X-43A successful flight

"monkey" wrote...

Here's a great one about Tarver - he claims he designed the F/A-18
simulator, and as a pilot on an F-18 squadron I challenged one of his
opinions about his knowledge of F/A-18 FCS.

Actually, in a discussion that was (at the time) on the topic of the F-18,
tarver claimed to have designed the HARV simulator.

When I did the tarver-approved google search, however, I found:

"Your search - HARV simulator tarver - did not match any documents."


When I looked at "F/A-18 and HARV Data" in
http://www10.pair.com/jsalvati/resources.htm, though, I found 11 documents
listed. In a search for "Tarver" in each one of them, I found:

"No occurrences of:

Tarver

were found in the document."


In a search for "Tarver in documents containing "HARV" at
http://www2.cemr.wvu.edu/~wwwflt/new_page_3.htm, there were 0 hits.

[Note: Lest you think the search was faulty, I DID find a reference to the
"Jack Tarver Library Gallery" and "Mercer Aims High with NASA Research" and "The
high aspect ratio vessel, or HARV" in an issue of the Mercer University (GA)
newspaper at http://www.mercer.edu/publications/I...er/Nov2000.pdf in that same
search.]


That would be very upsetting if I were expecting the "designer" of HARV to be
acknowledged in ANY of the documents available on-line, and if I expected that
designer to be John Tarver.

On 1 Apr 2004 19:15:23 -0800, (monkey) wrote:

I came across a USN NATOPS manual today which cements in my mind that
Tarver is completely full of ****.

It took a manual to do that? His daily posts are conclusive evidence.

Coddle, coddle, coddle...

------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Rich Ahrens | Homepage: http://www.visi.com/~rma/ |
|-----------------------------------------------|
|"In a world full of people only some want to fly - isn't that crazy?" |
------------------------------------------------------------------------

"John R Weiss" wrote in message
news:Sy6bc.54251$gA5.707204@attbi_s03...
"monkey" wrote...

Here's a great one about Tarver - he claims he designed the F/A-18
simulator, and as a pilot on an F-18 squadron I challenged one of his
opinions about his knowledge of F/A-18 FCS.

Actually, in a discussion that was (at the time) on the topic of the F-18,
tarver claimed to have designed the HARV simulator.

When I did the tarver-approved google search, however, I found:

"Your search - HARV simulator tarver - did not match any documents."

Yep, Dryden even went so far as to claim a co-op named Foster designed their
F/A-18 simulator in NASA Tech Briefs. The little cock sucker Foster
designed a fish scale the year Martha Evans and I backed out the F/A-18
flight control computer. The simulator is identical to the copy at Pax
River made from Hornet #3. Shafer remined in denial as the Government
eliminated her and her husband's civil service slots right trough the time
Dryden had their $40 million in Tarver rain pulled. FAA enjoys about $1
billion in Tarver rain today, so they won't be attempting to discredit me
like the idiots of Dryden. Well actually, with all the layoffs Dryden will
have another 150 civil servants out in December to go with the 100
contractors and 20 civil servants this fiscal year the dead wood may be
purged.

Besides that Weiss dip****, nothing in your post changes how the stick in
the F/A-18 works,

"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
isi.com...
On 1 Apr 2004 19:15:23 -0800, (monkey) wrote:

I came across a USN NATOPS manual today which cements in my mind that
Tarver is completely full of ****.

It took a manual to do that? His daily posts are conclusive evidence.

Coddle, coddle, coddle...

Yep. Monkey is new at ram and just got caught lying about being an F/A-18
pilot.

"JL Grasso" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 07:02:56 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


"John R Weiss" wrote in message
news:Sy6bc.54251$gA5.707204@attbi_s03...
"monkey" wrote...

Here's a great one about Tarver - he claims he designed the F/A-18
simulator, and as a pilot on an F-18 squadron I challenged one of his
opinions about his knowledge of F/A-18 FCS.

Actually, in a discussion that was (at the time) on the topic of the
F-18,
tarver claimed to have designed the HARV simulator.

When I did the tarver-approved google search, however, I found:

"Your search - HARV simulator tarver - did not match any
documents."

Yep, Dryden even went so far as to claim a co-op named Foster designed
their
F/A-18 simulator in NASA Tech Briefs. The little cock sucker Foster
designed a fish scale the year Martha Evans and I backed out the F/A-18
flight control computer. The simulator is identical to the copy at Pax
River made from Hornet #3. Shafer remined in denial as the Government
eliminated her and her husband's civil service slots right trough the
time
Dryden had their $40 million in Tarver rain pulled. FAA enjoys about $1
billion in Tarver rain today, so they won't be attempting to discredit me
like the idiots of Dryden. Well actually, with all the layoffs Dryden
will
have another 150 civil servants out in December to go with the 100
contractors and 20 civil servants this fiscal year the dead wood may be
purged.

Besides that Weiss dip****, nothing in your post changes how the stick in
the F/A-18 works,

Is that what you've nicknamed your old POS firebird with the 3-speed
column?

400 CID to 400 THD on the floor with 450 horsies, the top down roaring up
PCH. Even the antique BMWs take a look.

Tarver Engineering wrote:

"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
isi.com...

On 1 Apr 2004 19:15:23 -0800, (monkey) wrote:


I came across a USN NATOPS manual today which cements in my mind that
Tarver is completely full of ****.

It took a manual to do that? His daily posts are conclusive evidence.

Coddle, coddle, coddle...


Yep. Monkey is new at ram and just got caught lying about being an F/A-18
pilot.

You did?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Rich Ahrens | Homepage: http://www.visi.com/~rma/ |
|-----------------------------------------------|
|"In a world full of people only some want to fly - isn't that crazy?" |
------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
isi.com...
Tarver Engineering wrote:

"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
isi.com...

On 1 Apr 2004 19:15:23 -0800, (monkey) wrote:


I came across a USN NATOPS manual today which cements in my mind that
Tarver is completely full of ****.

It took a manual to do that? His daily posts are conclusive evidence.

Coddle, coddle, coddle...


Yep. Monkey is new at ram and just got caught lying about being an
F/A-18
pilot.

You did?

Yep, caught monkey dead to rights.

Tarver Engineering wrote:

"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
isi.com...

Tarver Engineering wrote:


"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
r.visi.com...


On 1 Apr 2004 19:15:23 -0800, (monkey) wrote:



I came across a USN NATOPS manual today which cements in my mind that
Tarver is completely full of ****.

It took a manual to do that? His daily posts are conclusive evidence.

Coddle, coddle, coddle...


Yep. Monkey is new at ram and just got caught lying about being an

F/A-18

pilot.

You did?

Yep, caught monkey dead to rights.

No, you got caught lying. Which is about as difficult as shooting fish
in a barrel, of course...

Coddle, coddle, coddle...

------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Rich Ahrens | Homepage: http://www.visi.com/~rma/ |
|-----------------------------------------------|
|"In a world full of people only some want to fly - isn't that crazy?" |
------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
isi.com...
On 1 Apr 2004 19:15:23 -0800, (monkey) wrote:

I came across a USN NATOPS manual today which cements in my mind that
Tarver is completely full of ****.

It took a manual to do that? His daily posts are conclusive evidence.

Coddle, coddle, coddle...

Yep. Monkey is new at ram and just got caught lying about being an F/A-18
pilot.


whereas you get caught lying on nearly everything you post.

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"monkey" wrote in message
om...


Here's a great one about Tarver - he claims he designed the F/A-18
simulator, and as a pilot on an F-18 squadron I challenged one of his
opinions about his knowledge of F/A-18 FCS.

And you were completely wrong while exposing yourself as either an
incompetent, or a liar. There is an entire group of frauds at ada you can
join and obsess to your heart's content, sock.

and john, you are completely wrong about everything. no one would
even take your word on the time of day, you would get that completely
arse about face too.

after all john you are the biggest fraud on ADA, you claim so much
knowledge and you didnt even know what Part 25 pertained to.

you also claim that "Total" and "Average" are interchangable terms,

you also claim that budweiser is the biggest selling beer in oz,

you also claim a spoiler is flap,

you claim a spoiler is a wing,

you claim that Pitot tubes are not istalled on aircraft as it would be
unsafe to put a mud bee home on aircraft,

you claim that Pitot is the frech word for tube,

and i personally love this one for absloute ****ing jibberish:

"Retarding the throttles will cease the engines from adding thrust, my
silly
rodent. Reducing pilot workload gives the Operator more time to
deploy
Spoiler Flaps into a Speed Brake configuration."


yep John, you are the king of wrong.