![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Perhaps a better movie analogy would be "show me the money!". Your choice in gliders will be dictated by how much you want to spend on one. Once you have a dollar figure in mind, you can narrow down your options.
Craig |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Craig,
I hear you. However, I can pick a budget of $30k and usually pick between a flapped and non-flapped (flapless?) for close to that budget. The same seems true for $50k and $70k. Based on the replies, now I'm trying to understand why anyone bothers to make flapped sailplanes if there is no measurable difference in having them... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 8:53:11 PM UTC-7, wrote:
Based on the replies, now I'm trying to understand why anyone bothers to make flapped sailplanes if there is no measurable difference in having them... In my experience owning various flapped and unflapped gliders, with flaps, you have a better view over the nose and can make a slower approach than is typical of equivalent unflapped gliders. If you always land at airports, it won''t make much difference, but I made my share of mistakes while learning cross-country flying, flaps saved my bacon more than once. I also found it advantageous to crank in full thermal flap (and sometimes more) when climbing full of water in the kind of small tight cores we sometimes need to deal with out here on the west coast. And, if you're cruising at 90+ knots with water, negative flaps do make a noticeable difference. On the other hand, the work load in a flapped glider is noticeably higher than without flaps, for that reason alone I'll probably do without in my next glider... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 10:53:11 PM UTC-5, wrote:
Based on the replies, now I'm trying to understand why anyone bothers to make flapped sailplanes if there is no measurable difference in having them.... Well, when you top out that last thermal with a good final glide home, it sure is nice to push the flaps up and walk away from your buddy in his un-flapped glider... Seriously, there is a small but significant difference in performance with flaps. But it depends a lot on where and how you fly - Eastern US, fun flying, not so much (except on the ridge?). Out West, racing or pushing hard, it can be significant. Same can be said about water - both are a bit addictive when sampled in the right conditions (120+ knot final glides, for example!) For some, the slower landing speed of flapped gliders is appealing. Me, I like having something useful to do with my left hand! Kirk 66 LS6-b |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good feedback.
So, I'll run this by my CFI-G and some more of my club mates. Here is where I am now: Discus 2b ASW-27 a distant third: SZD 55-1 long shot: DG 303 Elan (this is probably a DQ due to A/D spar issue) In my research, it has become clear that the Discus is pretty much the best standard class you can get. For the 15m class I like the ASW for some reason, even though the Ventus 2 seems to win many more championships. I'm open to comments and advice from all, especially if you have flown any of these ships. I'm going to make a buy decision in the next week or so...hopefully. Thanks for the help! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flaps (27, V2) have small but distinct advantages. Thermal slower, see over the nose, very high speed glides, ridge bombing, final approach steeper, land slower, better takeoff control. I think they are abundantly worth the roughly $5-$10k price you pay.
As others pointed out, modern flapped gliders are very easy to fly -- no real extra skill needed. Really, the only reason unflapped gliders exist is because there was an FAI class that said no flaps. Notice "was." The standard class is dying out as a competition class. Though no new standard/15 meter gliders are being made, 15 meter will remain a very competitive essentially one design class for a long time. If you buy standard, get ready to join club class, handicapped regionals, or suffer flap envy in 15 meter. Sure, everyone says the performance is "almost" the same, and winning is up to the pilot, and you're only giving up 20 points a day.. Are you going to be happy with that? If you buy standard, you will be thinking for a long time, "should I move up to flaps?" If you buy 15, that won't be nagging you. Of course, "should I pay another $80k for 18 meters" will start nagging you, but that's easier to ignore. John Cochrane (Pegasus, Discus CS, ASW27) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John,
Thanks for the post. This is really helpful and makes a lot of sense. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 8:52:06 AM UTC-6, wrote:
John, Thanks for the post. This is really helpful and makes a lot of sense. Go for a flapped ship for all of the reasons you have read....You will not regret it! Good luck! Renny (1-26B, Std. Cirrus, Pegasus, 304CZ, Discus 2B, LAK-17B FES) ;-) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In terms of flaps, basically if you're not going to be cruising more than
75 knots (unballasted) most of the time, it doesn't really matter if you're in a standard or flapped ship. Effectively, a standard ship has two "flap" settings built into its airfoil; thermalling and cruising. The cruising part is in the order of 0 to a couple positive degrees of flap, where the smart German engineers figured you will be flying the vast majority of the time. So if you're going to be flying in stronger conditions, above MC 3, you'll notice the difference. Otherwise, they're practically identical. Regards, Daniel Sazhin At 14:05 16 October 2013, wrote: Good feedback. So, I'll run this by my CFI-G and some more of my club mates. Here is where I am now: Discus 2b ASW-27 a distant third: SZD 55-1 long shot: DG 303 Elan (this is probably a DQ due to A/D spar issue) In my research, it has become clear that the Discus is pretty much the best standard class you can get. For the 15m class I like the ASW for some reason, even though the Ventus 2 seems to win many more championships. I'm open to comments and advice from all, especially if you have flown any of these ships. I'm going to make a buy decision in the next week or so...hopefully. Thanks for the help! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cross Country Miles | Bill[_22_] | Soaring | 17 | September 8th 12 02:36 PM |
Cross Country again! | Michelle | Piloting | 10 | August 6th 06 06:45 PM |
Our first IFR cross-country trip: NY-MI-IL-MI-NY | Longworth | Piloting | 16 | July 15th 05 08:12 PM |
Cross country in the 1-34 | mat Redsell | Soaring | 3 | October 22nd 04 04:56 PM |
A 4,200 NM cross-country | Phil Verghese | Piloting | 0 | September 1st 03 10:03 PM |