![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Felger Carbon" wrote in message link.net... "Harry Andreas" wrote in message ... In article , John Cook wrote: Just the official reports!!, Lockheed has only purchased enough processors for 155 F-22's because there out of production, the demand for Air to ground operations has increased the demand on processing power, something the original processors are not quite upto hence the _need_ for the 'upgrade'. So the processors are obsolete, (too old)... the Avionic architecture needs to be replaced before the F-22 can become the F/A-22 because the present system is based on the old processors and rewriting the code is pointless on an obsolete system, that would only support half of the F-22 fleet Methinks there's some confusion there between processors, avionics architecture, and software. While it's true that Intel tried to shut down i960 production causing a chinese fire drill, there are enough assets to get by until a new processor is ready. Full disclosu I'm a retired electrical engineer. I specialized in high-end embedded microprocessors, which the "i960" in the F-22 is. I know nothing about designing aircraft. I do know a little about the Intel processor at the heart of the F-22: The i960MX was designed by Intel specifically and solely for the F-22. Nope, the i960 is a processor designed to control printers. The i860, the predicessor of the i960, was designed for the i432 MPP system. The i432 nearly bankrupted Intel and caused them to have to sell 16% of the company, a controlling interest, to IBM. The Brits were the only ones to ever get any software to run on the i432 MPP and Lochkeed is lucky to have them writing the software. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 17:43:06 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote: "Felger Carbon" wrote in message hlink.net... "Harry Andreas" wrote in message ... In article , John Cook wrote: Just the official reports!!, Lockheed has only purchased enough processors for 155 F-22's because there out of production, the demand for Air to ground operations has increased the demand on processing power, something the original processors are not quite upto hence the _need_ for the 'upgrade'. So the processors are obsolete, (too old)... the Avionic architecture needs to be replaced before the F-22 can become the F/A-22 because the present system is based on the old processors and rewriting the code is pointless on an obsolete system, that would only support half of the F-22 fleet Methinks there's some confusion there between processors, avionics architecture, and software. While it's true that Intel tried to shut down i960 production causing a chinese fire drill, there are enough assets to get by until a new processor is ready. Full disclosu I'm a retired electrical engineer. I specialized in high-end embedded microprocessors, which the "i960" in the F-22 is. I know nothing about designing aircraft. I do know a little about the Intel processor at the heart of the F-22: The i960MX was designed by Intel specifically and solely for the F-22. Nope, the i960 is a processor designed to control printers. http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-04-391 "The F/A-22 is dependent on its onboard computers and software to perform its mission. Unlike other fighter aircraft, it has a highly advanced,integrated avionics system capable of detecting, identifying, and engaging the enemy at ranges beyond a pilot’s vision. The key to the F/A-22 avionics lies in its fully integrated core architecture and its two central, networked computers called common integrated processors (CIP).CIPs use very high-speed integrated circuits to collect, process, and integrate data and signals from the aircraft’s sensors. CIP serves as the “brains” for the F/A-22’s integrated avionics system and is unique to this aircraft. The primary processor in CIP is the Intel i960MX microprocessor,which is used strictly for avionics processing. This microprocessor is based on 1990’s technology and has a 32-bit processor that operates at speeds of 25mhz." etc. Caught bull****ting again Splappy? Phil -- Great Tarverisms #3 No, a flap makes the wing thicker and thereby creates more bernoulli lift. John P. Tarver, MS/PE rec.aviation.military 09 January 2003 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Phil Miller" wrote in message ... On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 17:43:06 -0800, "Tarver Engineering" wrote: "Felger Carbon" wrote in message hlink.net... "Harry Andreas" wrote in message ... In article , John Cook wrote: Just the official reports!!, Lockheed has only purchased enough processors for 155 F-22's because there out of production, the demand for Air to ground operations has increased the demand on processing power, something the original processors are not quite upto hence the _need_ for the 'upgrade'. So the processors are obsolete, (too old)... the Avionic architecture needs to be replaced before the F-22 can become the F/A-22 because the present system is based on the old processors and rewriting the code is pointless on an obsolete system, that would only support half of the F-22 fleet Methinks there's some confusion there between processors, avionics architecture, and software. While it's true that Intel tried to shut down i960 production causing a chinese fire drill, there are enough assets to get by until a new processor is ready. Full disclosu I'm a retired electrical engineer. I specialized in high-end embedded microprocessors, which the "i960" in the F-22 is. I know nothing about designing aircraft. I do know a little about the Intel processor at the heart of the F-22: The i960MX was designed by Intel specifically and solely for the F-22. Nope, the i960 is a processor designed to control printers. http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-04-391 "The F/A-22 is dependent on its onboard computers and software to perform its mission. Unlike other fighter aircraft, it has a highly advanced,integrated avionics system capable of detecting, identifying, and engaging the enemy at ranges beyond a pilot's vision. The key to the F/A-22 avionics lies in its fully integrated core architecture and its two central, networked computers called common integrated processors (CIP).CIPs use very high-speed integrated circuits to collect, process, and integrate data and signals from the aircraft's sensors. CIP serves as the "brains" for the F/A-22's integrated avionics system and is unique to this aircraft. The primary processor in CIP is the Intel i960MX microprocessor,which is used strictly for avionics processing. This microprocessor is based on 1990's technology and has a 32-bit processor that operates at speeds of 25mhz." etc. Caught bull****ting again Splappy? Not me. Do you even have a clue what you cut and pasted, moron? As Mr. cook pointed out, the i960 is very obsolete. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 19:50:44 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote: Not me. Do you even have a clue what you cut and pasted, moron? As Mr. cook pointed out, the i960 is very obsolete. Obsolete? Ok. So? Let's simplify this thread a bit. "Felger Carbon" said; The i960MX was designed by Intel specifically and solely for the F-22. You said; Nope, the i960 is a processor designed to control printers. I found this; http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-04-391 The primary processor in CIP is the Intel i960MX microprocessor,which is used strictly for avionics processing. Pretty obvious I think. Phil -- Great Tarverisms #7 Pitot: French word meaning tube. John alt.disasters.aviation 25 February 2002 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Phil Miller" wrote in message ... On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 19:50:44 -0800, "Tarver Engineering" wrote: Not me. Do you even have a clue what you cut and pasted, moron? As Mr. cook pointed out, the i960 is very obsolete. Obsolete? Ok. So? Let's simplify this thread a bit. "Felger Carbon" said; The i960MX was designed by Intel specifically and solely for the F-22. You said; Nope, the i960 is a processor designed to control printers. I found this; http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-04-391 The primary processor in CIP is the Intel i960MX microprocessor,which is used strictly for avionics processing. Pretty obvious I think. Yep, you somehow believe because Phill Miller is clueless, others must be clueless as well. I was correct and what Felger wrote is wrong. I do wonder at Phil's reading disability sometimes. The i960 has no application outside Lockmart's MPP. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Tarver Engineering"
wrote: The primary processor in CIP is the Intel i960MX microprocessor,which is used strictly for avionics processing. Pretty obvious I think. Yep, you somehow believe because Phill Miller is clueless, others must be clueless as well. I was correct and what Felger wrote is wrong. I do wonder at Phil's reading disability sometimes. The i960 has no application outside Lockmart's MPP. Not true. The i960 was used on several other programs. I worked on some of them myself. -- Harry Andreas Engineering raconteur |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Andreas" wrote in message ... In article , "Tarver Engineering" wrote: The primary processor in CIP is the Intel i960MX microprocessor,which is used strictly for avionics processing. Pretty obvious I think. Yep, you somehow believe because Phill Miller is clueless, others must be clueless as well. I was correct and what Felger wrote is wrong. I do wonder at Phil's reading disability sometimes. The i960 has no application outside Lockmart's MPP. Not true. The i960 was used on several other programs. I worked on some of them myself. We have several statements including the GAO claiming that the i960 is now F-22 only. I stated in my other posts that the i960 was a printer control processor in the real world.(so obsolete) The real problem for Lockmart is that they are attempting to build an MPP that Intel could not build themselves and the continueing structure risk mitigation. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Tarver Engineering"
wrote: "Felger Carbon" wrote in message link.net... "Harry Andreas" wrote in message ... In article , John Cook wrote: Just the official reports!!, Lockheed has only purchased enough processors for 155 F-22's because there out of production, the demand for Air to ground operations has increased the demand on processing power, something the original processors are not quite upto hence the _need_ for the 'upgrade'. So the processors are obsolete, (too old)... the Avionic architecture needs to be replaced before the F-22 can become the F/A-22 because the present system is based on the old processors and rewriting the code is pointless on an obsolete system, that would only support half of the F-22 fleet Methinks there's some confusion there between processors, avionics architecture, and software. While it's true that Intel tried to shut down i960 production causing a chinese fire drill, there are enough assets to get by until a new processor is ready. Full disclosu I'm a retired electrical engineer. I specialized in high-end embedded microprocessors, which the "i960" in the F-22 is. I know nothing about designing aircraft. I do know a little about the Intel processor at the heart of the F-22: The i960MX was designed by Intel specifically and solely for the F-22. Nope, the i960 is a processor designed to control printers. There were several flavors of the i960, most of which were purely commercial and were used as printer drivers among other things. The MX was the military version that had the 33rd bit for security, which was unique among the other processors and is one of the reasons the i960 was selected in the first place. (rest of off-topic stuff snipped) -- Harry Andreas Engineering raconteur |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Andreas" wrote in message ... In article , "Tarver Engineering" wrote: "Felger Carbon" wrote in message link.net... "Harry Andreas" wrote in message ... In article , John Cook wrote: Just the official reports!!, Lockheed has only purchased enough processors for 155 F-22's because there out of production, the demand for Air to ground operations has increased the demand on processing power, something the original processors are not quite upto hence the _need_ for the 'upgrade'. So the processors are obsolete, (too old)... the Avionic architecture needs to be replaced before the F-22 can become the F/A-22 because the present system is based on the old processors and rewriting the code is pointless on an obsolete system, that would only support half of the F-22 fleet Methinks there's some confusion there between processors, avionics architecture, and software. While it's true that Intel tried to shut down i960 production causing a chinese fire drill, there are enough assets to get by until a new processor is ready. Full disclosu I'm a retired electrical engineer. I specialized in high-end embedded microprocessors, which the "i960" in the F-22 is. I know nothing about designing aircraft. I do know a little about the Intel processor at the heart of the F-22: The i960MX was designed by Intel specifically and solely for the F-22. Nope, the i960 is a processor designed to control printers. There were several flavors of the i960, most of which were purely commercial and were used as printer drivers among other things. The i960 is the follow on of the i860, from which Intel produced the i432 MPP. The i432 was such a failure that Intel was nearly bankrupt and was forced to sell a controlling interest of 16% of Intel to IBM; it was through this transaction that IBM was able to corner the 8088 market. The i960 found application as a printer processor in the commercial world until some years ago. Lockmart got the bright idea of using the i960 to replicate Intel's i432 MPP success in the Raptor. snip of Harry making things up |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Tarver Engineering"
wrote: "Harry Andreas" wrote in message ... In article , "Tarver Engineering" wrote: "Felger Carbon" wrote in message link.net... "Harry Andreas" wrote in message ... In article , John Cook wrote: Just the official reports!!, Lockheed has only purchased enough processors for 155 F-22's because there out of production, the demand for Air to ground operations has increased the demand on processing power, something the original processors are not quite upto hence the _need_ for the 'upgrade'. So the processors are obsolete, (too old)... the Avionic architecture needs to be replaced before the F-22 can become the F/A-22 because the present system is based on the old processors and rewriting the code is pointless on an obsolete system, that would only support half of the F-22 fleet Methinks there's some confusion there between processors, avionics architecture, and software. While it's true that Intel tried to shut down i960 production causing a chinese fire drill, there are enough assets to get by until a new processor is ready. Full disclosu I'm a retired electrical engineer. I specialized in high-end embedded microprocessors, which the "i960" in the F-22 is. I know nothing about designing aircraft. I do know a little about the Intel processor at the heart of the F-22: The i960MX was designed by Intel specifically and solely for the F-22. Nope, the i960 is a processor designed to control printers. There were several flavors of the i960, most of which were purely commercial and were used as printer drivers among other things. The i960 is the follow on of the i860, from which Intel produced the i432 MPP. The i432 was such a failure that Intel was nearly bankrupt and was forced to sell a controlling interest of 16% of Intel to IBM; it was through this transaction that IBM was able to corner the 8088 market. The i960 found application as a printer processor in the commercial world until some years ago. Lockmart got the bright idea of using the i960 to replicate Intel's i432 MPP success in the Raptor. snip of Harry making things up Well John, I was there. Funny, I didn't see you name listed on the IPT. Mine was. All this i860 & 432 stuff is just smoke that has no bearing on the decision to use the i960. Lockheed had no say, BTW, in the i960 decision. That was an internal Hughes decision and we had a lot of selling to do with our customer. The stuff you snipped has the real reason for the selection of the MX over the competition. I was there. -- Harry Andreas Engineering raconteur |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|