A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Air America breaking news: "USA to fingerprint ALL visitors !!!"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 3rd 04, 02:55 PM
Quantum Foam Guy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Oelewapper" wrote in message
...
Dear allies, welcome to the age of digital fascism... :


This is not "fascism", unless you're one of those morons who thinks dealing
with the DMV and getting fingerprinted for a driver's license is "fascism".
When you lace your writing with such stupid hyperbole, you've lost your
credibility.

You're also mistaken if you think this will be limited to the US. Wealthy
democracies will all be implementing these very same procedures. If you
doubt me, wait and see what happens after the next round of terrorist
attacks.

Millions of visitors from some of the United States' closest allies soon
will have to be fingerprinted and photographed before entering the

country,
U.S. officials said yesterday.



  #2  
Old April 3rd 04, 03:19 PM
Marie Lewis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Quantum Foam Guy" wrote in message
...
"Oelewapper" wrote in message
...
Dear allies, welcome to the age of digital fascism... :


This is not "fascism", unless you're one of those morons who thinks

dealing
with the DMV and getting fingerprinted for a driver's license is

"fascism".
When you lace your writing with such stupid hyperbole, you've lost your
credibility.


Please note that fingerprinting is not nearly as common in, for example, the
UK, as in the USA.
Here, you have to be suspected of a crime to be foingerprinted, and if you
are innocent, those prints are destroyed.

You're also mistaken if you think this will be limited to the US. Wealthy
democracies will all be implementing these very same procedures. If you
doubt me, wait and see what happens after the next round of terrorist
attacks.


We have had many, many terrorist attacks in the UK (many financed by the
USA) and have never founnd this necessary or useful. I am 67 and have never
had my finger prints taken.
If the present government were to introduce it, then, in spite of being a
life long member opf the Labour party, at elections I would vote against
them. It matters that much.

So, I doubt you. Other countries are not so

Millions of visitors from some of the United States' closest allies soon
will have to be fingerprinted and photographed before entering the

country,
U.S. officials said yesterday.


There won't be as many millions in future.




  #3  
Old April 3rd 04, 06:12 PM
Trust No One®
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Marie Lewis" wrote in message
...


Please note that fingerprinting is not nearly as common in, for example,

the
UK, as in the USA.
Here, you have to be suspected of a crime to be foingerprinted, and if you
are innocent, those prints are destroyed.


I'm afraid the writing is on the wall for the UK

Already the police can take and retain DNA samples if they arrest you; these
samples are retained even if you're not subsequently charged with a crime.

Fingerprinting will probably come in with ID cards. I'd be very surprised if
the cards are not made compulsory as the police are bleating for this.

Brgds,

--
Peter X-Files Fan
Please Note: Emailed replies cc'd / bcc'd , containing HTML or attachments
auto-binned as spam



  #4  
Old April 4th 04, 05:58 AM
Quantum Foam Guy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Marie Lewis" wrote in message
...

"Quantum Foam Guy" wrote in message
...
"Oelewapper" wrote in message
...
Dear allies, welcome to the age of digital fascism... :


This is not "fascism", unless you're one of those morons who thinks

dealing
with the DMV and getting fingerprinted for a driver's license is

"fascism".
When you lace your writing with such stupid hyperbole, you've lost your
credibility.


Please note that fingerprinting is not nearly as common in, for example,

the
UK, as in the USA.
Here, you have to be suspected of a crime to be foingerprinted, and if you
are innocent, those prints are destroyed.

You're also mistaken if you think this will be limited to the US.

Wealthy
democracies will all be implementing these very same procedures. If you
doubt me, wait and see what happens after the next round of terrorist
attacks.


We have had many, many terrorist attacks in the UK (many financed by the
USA)


Name one terrorist attack in the UK financed by the USA. Stuff that happened
200 years ago doesn't count.

I know what you are referring to, of course. The US government didn't fund
IRA terrorists, Marie, unless Ted Kennedy had a secret slush fund that we
don't know about. To say the USA "financed" the IRA is therefore very
disengenuous of you. What happened in the 1970s and 1980s was a group of
private stoopid Irish-American citizens (not the American government) gave
money to the IRA. Victims of IRA violence should sue in US courts the morons
who did this. I can only wonder why this hasn't happened. Outside of
"Southie" (a certain part of Boston), such a trial would be a slam-dunk for
the UK plaintiffs. I certainly think families of victims of the IRA deserve
all the money they can get.

and have never founnd this necessary or useful. I am 67 and have never
had my finger prints taken.
If the present government were to introduce it, then, in spite of being a
life long member opf the Labour party, at elections I would vote against
them. It matters that much.

So, I doubt you. Other countries are not so


I respect your opinion about fingerprinting, Marie. I truly do. As a
life-long member of the Labour Party, I'm sure you won't be voting for the
Tories. So when UK customs and integration begins fingerprinting inbound
visitors to the UK, who will you vote for?


  #5  
Old April 4th 04, 05:04 AM
nobody
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Greg Morrow wrote:
I know what you are referring to, of course. The US government didn't fund
IRA terrorists, Marie, unless Ted Kennedy had a secret slush fund that we
don't know about.


The USA is as guilty with regards to the IRA as the Taliban was with Al Queda:
they not only tolerated their presence, not only made no effort to stop them,
but also morally supported them. "freedom fighters".

When the IRA bombed the HSBC headquarters in London, did the USA act to freeze
the funds of known IRA supporters ? NOP.
  #6  
Old April 4th 04, 07:04 AM
Quantum Foam Guy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

JF Mezei wrote in message
...
Greg Morrow wrote:


Greg didn't write this, JF. I did. Learn how to operate a newsreader
properly. It's not difficult.

I know what you are referring to, of course. The US government didn't

fund
IRA terrorists, Marie, unless Ted Kennedy had a secret slush fund that

we
don't know about.


The USA is as guilty with regards to the IRA as the Taliban was with Al

Queda:

I've never funded the IRA, JF. My tax dollars didn't pay for the brutal
murder of British civilians. A small group of Irish-American assholes in
Boston gave money to the IRA. And they weren't the only source of IRA funds.
Besides local sources in Northern Ireland, the IRA also liked to pal around
with certain Middle Eastern groups. You did know that, right?

they not only tolerated their presence, not only made no effort to stop

them,
but also morally supported them. "freedom fighters".


I'm not old enough to remember the complete history of the IRA, JF. Perhaps
you are. I don't remember any "moral support" from the US government for the
IRA. Did the British government contact the FBI to track these Boston
assholes down, and if so, when do you think the families of the victims of
IRA terrorism will sue them? If I was to serve on such a jury I would
certainly find for the plaintiffs. As would just about any American outside
of certain Boston neighborhoods.


  #7  
Old April 4th 04, 10:19 AM
Marie Lewis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Quantum Foam Guy" wrote in message
...
Name one terrorist attack in the UK financed by the USA. Stuff that

happened
200 years ago doesn't count.

I know what you are referring to, of course. The US government didn't fund
IRA terrorists, Marie,


I did not say the US givernment had financed the IRA. I may suspect that
iut did, but I have no proof, so I would not write that.

unless Ted Kennedy had a secret slush fund that we
don't know about.


Possible.

To say the USA "financed" the IRA is therefore very
disengenuous of you.


Not at all.

What happened in the 1970s and 1980s was a group of
private stoopid Irish-American citizens (not the American government) gave
money to the IRA. Victims of IRA violence should sue in US courts the

morons
who did this. I can only wonder why this hasn't happened.


We are not so litigious as you.


I respect your opinion about fingerprinting, Marie. I truly do. As a
life-long member of the Labour Party, I'm sure you won't be voting for the
Tories. So when UK customs and integration begins fingerprinting inbound
visitors to the UK, who will you vote for?


Probably the Liberal Democrats, possibly the Greens. I would study their
manifestos and decide, as any sensible person should.
The Labour party of today is not the one I joined.


Marie


  #8  
Old April 4th 04, 01:34 PM
Quantum Foam Guy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Marie Lewis" wrote in message
...

"Quantum Foam Guy" wrote in message
...
Name one terrorist attack in the UK financed by the USA. Stuff that

happened
200 years ago doesn't count.

I know what you are referring to, of course. The US government didn't

fund
IRA terrorists, Marie,


I did not say the US givernment had financed the IRA. I may suspect that
iut did, but I have no proof, so I would not write that.


You sure did imply that, Marie. I think it's telling that you snipped out
what you now deny saying: "We have had many, many terrorist attacks in the
UK (many financed by the USA)".

unless Ted Kennedy had a secret slush fund that we
don't know about.


Possible.


Only if you're paranoid or hate the US so much that you'll believe any
stupid conspiracy tale as long as it's hateful.

To say the USA "financed" the IRA is therefore very
disengenuous of you.


Not at all.


Yes, Marie. Your statement is very disengenuous. It's also quite hateful of
you.

What happened in the 1970s and 1980s was a group of
private stoopid Irish-American citizens (not the American government)

gave
money to the IRA. Victims of IRA violence should sue in US courts the

morons
who did this. I can only wonder why this hasn't happened.


We are not so litigious as you.


This is hardly litigious. This is about right and wrong. Suing these people
would greatly help the families of the victims and teach the perps a lesson.

I respect your opinion about fingerprinting, Marie. I truly do. As a
life-long member of the Labour Party, I'm sure you won't be voting for

the
Tories. So when UK customs and integration begins fingerprinting inbound
visitors to the UK, who will you vote for?


Probably the Liberal Democrats, possibly the Greens. I would study their
manifestos and decide, as any sensible person should.
The Labour party of today is not the one I joined.



  #9  
Old April 4th 04, 02:15 PM
Marie Lewis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Quantum Foam Guy" wrote in message
...
"Marie Lewis" wrote in message
...

"Quantum Foam Guy" wrote in message
...
Name one terrorist attack in the UK financed by the USA. Stuff that

happened
200 years ago doesn't count.

I know what you are referring to, of course. The US government didn't

fund
IRA terrorists, Marie,


I did not say the US givernment had financed the IRA. I may suspect

that
iut did, but I have no proof, so I would not write that.


You sure did imply that, Marie. I think it's telling that you snipped out
what you now deny saying: "We have had many, many terrorist attacks in the
UK (many financed by the USA)".


Read thyat again. Where is the word "government" mentioned?

unless Ted Kennedy had a secret slush fund that we
don't know about.


Possible.


Only if you're paranoid or hate the US so much that you'll believe any
stupid conspiracy tale as long as it's hateful.


No: all governements have a secret slush fund. You are naive if you believe
otherwise.

To say the USA "financed" the IRA is therefore very
disengenuous of you.


Not at all.


Yes, Marie. Your statement is very disengenuous. It's also quite hateful

of
you.


Not at all: we used to love visiting the USA.


What happened in the 1970s and 1980s was a group of
private stoopid Irish-American citizens (not the American government)

gave
money to the IRA. Victims of IRA violence should sue in US courts the

morons
who did this. I can only wonder why this hasn't happened.


We are not so litigious as you.


This is hardly litigious. This is about right and wrong. Suing these

people
would greatly help the families of the victims and teach the perps a

lesson.

I respect your opinion about fingerprinting, Marie. I truly do. As a
life-long member of the Labour Party, I'm sure you won't be voting for

the
Tories. So when UK customs and integration begins fingerprinting

inbound
visitors to the UK, who will you vote for?


Probably the Liberal Democrats, possibly the Greens. I would study

their
manifestos and decide, as any sensible person should.
The Labour party of today is not the one I joined.



No reply to this I see.


  #10  
Old April 5th 04, 08:47 AM
Gary L. Dare
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quantum Foam Guy wrote:

I know what you are referring to, of course. The US government didn't fund
IRA terrorists, Marie, unless Ted Kennedy had a secret slush fund that we
don't know about. To say the USA "financed" the IRA is therefore very
disengenuous of you. What happened in the 1970s and 1980s was a group of
private stoopid Irish-American citizens (not the American government) gave
money to the IRA.


Agree ... US-financed =/= American-financed.

A good point. I hope that you made that point a year ago, too,
distinguishing
German and French citizens and private enterprises from their governments.

gld


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
30 Jan 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 January 31st 04 03:55 AM
15 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 December 15th 03 10:01 PM
27 Nov 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 1 November 30th 03 05:57 PM
18 Sep 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 19th 03 03:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.