![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Kevin Brooks
writes "Paul J. Adam" wrote in message ... "The USAF who will fly and fight the aircraft", or "the USAF press releases and contractual acceptance schedules"? Big difference. In your mind. And to the operators. British and several other nations, including the US. I don't think so. Based on what experience? Is this your informed opinion from experience in the field, or a knee-jerk reflex? I have. Release certification and clearance to carry and drop the live weapon. Good on you--you go keep those USAF types in line, Paul; God only knows how we have managed to muddle through thus far without your editorial input to the folks who fly these things and fight in them. So, when have they flown a warshot, or released even an inert training round? Nothing published, nothing announced that I can find: just some scale model wind-tunnel work. That's not "editorial input", that's reality. So far all that's been published is some wind-tunnel model work. Nowhere near actual operational utility. Tell it to the USAF. Go ahead--tell them they just HAVE to delete any reference to the F/A-22 being JDAM capable when it enters front-line service 'cause you say so... Why? It's an accepted convention that "capable" means "should be able to accept once there's time and money to get the clearances". That you're spinning that into a complete operational clearance is your error of understanding, not mine. Been there, done that, seen the pencil-whipping. Give me a single F/A-22 JDAM warshot drop. There must be _some_ news article _somewhere_ to report an event like that. Or is it "fully operational" except that the first actual live-fire test will be in combat? Yeah, *that* has worked really well in the past. Note that it has yet to enter into front-line combat unit service; those fielded thus far are either at Edwards or joining the conversion/opeval unit at Tyndall. In other words, again, "capable" doesn't actually mean "cleared to carry and use". I'm not paying for the 'A' designator and it's not my military trusting that 'capability' will mean 'can actually put warheads on target'. Who really cares at this point. The pilots and planners might have some views on the subject. USAF says it will be JDAM capable when it enters operational service--you say it won't be. It's "capable" now, it just hasn't been reported as cleared to carry and use the weapon. Don't you understand the difference? "Capable" means the weapon should fit and nobody can see any good reason why it can't be persuaded to work safely. "Cleared" means it's been tested and confirmed that the weapon and its interfaces fits, remains secure through the flight envelope, and can be safely released (and jettisoned) without getting hung up or recontacting the airframe. Most folks will accept the USAF version unless you can prove they are lying. You do realise that both versions can be correct? It certainly *should* be "capable" but that tells you very little about its actual ability to deliver warshots. Kind of hard for you to do at this point. Never once claimed they were lying, just that they haven't done (for example) store separation tests yet. Airframe 4003/91-4003 is intended to carry out the JDAM integration testing: point being "intended", meaning that testing lies in the future rather than the past. Or to quote John Manclark, director of test and evaluation at US Air Force Headquarters: "IOT&E exercises will assess a four-ship employment of Raptors in likely combat scenario. The 31-week evaluation will focus on four key capabilities: global deployment; effectiveness in counter-air missions; survivability in an air-to-air and surface-to-air environment; and sortie-generation. It will culminate in a sortie surge demonstration. IOT&E will identify areas for improvement before the aircraft achieves its initial operational capability milestone that is expected before the end of 2005. Before IOC, the service will conduct follow-on operational test and evaluation to validate JDAM release from the Raptor." Again, the F-22 is 'capable' - just not certified or cleared yet. That's not my opinion, that's a current statement from the USAF. -- When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite. W S Churchill Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Call me an old cynic
But it wouldn't surprise me in the least to see a news release (in the next week or so) about F/A-22 and JDAMs testing from the USAF.... Now would't that be completly froody!!. Cheers John Cook Any spelling mistakes/grammatic errors are there purely to annoy. All opinions are mine, not TAFE's however much they beg me for them. Email Address :- Spam trap - please remove (trousers) to email me Eurofighter Website :- http://www.eurofighter-typhoon.co.uk |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 08:31:44 +1000, John Cook
wrote: Call me an old cynic But it wouldn't surprise me in the least to see a news release (in the next week or so) about F/A-22 and JDAMs testing from the USAF.... Now would't that be completly froody!!. Ah Haa.... Froody ALERT!!! not bad it was 3 weeks... http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123007616 On the 30 april 2004 "Edwards officials will continue to develop the Raptor design, focusing more on developing air-to-ground attack capabilities, General Pearson said. "With the recent successful drop of the first bomb from the Raptor's weapons bay, Edwards will continue to expand this line of testing until we have successfully developed the required ground-attack features," General Pearson said. Operational testers have already started planning for the follow-on test and evaluation phase of the Raptor, which includes JDAM release testing, Colonel Freeman said." Which means they might have dropped a JDAM by now!, but I have not found any reference to it yet. Can anyone help?. Cheers John Cook Any spelling mistakes/grammatic errors are there purely to annoy. All opinions are mine, not TAFE's however much they beg me for them. Email Address :- Spam trap - please remove (trousers) to email me Eurofighter Website :- http://www.eurofighter-typhoon.co.uk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|