X-43A successful flight

Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never wrong and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions admitted to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or ADMITS a
mistake or is it misteak?

Rick
MFE

"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or ADMITS a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive troll, until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.

From: "Tarver Engineering"

"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or ADMITS a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive troll, until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.


Tarver, someday you will have to explain to us what "Knoyle's archive troll"
means. Everything I ever cited as coming from you came from a Google search,
not Knoyle's or any of the other sites dedicated to you.

There are similar sites dedicated to you in several forums from hot air
balooning to cars to homebuilt aircraft to this one. You have made such a fool
of yourself in all those forums that people collect the "tarverisms" into
sites. They are not all made by Knoyle or any other individual.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"

"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never
wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions
admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or ADMITS
a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive troll,
until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.


Tarver, someday you will have to explain to us what "Knoyle's archive
troll"
means. Everything I ever cited as coming from you came from a Google
search,
not Knoyle's or any of the other sites dedicated to you.

Right.

There are similar sites dedicated to you in several forums from hot air
balooning to cars to homebuilt aircraft to this one. You have made such a
fool
of yourself in all those forums that people collect the "tarverisms" into
sites. They are not all made by Knoyle or any other individual.

I made up the term Tarverism.

Be a man Dan and post up that apology.

From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 3/31/2004 8:19 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"

"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never
wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions
admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or ADMITS
a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive troll,
until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.


Tarver, someday you will have to explain to us what "Knoyle's archive
troll"
means. Everything I ever cited as coming from you came from a Google
search,
not Knoyle's or any of the other sites dedicated to you.

Right.

There are similar sites dedicated to you in several forums from hot air
balooning to cars to homebuilt aircraft to this one. You have made such a
fool
of yourself in all those forums that people collect the "tarverisms" into
sites. They are not all made by Knoyle or any other individual.

I made up the term Tarverism.

Be a man Dan and post up that apology.

Apologize for what? Not stooping to your level by being vulgar and making
personal attacks? For not using Knoyle's archives to remind you of some of the
incredibly strange assertions you have made? For disagreeing with you on
systems I have worked and you haven't? For not getting angry when you
repeatedly claimed I had been thrown out of the Air Force with a dishonourable?
For proving you wrong with facts from reliable sources? For asking you to cite
independant and reliable sources? For not believing you are correct when
reliable and independant expert sources have proved you wrong?

Just what am I supposed to apologize for?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 3/31/2004 8:19 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"

"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never
wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions
admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or
ADMITS
a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive troll,
until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.


Tarver, someday you will have to explain to us what "Knoyle's archive
troll"
means. Everything I ever cited as coming from you came from a Google
search,
not Knoyle's or any of the other sites dedicated to you.

Right.

There are similar sites dedicated to you in several forums from hot air
balooning to cars to homebuilt aircraft to this one. You have made such
a
fool
of yourself in all those forums that people collect the "tarverisms"
into
sites. They are not all made by Knoyle or any other individual.

I made up the term Tarverism.

Be a man Dan and post up that apology.

Apologize for what?

You owe me an apology for you being a clueless ass you several years WRT
pitot static systems, Dan.

From: "Tarver Engineering"


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 3/31/2004 8:19 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"

"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never
wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions
admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or
ADMITS
a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive troll,
until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.


Tarver, someday you will have to explain to us what "Knoyle's archive
troll"
means. Everything I ever cited as coming from you came from a Google
search,
not Knoyle's or any of the other sites dedicated to you.

Right.

There are similar sites dedicated to you in several forums from hot air
balooning to cars to homebuilt aircraft to this one. You have made such
a
fool
of yourself in all those forums that people collect the "tarverisms"
into
sites. They are not all made by Knoyle or any other individual.

I made up the term Tarverism.

Be a man Dan and post up that apology.

Apologize for what?

You owe me an apology for you being a clueless ass you several years WRT
pitot static systems, Dan.

Unlike you I have 20 years experience in pitot-static systems. Do a google
search on your converstations with several of us and you will see I have
nothing to apologize for.

I notice you deleted:

begin quote

Apologize for what? Not stooping to your level by being vulgar and making
personal attacks? For not using Knoyle's archives to remind you of some of the
incredibly strange assertions you have made? For disagreeing with you on
systems I have worked and you haven't? For not getting angry when you
repeatedly claimed I had been thrown out of the Air Force with a dishonourable?
For proving you wrong with facts from reliable sources? For asking you to cite
independant and reliable sources? For not believing you are correct when
reliable and independant expert sources have proved you wrong?

Just what am I supposed to apologize for?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

end quote


Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 3/31/2004 8:19 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"

"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never
wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions
admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or
ADMITS
a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive troll,
until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.


Tarver, someday you will have to explain to us what "Knoyle's archive
troll"
means. Everything I ever cited as coming from you came from a Google
search,
not Knoyle's or any of the other sites dedicated to you.

Right.

There are similar sites dedicated to you in several forums from hot air
balooning to cars to homebuilt aircraft to this one. You have made such
a
fool
of yourself in all those forums that people collect the "tarverisms"
into
sites. They are not all made by Knoyle or any other individual.

I made up the term Tarverism.

Be a man Dan and post up that apology.

Apologize for what?

You owe me an apology for you being a clueless ass you several years WRT
pitot static systems, Dan.

then splaps boy, by similarity you should not only be apologizing to
humanity, but flagellating yourself with stinging nettles.

(B2431) wrote in message ...
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 3/31/2004 8:19 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"

"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never
wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions
admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or ADMITS
a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive troll,
until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.


Tarver, someday you will have to explain to us what "Knoyle's archive
troll"
means. Everything I ever cited as coming from you came from a Google
search,
not Knoyle's or any of the other sites dedicated to you.

Right.

There are similar sites dedicated to you in several forums from hot air
balooning to cars to homebuilt aircraft to this one. You have made such a
fool
of yourself in all those forums that people collect the "tarverisms" into
sites. They are not all made by Knoyle or any other individual.

I made up the term Tarverism.

Be a man Dan and post up that apology.

Apologize for what? Not stooping to your level by being vulgar and making
personal attacks? For not using Knoyle's archives to remind you of some of the
incredibly strange assertions you have made? For disagreeing with you on
systems I have worked and you haven't? For not getting angry when you
repeatedly claimed I had been thrown out of the Air Force with a dishonourable?
For proving you wrong with facts from reliable sources? For asking you to cite
independant and reliable sources? For not believing you are correct when
reliable and independant expert sources have proved you wrong?

Just what am I supposed to apologize for?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

thats about the size of it, remember without Tarver the wright
brothers would never have got off the ground. Boeing, Honeywell,
Collins the NTSB
the wright brothers, Antonov Design Bureau and NASA all couldnt exist
without Tarver and quotes like the following show his true capacity in
aviation:

...."Retarding the throttles will cease the engines from adding thrust,
my silly rodent. Reducing pilot workload gives the Operator more time
to deploy Spoiler Flaps into a Speed Brake configuration"

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"

"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote:
It has to be a fake. Tarver is a legend in his own mind, is never
wrong
and
will NEVER say he is. Just ask him.

I think you are wrong this time Dan, Tarver has on rare occasions
admitted
to
mis-speaking as opposed to another individual who NEVER makes or ADMITS
a
mistake or is it misteak?

Dan made a fool of himself for years peddling Knoyle's archive troll,
until
he saw the paradox of Knoyle's ignorance. Still no apology.


Tarver, someday you will have to explain to us what "Knoyle's archive
troll"
means. Everything I ever cited as coming from you came from a Google
search,
not Knoyle's or any of the other sites dedicated to you.

Right.

There are similar sites dedicated to you in several forums from hot air
balooning to cars to homebuilt aircraft to this one. You have made such a
fool
of yourself in all those forums that people collect the "tarverisms" into
sites. They are not all made by Knoyle or any other individual.

I made up the term Tarverism.

no you didnt.