![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 11:54 18 February 2014, Pieter Oosthuizen wrote:
Thanks Chris - appreciate your comments! ![]() Apologies if I interpreted it incorrectly. PO I think Chris has made it pretty clear that the fitting of an automatic system is not at this time a practical solution. I think he has also made it pretty clear that once the sequence starts the result, as far as the tug is concerned, is inevitable. This is one of those situations where tug pilots are going to have to decide what risks they are willing to take. I would support any tug pilot who said that he would not tow a glider on a CoG or Compromise hook. On the other hand I would not tell him he could not do it. There is also a responsibility for those of us who teach aerotowing to really get across to students the danger, to the tug pilot, of getting out of position. I am not sure we have done this in the past, I know I have not been as pedantic as I should in getting this point home. Tug pilots do not always know the people they are towing so they are perhaps not aware of the experience, or lack of it, of the pilot on the back. In those circumstances the saviour should be the authoriser. We all know that does not work. Perhaps tug pilots need to be more circumspect in who they are prepared to tow. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 7:17:16 AM UTC-6, Don Johnstone wrote:
At 11:54 18 February 2014, Pieter Oosthuizen wrote: Thanks Chris - appreciate your comments! ![]() Apologies if I interpreted it incorrectly. PO I think Chris has made it pretty clear that the fitting of an automatic system is not at this time a practical solution. I think he has also made it pretty clear that once the sequence starts the result, as far as the tug is concerned, is inevitable. This is one of those situations where tug pilots are going to have to decide what risks they are willing to take. I would support any tug pilot who said that he would not tow a glider on a CoG or Compromise hook. On the other hand I would not tell him he could not do it. There is also a responsibility for those of us who teach aerotowing to really get across to students the danger, to the tug pilot, of getting out of position. I am not sure we have done this in the past, I know I have not been as pedantic as I should in getting this point home. Tug pilots do not always know the people they are towing so they are perhaps not aware of the experience, or lack of it, of the pilot on the back. In those circumstances the saviour should be the authoriser. We all know that does not work. Perhaps tug pilots need to be more circumspect in who they are prepared to tow. It occurred to me that attaching the tow rope to the tug near the center of gravity (top of turtle deck on a Pawnee for example) would make kiting a non-event. That's how all the RC gliders are towed since you cannot control the position of the glider really well in relation to the towplane while standing on the ground. Interference of the tow rope with rudder and elevator does not seem to be a problem for RC fliers. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, 18 February 2014 11:25:24 UTC-5, wrote:
On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 7:17:16 AM UTC-6, Don Johnstone wrote: It occurred to me that attaching the tow rope to the tug near the center of gravity (top of turtle deck on a Pawnee for example) would make kiting a non-event. That's how all the RC gliders are towed since you cannot control the position of the glider really well in relation to the towplane while standing on the ground. Interference of the tow rope with rudder and elevator does not seem to be a problem for RC fliers. Um... wouldn't that cause a great risk of fouling the tail feathers of the tug? No more "boxing the wash". |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 16:41 18 February 2014, C-FFKQ 42 wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 February 2014 11:25:24 UTC-5, wrote: On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 7:17:16 AM UTC-6, Don Johnstone wrote: =20 It occurred to me that attaching the tow rope to the tug near the center = of gravity (top of turtle deck on a Pawnee for example) would make kiting a= non-event. That's how all the RC gliders are towed since you cannot contr= ol the position of the glider really well in relation to the towplane while= standing on the ground. Interference of the tow rope with rudder and elev= ator does not seem to be a problem for RC fliers. Um... wouldn't that cause a great risk of fouling the tail feathers of the = tug? No more "boxing the wash". OK here is a whacky idea. A V shaped boom with the point to the rear of the rudder, the release mounted at this point. The two front points mounted to a pivot, through the fuselage above the wing, near the CoG. The V arrangement can pivot up, but not down. The space between the arms has to be sufficient to allow full rudder. Would only work for low wing monoplanes. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 1:50:52 PM UTC-7, Don Johnstone wrote:
OK here is a whacky idea. A V shaped boom with the point to the rear of the rudder, the release mounted at this point. The two front points mounted to a pivot, through the fuselage above the wing, near the CoG. The V arrangement can pivot up, but not down. The space between the arms has to be sufficient to allow full rudder. Would only work for low wing monoplanes. Well as long as were are drawing on envelopes, how about a bridle attached to each wingtip of the towplane, with the towhook at the apex of the bridle, able to slide side to side (to prevent rudder stalls) while the bridle pivots up during kiting so the force just pulls the towplane higher! To drop the glider, release one end of the bridle and the towhook just slips off. Or just teach the stupid glider pilot to fly the correct tow position! Of course, a good winch solves this problem nicely.... Kirk |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 6:56:56 PM UTC-5, kirk.stant wrote:
On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 1:50:52 PM UTC-7, Don Johnstone wrote: OK here is a whacky idea. A V shaped boom with the point to the rear of the rudder, the release mounted at this point. The two front points mounted to a pivot, through the fuselage above the wing, near the CoG. The V arrangement can pivot up, but not down. The space between the arms has to be sufficient to allow full rudder. Would only work for low wing monoplanes. Well as long as were are drawing on envelopes, how about a bridle attached to each wingtip of the towplane, with the towhook at the apex of the bridle, able to slide side to side (to prevent rudder stalls) while the bridle pivots up during kiting so the force just pulls the towplane higher! To drop the glider, release one end of the bridle and the towhook just slips off. Or just teach the stupid glider pilot to fly the correct tow position! Of course, a good winch solves this problem nicely.... Kirk The Dragonfly towplane for hang & ultralite gliders uses a bridle attached above the top of the rudder and just below the bottom of the rudder, withbthe tow rope free to ride up and down on the bridle. Hang gliders sometimes get way out of shape, but the tug isn't affected. UH |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 08:41:57 -0800, C-FFKQ (42) wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 February 2014 11:25:24 UTC-5, wrote: On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 7:17:16 AM UTC-6, Don Johnstone wrote: It occurred to me that attaching the tow rope to the tug near the center of gravity (top of turtle deck on a Pawnee for example) would make kiting a non-event. That's how all the RC gliders are towed since you cannot control the position of the glider really well in relation to the towplane while standing on the ground. Interference of the tow rope with rudder and elevator does not seem to be a problem for RC fliers. Um... wouldn't that cause a great risk of fouling the tail feathers of the tug? No more "boxing the wash". From what I know of model aircraft I suspect, but can't prove it, that the fin on an RC model is (relatively) considerably stronger than the fin on a towplane. Structurally, most RC model fins are either solid balsa sheet or a foam-filled fibreglass moulding. If its a sheet balsa fin its almost guaranteed to be a lot harder and denser than I'd ever use on a model I was building myself. An RC model can be dumped on the strip in a manner that would wreck any GA aircraft. They are very frequently landed this way. Rounding out? Whats that? Land the model badly on grass enough to flip it over onto its back and the fin is almost guaranteed to be undamaged. Could you say the same about a typical towplane's fin? -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
inReach website not updating track automatically | Eric Greenwell[_4_] | Soaring | 4 | September 23rd 13 09:59 PM |
Compare/Contrast: CG hook on aerotow vs. CG hook on winch | son_of_flubber | Soaring | 37 | June 4th 12 10:40 PM |
TOST E85 RELEASES | [email protected] | Soaring | 2 | March 6th 05 04:21 PM |
Cumulus releases version 1.2.1 | André Somers | Soaring | 0 | March 2nd 05 09:58 PM |
NSA releases EC-121 Liberty tapes: no smoking gun | Mike Weeks | Military Aviation | 0 | July 9th 03 05:06 AM |