![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good points Kevin.
On Friday, January 24, 2014 8:01:17 AM UTC-5, wrote: If a 700ft finish is too low for a 18 meter national contest, then it is probably too low for a Regional. Yes, I understand the caveat of diving off a ridge and would not have a problem with that. Last year at Perry and at Cordele, I was racing my Silent-IN, the 12 meter, 31/1 L/D. We had 700 foot finishes at both sites. I understand this is comfortable for a modern 15 or 18 meter ship and leaves plenty of margin. This does not leave much if any margin for me, and found that I needed to take extra height to be safe. I am racing too, and this leaves us essentially racing to a different finish points. You are racing to a finish height that gives you an adequate safety margin and I am racing to the same point, but having to take more altitude for the same safety factor. I understand UH's comment about immediately joining the pattern in an orderly fashion, but I think this could also be done with a 1000 foot finish and some more spoilers added. This also gives a little more room is someone has a problem on landing and obstructs the runway. Kevin 192 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, January 24, 2014 8:10:34 AM UTC-6, wrote:
Good points Kevin. On Friday, January 24, 2014 8:01:17 AM UTC-5, wrote: If a 700ft finish is too low for a 18 meter national contest, then it is probably too low for a Regional. Yes, I understand the caveat of diving off a ridge and would not have a problem with that. Last year at Perry and at Cordele, I was racing my Silent-IN, the 12 meter, 31/1 L/D. We had 700 foot finishes at both sites. I understand this is comfortable for a modern 15 or 18 meter ship and leaves plenty of margin. This does not leave much if any margin for me, and found that I needed to take extra height to be safe. I am racing too, and this leaves us essentially racing to a different finish points. You are racing to a finish height that gives you an adequate safety margin and I am racing to the same point, but having to take more altitude for the same safety factor. I understand UH's comment about immediately joining the pattern in an orderly fashion, but I think this could also be done with a 1000 foot finish and some more spoilers added. This also gives a little more room is someone has a problem on landing and obstructs the runway. Kevin 192 To add to Kevin's point. I have seen some pilots take such a long down-wind turn to final that I could have turned inside of their pattern and had plenty of room. If I were in his glider, that would be a real problem for a short wing glider. A higher finish hurts no one as long as we are all going to the same finish. If we keep the pattern tight, low energy or lower L/D gliders have an easier time transitioning to pattern and landing. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sean F2, Evan T8, HELP! Current finish cylinder rule! | Tom Kelley #711 | Soaring | 5 | May 24th 13 09:59 PM |
Safety finish rule & circle radius | Frank[_1_] | Soaring | 19 | September 12th 07 07:31 PM |
Height records? | Paul Repacholi | Soaring | 2 | September 7th 03 03:14 PM |