![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 09:24:14 -0400, Stephen Harding
wrote: Until then, its an internal matter for the US to decide. Tough luck for you. That's kind of a good 19th century attitude...I think it's not really valid anymore in our interconnected world where one country's policies affect many other countries. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dick Locke wrote:
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 09:24:14 -0400, Stephen Harding wrote: Until then, its an internal matter for the US to decide. Tough luck for you. That's kind of a good 19th century attitude...I think it's not really valid anymore in our interconnected world where one country's policies affect many other countries. Until the vote is given out to non-citizens of a country, it most certainly is an internal matter. Not to say there can't be external ramifications over those decisions, but its all part of the decision process within the country at issue. And it is most especially true when that issue is one of national security. Whether 19th century or 21st, it is a fact that different nations have different national interests. There is no one policy size that fits all. Representative government means just that; *my* Senator or Congressman should reflect *my* concerns, not the citizens of France. If he does, then he pays the political price for not doing what *I* want him to do. SMH |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 15:17:46 -0400, Stephen Harding
wrote: Representative government means just that; *my* Senator or Congressman should reflect *my* concerns, not the citizens of France. If he does, then he pays the political price for not doing what *I* want him to do. Well, I hope most of his constituents want him not act as if the US is in a world of its own. To be more specific, maybe every poster on rta isn't entitled to have his beliefs stated and considered by the US government but I believe governments should have a voice in how their citizens are treated at immigration in other countries. Freedom travel is essential to getting business done and I personally think it's right up there with other major human freedoms. In that sense your congressman should indeed consider the concerns of the gov't of France and a bunch of other countries. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
30 Jan 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 31st 04 03:55 AM |
15 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | December 15th 03 10:01 PM |
27 Nov 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 1 | November 30th 03 05:57 PM |
18 Sep 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 19th 03 03:47 AM |