Asw20 vs Discus

I think it's a really interesting question, made more complex by the
various versions of the ASW 20. The UK handicaps suggest the b,c and 16.6m
versions are better than the Discus (a,b, c or cs) and I think in terms of
pure performance that is probably right.

The main difference for me is that the Discus is a generation newer. It
has self connecting controls, achieves similar performance without the
complexity of flaps, is easier to get water into and probably easier to fly
for a less experienced pilot. Older ASW20's will probably come with
problems (e.g. water systems not working properly, poor gel) and might need
a bit of work to get to the same standard.

In Europe, a 20 'a' (same handicap as Discus) will probably cost
significantly less than a Discus, and the later versions (probably better
performance) about the same.

Overall, I find myself wondering which I would choose. I think with the
time to find the right 20, or flexibility to refurbish one, that is
probably the better option, but a close call and a decision which might not
be the same for everyone.


At 18:44 11 May 2014, wrote:
Hi,

I am looking for any advice as to which had a higher performance out of
these two gliders. I realise it will be pretty similar as they have the
same handicap, but anything you can tell me such as:
Strong vs weak conditions?
How well does each carry water?
Anything else you can offer.

I realise they are hard to compare as they are from different classes.

Thanks
RB

Reply re-posted without the typo's:

I think it's a really interesting question, made more complex by the
various versions of the ASW 20. The UK handicaps suggest the b,c and 16.6
versions are better than the Discus (a,b, c or cs) and I think in terms of
pure performance that is probably right.

The main difference for me is that the Discus is a generation newer. It has
self connecting controls, achieves similar performance without the
complexity of flaps, is easier to get water into and probably easier to fly
for a less experienced pilot. Older ASW20's will probably come with
problems (e.g. water systems not working properly, poor gel) and might need
a bit of work to get to the same standard.

In Europe, a 20 'a' (same handicap as Discus) will probably cost
significantly less than a Discus, and the later versions (probably better
performance) about the same.

Overall, I find myself wondering which I would choose. I think with the
time to find the right 20, or flexibility to refurbish one, that the 20 is
probably the better option, but a close call and a decision which might not
be the same for everyone.


At 18:44 11 May 2014, wrote:
Hi,

I am looking for any advice as to which had a higher performance out of
these two gliders. I realise it will be pretty similar as they have the
same handicap, but anything you can tell me such as:
Strong vs weak conditions?
How well does each carry water?
Anything else you can offer.

I realise they are hard to compare as they are from different classes.

Thanks
RB