![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chad Irby wrote in
om: In article , James Robinson wrote: Chad Irby wrote: "patLB" wrote: On the other hand, you could always visit Spain, and relax on their nice, safe, high-speed trains. Or the ones in France. Still waiting for the high speed trains of USA... The distances are too long. Air travel is cheaper for that sort of range, What gave you that idea. High speed trains are effective in the range of 200 to 500 miles. There are lots of large cities within that distance. Just draw a circle around Chicago or Washington, and see how many cities are enclosed. For that distance, trains have a lower operating cost and aircraft. Don't just think of transcontinental service, where aircraft have the advantage. But for the 200 to 500 mile range, people over here have *cars*, which gives them much more flexibility. Not necessarily. Cars have to be parked somewhere, which can be very expensive and just finding a place to park can be a nightmare in a larger city. Let alone a safe place for your car. Put that on top of a slow and uncomfortable ride, relative to a train, and that you are dependent on having a driver for it as well. And it's easy to get some work done on a train -- you can't work on your laptop driving a car. Besides you also need to find your way in and out of a city, which is often not desirable, and pray you don't get clogged up in traffic. That will make the trip even slower. For short to medium haul, city to city, there is nothing that can beat the modern highspeed train. At least provided it's well integrated into the overall public transportation system. Then interrailing becomes a joy. Any moron with a chunk of steel can knock a train off the tracks. ... and as we've found out, trains are far too prone to sabotage. The terrorists just picked trains for their latest attack. Trains are no more at risk than any other place where people congregate. But for transportation, they're insanely easier to target. I think trains are still the safest means of transportation. Besides it's more environmentally safe than anything. Regards... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
30 Jan 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 31st 04 03:55 AM |
15 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | December 15th 03 10:01 PM |
27 Nov 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 1 | November 30th 03 05:57 PM |
18 Sep 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 19th 03 03:47 AM |