Hitler believed the homosexual was already suicidal and just needed a little
push to be a true NAZI achiever. Homosexuals had great power in NAZI
Germany."

or

"That is the case with all modern transports Gord. Pitot tubes are only used
for flight test back up instrumentation for modern transports; pitot tubes
have a nasty habbit of atracting mud bees and are therefore not reliable
enough for revenue these past few decades."

or

"The pitot tube was added to the first American jets to prevent the kind of
failures that killed an entire squadron off Florida. Without P1 and T0 a
jet will stall in fog."

quotes, courtesy of John P. Tarver, MS/PE