A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Air America breaking news: "USA to fingerprint ALL visitors !!!"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 6th 04, 03:48 AM
Jim Yanik
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Paul J. Adam" wrote in
:

In message , Stephen Harding
writes
I have no intention of shooting anyone.


Agree fully with Stephen on this: back when I was a pistol shooter I
cheerfully massacred hordes of cardboard silhouettes with no intention
of finding live targets, and that applied to everyone I knew who shot:
we enjoyed socialising while turning live rounds into empty cases, and
trying to improve our grouping or our course times or both.

Massachusetts
law doesn't let you off the hook if you shoot someone
that has broken into your home. You are required to
leave the premises if escape is possible.


As a side note, in the UK "duty of retreat" doesn't apply in your home:
you're allowed to use whatever means are reasonable and necessary to
defend yourself if attacked there.



Yes,it's just the definition of "reasonable and necessary" that's
questionable,arbitrary,and vague.

IMO,once they're in my home,they're a threat to my life.
You cannot consider it otherwise,there's always that possibility.



--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net
  #2  
Old April 6th 04, 08:18 AM
Paul J. Adam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message , Jim Yanik
writes
"Paul J. Adam" wrote in
:
As a side note, in the UK "duty of retreat" doesn't apply in your home:
you're allowed to use whatever means are reasonable and necessary to
defend yourself if attacked there.


Yes,it's just the definition of "reasonable and necessary" that's
questionable,arbitrary,and vague.


....which is interpreted by a jury of your peers if necessary. It's
worked for the last seven hundred years or so (there's case law going
back to the 1300s). A basic rule of thumb is "hurt them until they run
away, then stop unless they turn back".

IMO,once they're in my home,they're a threat to my life.
You cannot consider it otherwise,there's always that possibility.


No problem: you just need to raise a reasonable doubt on those lines in
the minds of the jury. If Fred Barras had been shot in the chest then
Tony Martin would probably have been acquitted.

--
When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite.
W S Churchill

Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
30 Jan 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 January 31st 04 03:55 AM
15 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 December 15th 03 10:01 PM
27 Nov 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 1 November 30th 03 05:57 PM
18 Sep 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 19th 03 03:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.