![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 07:13 22 December 2013, Ian wrote:
On 12/21/2013 10:43 PM, wrote: The fat lady has warbled ..... Then I think it is a fair time to comment on the handicapping that was used, particularly as applied to 15m class: For example on 2013-12-16: ASW 20 03:24:39 111.5km/h 380.4km 1000 ASW 27 03:05:24 123.1km/h 380.4km 910 The ASW 27 is 12km/h faster than the ASW 20 but it is scored 900 points less. How fast does the '27 driver have to go before he can get 1000 points too? Ian Ian, In strong conditions an ASW27 is amazingly fast and to be only about 10% faster than a ASW20 is really not enough, though it looks as if the 20 pilot did do something clever/lucky since he scored top marks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 23/12/2013 05:52, Peter Stafford Allen wrote:
At 07:13 22 December 2013, Ian wrote: The ASW 27 is 12km/h faster than the ASW 20 but it is scored 900 points less. How fast does the '27 driver have to go before he can get 1000 points too? Ian Ian, In strong conditions an ASW27 is amazingly fast and to be only about 10% faster than a ASW20 is really not enough, though it looks as if the 20 pilot did do something clever/lucky since he scored top marks So... Does he get a better handicap when conditions aren't 'strong'? Or does he just have to lose even more badly? The BGA handicaps the 20 at 100. On that basis your handicap was over 112 and at that point you're the only 15m glider. All the others at that level (110+) are 18m or wider. You were robbed, Ian. The BGA handicaps the 27 at 104. You need to start offering brown envelopes to the scorer. Flying better won't get you anywhere. GC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/23/2013 09:57 AM, GC wrote:
You were robbed, Ian. Just for the record. I don't fly an ASW 27, nor even an ASW 20 and I did not participate in that competition. If I had been there I would have been well behind both of the pilots I quoted - irrespective of any handicap that I might have been given. I would be very reluctant to make public comment about a competition if I had been there. But I read the scores on the 'net and I thought it was a bit tough on some of the guys. Ian |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 23/12/2013 20:23, Ian wrote:
On 12/23/2013 09:57 AM, GC wrote: You were robbed, Ian. Just for the record. I don't fly an ASW 27, nor even an ASW 20 and I did not participate in that competition. If I had been there I would have been well behind both of the pilots I quoted - irrespective of any handicap that I might have been given. I would be very reluctant to make public comment about a competition if I had been there. But I read the scores on the 'net and I thought it was a bit tough on some of the guys. Ian Ok. Somebody else was robbed. ![]() GC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone have a link to SA nats rules & handicapping scheme? I've come up dry so far.
T8 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 13:56 23 December 2013, Evan Ludeman wrote:
Does anyone have a link to SA nats rules & handicapping scheme? I've come up dry so far. T8 I did not understand the scoring on the last day of the 18M. A two hour AAT won by a Nimbus3, but the man in second placed (JS1) was faster by 2.6 Kph and was only 1 minute 40 seconds over time, whereas the Nimbus was 3 minutes 52 seconds over time and did 0.5 km more than the JS1, but I cant see if any penalties was awarded. Vernon |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Le lundi 23 décembre 2013 14:56:49 UTC+1, Evan Ludeman a écrit*:
Does anyone have a link to SA nats rules & handicapping scheme? I've come up dry so far. T8 http://sssa.org.za/index.php/downloa...forms-and-info |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 5:50:59 AM UTC-5, wrote:
http://sssa.org.za/index.php/downloa...forms-and-info Thanks... but when I open the 'handicap' files in (my very old, v3.95) version of See You I get a score sheet from September 28... and no handicap info that I can see. I opened the file in a text editor and I see a lot of code, but again no handicaps. Just curious to see how others are handling this. Evan Ludeman / T8 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 13:17 23 December 2013, GC wrote:
On 23/12/2013 20:23, Ian wrote: On 12/23/2013 09:57 AM, GC wrote: You were robbed, Ian. Just for the record. I don't fly an ASW 27, nor even an ASW 20 and I did not participate in that competition. If I had been there I would have been well behind both of the pilots I quoted - irrespective of any handicap that I might have been given. I would be very reluctant to make public comment about a competition if I had been there. But I read the scores on the 'net and I thought it was a bit tough on some of the guys. Ian Ok. Somebody else was robbed. ![]() GC I did not understand the scoring on the last day of the 18M. A two hour AAT won by a Nimbus3, but the man in second placed (JS1) was faster by 2.6 Kph and was only 1 minute 40 seconds over time, whereas the Nimbus was 3 minutes 52 seconds over time and did 0.5 km more than the JS1, but I cant see if any penalties was awarded. Vernon |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
South African Nationals 2012 at Welkom | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | December 9th 12 11:11 PM |
South African Nationals 2011 - they're off! | stephen_p_thomas | Soaring | 0 | December 11th 11 04:01 PM |
South African Nationals | [email protected] | Soaring | 2 | December 11th 10 03:01 AM |
South African Nationals - results | stephen_p_thomas | Soaring | 0 | January 9th 10 11:44 AM |
South African Nationals - Day 1 | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | December 29th 06 02:35 PM |