Some gliders safer than others?

On Thursday, October 24, 2013 12:35:45 PM UTC-4, kirk.stant wrote:
I know of a passenger that broke an ankle in a stalled 2-33 crash that broke the plane in two (behind the wing trailing edge)...

I only have anecdotes wrt survivability of 2-33 crashes, but your anecdote seems pretty favorable. I'd be happy to simply break an ankle and hop away from the front seat of a stalled and crashed glider.

On Thursday, October 24, 2013 5:48:16 PM UTC-4, son_of_flubber wrote:
On Thursday, October 24, 2013 12:35:45 PM UTC-4, kirk.stant wrote:

I know of a passenger that broke an ankle in a stalled 2-33 crash that broke the plane in two (behind the wing trailing edge)...



I only have anecdotes wrt survivability of 2-33 crashes, but your anecdote seems pretty favorable. I'd be happy to simply break an ankle and hop away from the front seat of a stalled and crashed glider.

I was interested by this discussion and looked in the NTSB reports - if I am counting right, in the US, only one person has ever died in the back seat of a 2-33. Six people total have been killed, in five crashes. One of those who died was a suicide - no kidding, he actually left a note. No one has been killed in a 2-33 since 1978.

There have been 226 reported, non-fatal accidents. That makes 231 reported accidents total, with 2.16% being fatal.

on the suicide note subject. did that happen in Washington State?

GK



On Thursday, October 24, 2013 5:51:49 PM UTC-7, James Lee wrote:
On Thursday, October 24, 2013 5:48:16 PM UTC-4, son_of_flubber wrote:

On Thursday, October 24, 2013 12:35:45 PM UTC-4, kirk.stant wrote:



I know of a passenger that broke an ankle in a stalled 2-33 crash that broke the plane in two (behind the wing trailing edge)...







I only have anecdotes wrt survivability of 2-33 crashes, but your anecdote seems pretty favorable. I'd be happy to simply break an ankle and hop away from the front seat of a stalled and crashed glider.



I was interested by this discussion and looked in the NTSB reports - if I am counting right, in the US, only one person has ever died in the back seat of a 2-33. Six people total have been killed, in five crashes. One of those who died was a suicide - no kidding, he actually left a note. No one has been killed in a 2-33 since 1978.



There have been 226 reported, non-fatal accidents. That makes 231 reported accidents total, with 2.16% being fatal.

Brad, it looks like it was at Calistoga in 1975.

Brad,

I believe it was Hailey, Idaho (Sun Valley Soaring). I don't know the
year. I've just heard the stories. It happened before I got involved
in the sport.


On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 18:05:14 -0700 (PDT), Brad
wrote:

on the suicide note subject. did that happen in Washington State?

On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 5:28:20 AM UTC-7, Wayne wrote:
Brad,



I believe it was Hailey, Idaho (Sun Valley Soaring). I don't know the

year. I've just heard the stories. It happened before I got involved

in the sport.





On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 18:05:14 -0700 (PDT), Brad

wrote:



on the suicide note subject. did that happen in Washington State?



thanks for the reply Wayne and Bob. there was a suicide years ago in Wa State by an instructor. not sure about a note tho. he had a 2-33 but used a shotgun.

he was my primary instructor, learned in the 2-33 and always enjoyed it.

Brad

So flying a 2-33 actually drove someone to suicide? I can believe that.

On Thursday, October 24, 2013 4:48:16 PM UTC-5, son_of_flubber wrote:

I only have anecdotes wrt survivability of 2-33 crashes, but your anecdote seems pretty favorable. I'd be happy to simply break an ankle and hop away from the front seat of a stalled and crashed glider.

It wasn't a stall spin, it was a full-stalled hard landing (launched into a dust devil and released early, then full aft stick until impact in the desert - by a commercial pilot giving a ride, no less. Amazingly poor airmanship!).

But without data of other similar events in other types of gliders, all our comments are just opinions. It could be that the 2-33 is the safest method of transportation known to man, but I "personally" doubt it.

I do find it amusing that one of the first defenses raised whenever the 2-33 is discussed is that "it's the safest glider to crash in!". Wow - that sure makes me want to jump in one! No thank you - I prefer gliders that let you avoid a crash - since apparently 2-33s are poor in that respect!

And since the NTSB reports show that you CAN get killed in a 2-33, despite it's low approach speed, spin resistance, and sturdy structure (?!), maybe it's fabled crash safety is just an urban myth.

Prove me wrong; I would love to see data to that effect.

Heck, now I'm going to have to fly our club's 2-33 this weekend just for kicks...you know, living on the edge and all...

Cheers,

Kirk
66

Kirk

Kinda like the Piper Cub - it's so slow it can just -barely- kill you...


"kirk.stant" wrote in message
...
On Thursday, October 24, 2013 4:48:16 PM UTC-5, son_of_flubber wrote:

I only have anecdotes wrt survivability of 2-33 crashes, but your anecdote
seems pretty favorable. I'd be happy to simply break an ankle and hop
away from the front seat of a stalled and crashed glider.

It wasn't a stall spin, it was a full-stalled hard landing (launched into a
dust devil and released early, then full aft stick until impact in the
desert - by a commercial pilot giving a ride, no less. Amazingly poor
airmanship!).

But without data of other similar events in other types of gliders, all our
comments are just opinions. It could be that the 2-33 is the safest method
of transportation known to man, but I "personally" doubt it.

I do find it amusing that one of the first defenses raised whenever the 2-33
is discussed is that "it's the safest glider to crash in!". Wow - that sure
makes me want to jump in one! No thank you - I prefer gliders that let you
avoid a crash - since apparently 2-33s are poor in that respect!

And since the NTSB reports show that you CAN get killed in a 2-33, despite
it's low approach speed, spin resistance, and sturdy structure (?!), maybe
it's fabled crash safety is just an urban myth.

Prove me wrong; I would love to see data to that effect.

Heck, now I'm going to have to fly our club's 2-33 this weekend just for
kicks...you know, living on the edge and all...

Cheers,

Kirk
66

Kirk

On Friday, October 25, 2013 12:30:37 PM UTC-5, kirk.stant wrote:

Heck, now I'm going to have to fly our club's 2-33 this weekend just for kicks...you know, living on the edge and all...

Well, I did just that yesterday. Took a tow in our just-annualled (after not flying for over a year) 2-33 (a real nice one, by the way, as 2-33s go) for a late afternoon flight. 3k ft tow, then 30 minutes in weak thermals (out lasting a K-13 and G-103 that launched after me), letting old muscle-memory fly the thing, and ending in a fun, no-spoiler slipped approach to a spot landing, stopping in front of the hangar.

What a piece of junk. No way to trim, either on tow (2-handed push) or thermalling (2-handed pull), having to be pretty much fully cross controlled to slow down enough in a 45 degree bank and work a weak thermal (full aft stick, full top aileron, using the rudder to push the nose around and setup the proper slip angle!), uncomfortable because of the low seatback and back seat rudder pedal housings...at least the visibility from the front is good (cuz it sure isn't from the back!). Everything seems to happen in slow motion - especially roll, since you only have a couple of inches of stick displacement before your leg gets in the way.

Now before you start yelling, I'll admit that I'm not a small guy (although I fit comfortably in my LS6) - and sure a small kid will have tons of room.. That is true. Funny, though, most of our current students are not young kids. They are older, more "mature" guys. Hmmm...

I must say it was fun slipping it down to the ground, because you can really SEE the ground come up and hold that slip to the very last moment...then straighten up, roll the mainwheel on the ground, then when ready let the skid do the work of stopping. Who needs whimpy spoilers or wheel brakes!

Did I have fun? Of course! The thing is a hoot to fly, just like it's fun to drive a really old car - say a 65 Beetle. Is it in any way representative of how you fly a modern glider? Hell no! Is it a good initial trainer? I'll let you CFIGs fight over that, but if my son or daughter suddenly wanted to learn to fly gliders, I would tell them to avoid the 2-33 like the plague until they had their rating, then get checked out in one just to see what it was like in the good old days, before computers, cell phones, or the interwebnet thingy!

Cheers!

Kirk
66