Help needed at Mifflin.

http://dailycaller.com/2013/07/23/st...wind-turbines/

Convenient how the liberally controlled federal governments "errors" always seem to go in favor of what they are pushing (global warming, climate change, etc) until their research gets called out as bull****. Then it gets corrected, reluctantly. Here is another great example.

http://news.heartland.org/newspaper-...ats-every-year

http://trib.com/business/energy/fed-...b3ea3670b.html

....and my personal favorite...WIND ENERGY GETS AWAY WITH MURDER! http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamescon...y-with-murder/

And the same for global cooling (sorry, I meant warming...), wait a minute............ 15 years of cooling? How is that even possible? WTH?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/env...cientists.html

Sean F (F2) wrote, On 10/10/2013 9:28 AM:
And the same for global cooling (sorry, I meant warming...), wait a
minute............ 15 years of cooling? How is that even possible?
WTH?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/env...climatechange/...

Please, PLEASE DON'T START THESE POLITICALLY CHARGED ARGUMENTS
ON RAS!

There are literally thousands of internet sites to discuss global
warming and climate change, places where everyone there WANTS to discuss
it, unlike here at RAS, where discussing soaring is what everyone wants.

So, please, anyone that wants to respond to Sean's post
(for/against/whatever), please do it privately and not on RAS.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to
email me)

On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 09:28:36 -0700, Sean F (F2) wrote:

And the same for global cooling (sorry, I meant warming...), wait a
minute............ 15 years of cooling? How is that even possible?
WTH?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/env...ange/10294082/
Global-warming-No-actually-were-cooling-claim-scientists.html

Hey, there is a good reason why the Telegraph is known as the Torygraph
in these parts. To put that in perspective: our Tories have a lot in
common with your Tea Party.


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |

Sean F (F2) wrote, On 10/10/2013 9:25 AM:
http://dailycaller.com/2013/07/23/st...underestimated....
Convenient how the liberally controlled federal governments "errors"
always seem to go in favor of what they are pushing (global warming,
climate change, etc) until their research gets called out as
bull****. Then it gets corrected, reluctantly. Here is another
great example.

http://news.heartland.org/newspaper-...2013/07/24/us-...
http://trib.com/business/energy/fed-...duce-bird-kill...

...and my personal favorite...WIND ENERGY GETS AWAY WITH MURDER!
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamescon.../wind-energy-g...

I really hope we will all stay focused on Karl's concern. Dividing us up
into various political groups and arguing about which energy source is
best will not help soaring at Mifflin.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to
email me)

On 10/10/2013 4:00 PM, Eric Greenwell wrote:
arguing about which energy source is best will not help soaring at Mifflin


As glider pilots, I think we can all agree that the best energy source
is the SUN

Cheers,
Luke Szczepaniak