No More New Fighter Aircraft Types?

"Scott Ferrin" wrote in message
...

Yeah those facts are a damn inconvenience aren't they?

Facts are something you have always been in short supply of Ferrin,

Yet another claim that Tarver can't back up. In our little debates
YOU are the one constantly whining about not being able to post any
references.

What debate? Once there was me making claims about the F-22 while you and a
bunch of trolls and Lockmart partisans attacked me, but now it turns out I
have been correct all along. You are not really in any position to complain
Ferrin. Now stop your yelling and act like the discredited adult you are.

On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 21:19:25 -0700, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


"Scott Ferrin" wrote in message
.. .

Yeah those facts are a damn inconvenience aren't they?

Facts are something you have always been in short supply of Ferrin,

Yet another claim that Tarver can't back up. In our little debates
YOU are the one constantly whining about not being able to post any
references.

What debate? Once there was me making claims about the F-22 while you and a
bunch of trolls and Lockmart partisans attacked me, but now it turns out I
have been correct all along.

How do you figure? Even then loosest translation of all that's
transpired doesn't support your claim that the F-22 is a dog. Not
even close. But hey you just keep telling yourself that.


You are not really in any position to complain
Ferrin. Now stop your yelling and act like the discredited adult you are.


Same old Tarver. No evidence and no nads to back his claims.