![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, October 20, 2013 1:07:38 PM UTC-4, Darryl Ramm wrote:
Uh? Why are you talking about "thermal trips" and automatic resetting? Hi Darryl - I think he's talking about PTCs, which are appropriate in some situations but not here... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, October 20, 2013 12:23:18 PM UTC-7, Dave Nadler wrote:
On Sunday, October 20, 2013 1:07:38 PM UTC-4, Darryl Ramm wrote: Uh? Why are you talking about "thermal trips" and automatic resetting? Hi Darryl - I think he's talking about PTCs, which are appropriate in some situations but not here... Hi Dave - yes, hopefully common sense would prevent their use. And automatic resetting breakers are also forbidden by CFR 14 23.1357. But part 23 may not apply to a JAR-22 derived type certificate on a glider but its a good place to get input on ways to do things and what an A&P/DAR/FSDO would like to see. Folks really ought to think Klixon type breakers if using a breaker on gliders. Folks might also want to note the requirement in CFR 14 23.1357 for the fuses to be replaceable in flight if critical and the need to carry spares. So you might be able to argue that some non-critical fuses can be placed behind the panel but others will clearly fail that requirement. I'd not want to argue with the FAA for example that the fuel pump or engine controller fuse holders and replacement fuses in a motorglider don't need to be accessible to the pilot. Also see FAA AC 43.13 Acceptable Methods, Techniques, and Practices - Aircraft Inspection and Repair. Chapter 11 (Electrical Systems). Lots of good stuff there that should be read by anybody who is considering messing around with any aircraft wiring, not all of it applies to gliders however. And as promoted before on r.a.s. there is lots of advice on aircraft wiring on this web site. http://www.aeroelectric.com/articles.html (mostly intended for home builders of power aircraft) --- And... if working on any aircraft start with talking with a local A&P (or maybe an EAA homebuilder or similar), if certified they'll need the A&P will need to sign off on what you do (or do it for you), if experiential you want their advice and likely a look over what you are planning to do/have done. There is a lot to gain by actually having somebody look over your shoulder that you can't get off r.a.s. The most important place for circuit breakers is right at the battery, typically a 5A or 10A breaker mounted on the battery or right next to it that will protect your aircraft/wiring harness from a fire caused by a dead short.. I would use a breaker for that, easy to reset, never missing a replacement fuse etc. and the voltage drop is relatively insignificant for these higher current breakers. That primary circuit protection is in JAR-22 but is unfortunately vague. What you do downsteam for there is more complex, some avionics/device vendors will spec a slow or some cases fast blow fuse to protect delicate devices, some will say a breaker is OK. Read the documentation. Get advice from somebody experienced with this stuff who can look at exactly what you are doing. Note the FAR and JAR requirements for each "critical"/"saftey of flight" device to have its own separate overload protection, and just good common sense as well. Darryl |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, October 20, 2013 at 3:48:31 PM UTC-6, Darryl Ramm wrote:
Folks might also want to note the requirement in CFR 14 23.1357 for the fuses to be replaceable in flight if critical and the need to carry spares. So you might be able to argue that some non-critical fuses can be placed behind the panel but others will clearly fail that requirement. I'd not want to argue with the FAA for example that the fuel pump or engine controller fuse holders and replacement fuses in a motorglider don't need to be accessible to the pilot. For Day VFR there is nothing "Citical". Granted, the FAA has gone back and forth on this over the years but I think this is being a bit overthought. Also see FAA AC 43.13 Acceptable Methods, Techniques, and Practices - And... if working on any aircraft start with talking with a local A&P (or maybe an EAA homebuilder or similar), if certified they'll need the A&P will need to sign off on what you do (or do it for you), if experiential you want their advice and likely a look over what you are planning to do/have done. There is a lot to gain by actually having somebody look over your shoulder that you can't get off r.a.s. AC43 is great but it tends to not address gliders (That do not have engine driven electrical systems). A big example is common grounding VS airframe ground. This can be a tough sell if your A&P is not familiar with gliders. Another biggie is the use of non aviation grade (Or car parts). If your glider was built of certificated in Europe it has a lot of off the shelf componentry. This can also be an issue to some mechanics not familiar with gliders. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, November 1, 2016 at 8:27:11 AM UTC-7, wrote:
On Sunday, October 20, 2013 at 3:48:31 PM UTC-6, Darryl Ramm wrote: Folks might also want to note the requirement in CFR 14 23.1357 for the fuses to be replaceable in flight if critical and the need to carry spares.. So you might be able to argue that some non-critical fuses can be placed behind the panel but others will clearly fail that requirement. I'd not want to argue with the FAA for example that the fuel pump or engine controller fuse holders and replacement fuses in a motorglider don't need to be accessible to the pilot. For Day VFR there is nothing "Citical". Granted, the FAA has gone back and forth on this over the years but I think this is being a bit overthought. Also see FAA AC 43.13 Acceptable Methods, Techniques, and Practices - And... if working on any aircraft start with talking with a local A&P (or maybe an EAA homebuilder or similar), if certified they'll need the A&P will need to sign off on what you do (or do it for you), if experiential you want their advice and likely a look over what you are planning to do/have done. There is a lot to gain by actually having somebody look over your shoulder that you can't get off r.a.s. AC43 is great but it tends to not address gliders (That do not have engine driven electrical systems). A big example is common grounding VS airframe ground. This can be a tough sell if your A&P is not familiar with gliders. Another biggie is the use of non aviation grade (Or car parts). If your glider was built of certificated in Europe it has a lot of off the shelf componentry. This can also be an issue to some mechanics not familiar with gliders. If your A&P wants to use airframe ground on your composite glider, get yourself a new A&P:-) I use MIL-Spec 3A Klixon breakers on the panel and the Dittel battery box came with its own built in breaker. I only saw about 0.2VDC drop across the Klixon breakers. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fuses in general | Tuno | Soaring | 19 | December 11th 08 06:45 PM |
fuses vs. circuit breakers | raulb | Soaring | 0 | November 8th 07 02:48 PM |
Bussman Fuses | kevmor | Piloting | 10 | May 25th 07 03:25 AM |
Bussman Fuses | kevmor | Piloting | 2 | May 22nd 07 09:28 PM |
Fuses versus Breakers | ContestID67 | Soaring | 14 | March 14th 05 01:47 PM |